ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Carl Shusterman's Immigration Update

description

  1. Visa Bulletin : Update and Predictions

    The government’s new fiscal year will begin on October 1st, and as usual, there will be some significant advances in priority dates for green cards, particularly in the employment-based categories.


    Employment-Based Categories


    The EB-1 category for persons born in India and China will again be current (no backlogs).
    The worldwide EB-2 category will again be current and will advance an average of 2 years for India and China.
    The worldwide EB-3 category will advance 1 month. China EB-3 will jump forward over 3 years, Philippines by 5 months and India by only 2 weeks.
    The worldwide EB-4 category will remain current, with a huge leap forward for various Central American countries.
    Worldwide EB-5 also will remain current, but China EB-5 will inch forward by only 1 week. The EB-5 regional center program is due to expire on September 30 and will need to be reauthorized by Congress.


    Family-Based Categories


    The forward movement in the family-based categories will remain slow. The worldwide categories will advance between 1 and 6 weeks.
    However, there are a few notable exceptions.
    Mexico 2A will advance by 3 months, China F4 by 4 months and India F4 by almost 2 years.


    Predictions for the Near Future


    The State Department predicts that India EB-2 will continue to advance up to 4 months each Visa Bulletin and that China EB-2 will move forward by 3 months.
    The demand for EB-3 numbers could slow down the forward worldwide movement in the coming fiscal year. India will continue to inch forward by only one week per month (Time to get rid of per-country quotas!). However, China will advance by 3 months at a time and EB-3 Philippines could also see significant advances.
    The family-based categories are all severely backlogged and any forward movement will be incremental.

    Updated 09-12-2016 at 12:35 PM by CShusterman

  2. Good News for Physicians Who Want Green Cards

    On March 9, 2016, the USCIS designated Matter of H-V-P, I.D. 16270 (AAO) as a precedent decision. It provides that the physicians who are specialists who practice in a medically-underserved area for a minimum of 5 years are entitled to permanent residence in the US through a National Interest Waiver (NIW).

    Is this really news? No, but the Director of USCIS’s Texas Service Center had denied that the physician’s NIW, holding that only primary care physicians are entitled to such waivers, this despite the fact that the USCIS has approved thousands of such NIWs for specialists over the past decade.

    This requires a little recounting of history.

    The Law (1999)
    On November 12, 1999, section 5 of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999 (“Nursing Relief Act”), was enacted to encourage foreign-born physicians to practice in medically underserved areas of the US.

    The law allows “all alien physicians” who practice for at least 5 years in a medically-underserved area to qualify a green card.

    The Regulation (2000)
    On September 6, 2000, to implement the statute, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) published a regulation which restricted the applicability of the law to primary care physicians. The regulation also contained a number of other restrictive provisions not found in the law.

    The Lawsuit (2002-2006)
    On December 9, 2002, one Grumpy Immigration Attorney (Yours Truly) filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court challenging the various restrictive clauses contained in the regulation which contradicted the generous terms of the law.

    On my birthday in 2004, the Federal Judge dismissed our lawsuit. Happy Birthday, Carl!

    We appealed this decision to the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, and on June 7, 2006, in Schneider v. Chertoff, the Appeals Court unanimously ruled in our favor.

    However, the Court declined to rule on one of most important restrictions, that prohibiting specialist from qualifying for NIWs. Among the many physicians across the US who volunteered to be plaintiffs in our lawsuit, only one was a specialist. We made sure that his attorney filed an I-140 NIW on his behalf. The USCIS sent him a Request for Evidence (RFE) asking why he, as a specialist, was applying for an NIW since the regulations specifically prohibited this. Rather than respond to the RFE, the attorney simply failed to take action, and the I-140 was denied because of his failure to submit a timely response.

    Hence, the Appeals Court declined to decide this important issue.

    The Memo (2007)
    Although I was thrilled to win the lawsuit, I was disappointed that the Court had not ruled on this important issue.

    A couple of weeks later, I spoke at the Annual Conference of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) in Nashville, Tennessee.

    It was there that I had a conversation with a top official of the USCIS. He was concerned that I was requesting attorney’s fees from the government for my 4 years of work in Schneider v. Chertoff under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). In turn, I expressed my concern about having to sue the government once again to resolve the issue of whether a specialist physician could qualify for an NIW.

    We agreed that if I would drop my request for EAJA fees, he would include a clause in the upcoming USCIS memo stating that physicians who were specialists could qualify for green cards through NIWs.

    On January 23, 2007, the USCIS issued a policy memo which declared that “though not mandated by the Schneider decision, USCIS is expanding the fields of medical specialty that may qualify physicians for NIWs by accepting petitions on behalf of physicians who provide specialty care.”

    NIWs for Physician Specialists
    Since 2007, our law firm has obtained green cards for thousands of physicians, many of them specialists, through the NIW process as well as through PERM, but apparently not all attorneys have been so fortunate. See below.

    Matter of H-V-P (2016)
    In Matter of H-V-P, the Director of the Texas Service Center denied the NIW petition on behalf of a Hematologist/Oncologist on the ground that he practiced in a HPSA/MUA, not in a Physician Shortage Area (PSA), and that only specialists who practiced in PSAs should be able to apply for NIWs.

    The USCIS’s Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) rejected this argument citing the 2007 memo.

    One month later, the USCIS designated Matter of H-V-P as a precedent decision, meaning that USCIS officers cannot deny NIWs to physicians simply because they are specialists.

    Although this battle took almost 2 decades to resolve, I am very pleased to have fought the good fight, and forced the agency to follow the law.





    Updated 05-09-2016 at 03:06 PM by CShusterman

  3. Was Elvis' Manager an Illegal Alien?

    Who is more of an American idol than Elvis Presley?


    The Beatles? No, those lads were from Liverpool.


    What made a teenager from Tupelo, Mississippi, into an icon of music, television and film?


    Yes, Elvis was extremely talented. His rock and rock style was fabulous, but he did not write his own songs, wasn't much of a guitarist and his acting left a lot to be desired.


    One thing that Elvis had that many of his contemporaries lacked was his manager, Colonel Tom Parker. Colonel Tom, as he was called, was the reason both he and Elvis made millions of dollars (a 50-50 split, yes really!) and the reason that Elvis never toured abroad.


    Elvis said of Colonel Tom, "I don't think I'd have ever been very big if it wasn't for him. He's a very smart man."


    Colonel Tom was frequently seen wearing his trademark cowboy hat and puffing on his cigar. According to legend, he was born in Huntington, West Virginia and ran away from home to join the circus. He served in the US Army in the 1920s and married Marie Mott, a US citizen, in 1935.


    But though the true facts did not come out until years after Elvis's death, in 1977, "Colonel Tom" was an invented persona. In responding to a lawsuit in 1982, Colonel Tom revealed that he was a Dutch citizen. His real name was Andreas Cornelis van Kujik and he was born in the Netherlands.


    And why did Mr. van Kujik turn down multi-million dollar offers received for Elvis to perform abroad?


    You guessed it! Colonel Tom was living illegally in the US from the 1920s until his death in 1997. And control freak that he was, he knew that if he ever accompanied Elvis abroad, there was no way for the Colonel to reenter the US.


    Colonel Tom may have been able to legalize his immigration status through his US citizen wife or through other means, but he choose not to do so. We may never know why, although his Wikipedia bio provides some possible reasons.


    Perhaps, his life can best be summed up by Priscilla Presley's eulogy at his funeral:



    "Elvis and the Colonel made history together, and the world is richer, better and far more interesting because of their collaboration. And now I need to locate my wallet, because I noticed there was no ticket booth on the way in here, but I'm sure that the Colonel must have arranged for some toll on the way out."
  4. The Immigration Law Turns 50

    The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (aka the “Hart-Celler Act”) turned 50 years old on October 3, 2015.


    The Act was passed shortly after the Civil Rights Acts in 1964 and 1965, and ended the National Origins quota system which had restricted most U.S. immigration to natives of Germany, Great Britain and Ireland. For example, in 1929, out of 150,000 immigrate slots, over 50,000 were reserved for Germans, 100 to Greeks and zero to Chinese.


    With the 1965 Act, we committed ourselves, for the first time, to accepting immigrants of all nationalities. However, when the Act was passed, there was little certainty that more than a few thousand persons from non-European countries would be able to immigrate to the U.S.


    The Act, as introduced, would have based most immigration on the skills of each immigrant. However, in order to secure the support for the bill, the Johnson Administration agreed to let Representative Michael Feighan (D-Ohio), the Chairman of the House Immigration Subcommittee, amend the bill to grant most green cards to relatives of U.S. citizens and a far lesser amount to persons based on their skills. Representative Feighan’s intent was to make sure that U.S. immigration would remain European-based. Since over 90% of the U.S. citizens were of white, European background, he reasoned that a mostly family-based system would keep America white. What Rep. Feighan and his allies failed to consider was that most Europeans no longer wished to immigrate to the U.S.


    Senators and members of the House of Representatives voted for the bill in overwhelming numbers. The primary opposition came from segregationist Southerners who did not want to change the National Origins quota system. Senator Sam Ervin (D-NC) was able to amend the bill in order to impose a first-time 120,000 person quota on immigration from the Western Hemisphere, a move that made it impossible for many people to legally immigrate to the U.S.


    Upon signing the bill into law, President Johnson’s statement included the following:


    “This bill says simply that from this day forth those wishing to immigrate to America shall be admitted on the basis of their skills and their close relationship to those already here. This is a simple test, and it is a fair test. Those who can contribute most to this country – to its growth, to its strength, to its spirit – will be the first that are admitted to this land.”


    These days, we welcome immigrants from all countries. An increasing number are admitted due to their education and skills. True, there is more work to be done, but the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was revolutionary.
  5. US Immigration For Registered Nurses: Free Legal Assistance

    Are you are foreign-born Registered Nurse looking for a job in the US? Our law firm can introduce you to a hospital in the US which is sponsoring RNs for temporary visas and green cards. The hospital will pay 100% of your legal fees.

    Our law firm
    represents over 100 hospitals, and during the past 30+ years, we have immigrated over 10,000 RNs and other health care professionals to the US.

    Our client hospitals currently have several hundred job opportunities for Registered Nurses, Medical Technologists and other health care professionals.

    If you are interested in finding a job in the US and being sponsored for a temporary visa or a green card, feel free to send your resume to Paralegal Elsa Garcia at egarcia@shusterman.com

    She will forward your information to one or more of our hospitals and a representative from a hospital will contact you.

    Our services are free to you. Both attorney and filing fees will be paid for by the hospitals that we represent.

    This video explains the procedures for getting TN and H-1B visas for RNs. It also shows how hospitals can sponsor registered nurses for green cards.

    We also discuss the Visa Screen Certificate, posting requirements as well as the CGFNS and the NCLEX examinations.

    If you would like to know more about any of the following subjects, please see the following pages on our website.

    Resources for Registered Nurses


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: