ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy

description

  1. New NFAP Report Challenges Wisdom of Proposed H-1B Restrictions

    by , 05-01-2013 at 08:27 PM (Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy)
    Senators Durbin and Grassley have succeeded in slipping in a number of foolish protectionist provisions in S.744 that will impose all sorts of new taxes and disruptive restrictions that will make the H-1B program a lot less efficient. The provisions will also probably result in the US being sued under the GATS, the world trade in services treaty. The National Foundation on American Policy has a new report warning of the consequences of some of these proposed changes.
  2. Supreme Court Strikes Another Nail in the Coffin of Alabama Immigration Law

    by , 04-29-2013 at 10:19 AM (Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy)
    From the National Immigration Law Center:

    Supreme
    Court Rejects Alabama's Request to Review the State's Anti-immigrant Law



    Eleventh Circuit Appeals
    Court Ruling Blocking Law's Criminalizing Acts of Kindness Remains in Place
    WASHINGTON --
    The U.S. Supreme Court today rejected the state of Alabama's request to review
    a provision of the state's anti-immigrant law that was blocked by the U.S.
    Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit last year.



    In February, Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange petitioned the Supreme
    Court to consider the provision of the law that criminalizes neighborly acts of
    kindness, or Section 13, the "harboring and transporting" provision. This
    provision criminalized individuals who engaged in routine daily activities with
    undocumented immigrants.



    The circuit court has blocked most of Alabama's anti-immigrant law as
    unconstitutional, including provisions that would have chilled Latino student
    access to Alabama elementary schools.



    Last summer, the Supreme Court struck down most of Arizona's SB 1070, which
    served as a model for the Alabama law. The Court ruled that much of the Arizona
    law was unconstitutional because it interfered with federal authority over
    immigration.



    "The Supreme Court has rightly struck another nail in the coffin of laws that
    attempt to sanction racial profiling," said Karen Tumlin, managing attorney for
    the National Immigration Law Center. "Alabama's legislators, both at the state
    and at the federal levels should take note: they, like the rest of the country,
    should move forward, not backward, to bring our immigration laws in line with
    our societal and economic needs."



     "The Supreme Court's decision to not hear the case was expected," said
    Sam Brooke, staff attorney of the Southern Poverty Law Center. "The high court
    invalidated most of Arizona's immigration law last year, stating unequivocally
    that immigration is a federal issue and states may not create their own
    enforcement schemes. That is why the lower courts already blocked Alabama's
    law." Mr. Brooke further noted, "We need meaningful and comprehensive
    immigration reform from Washington, D.C. Hopefully the lessons learned from
    H.B. 56 will motivate Congress to act quickly to address this pressing issue."
    "The Supreme
    Court made the right decision not to hear this case," said Cecillia Wang,
    director of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "All the lower federal courts
    - and the court of public opinion - have said no to divisive state laws like
    this one, and Americans have moved on  to support immigration reform that
    creates a new common sense immigration system."



    The Eleventh Circuit has also blocked the following provisions of the law:

    Section
    10, which criminalized failing to register one's immigration status
    (blocked by the Eleventh Circuit);
    Section
    11(a), which criminalized the solicitation of work (blocked by the
    Eleventh Circuit);
    Sections
    11(f) and (g), which criminalized day laborers' first amendment right to
    solicit work (blocked by the District Court in Birmingham and not
    appealed); and
    Section
    27, which infringed on the ability of individuals to contract with someone
    who was undocumented (blocked by the Eleventh Circuit);
    Section
    28, which requires the immigration verification of newly enrolled K-12
    students (blocked by the Eleventh Circuit).


    Today's order from the Supreme Court came in the
    parallel case of United
    States v. Alabama, but the provisions were also challenged by
    private plaintiffs in HICA
    v. Bentley.  The civil rights organizations involved in HICA v. Bentley, the
    class-action challenge to Alabama's anti-immigrant law, include the Southern
    Poverty Law Center, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Alabama,
    the National Immigration Law Center, the Asian Law Caucus, the Asian American
    Justice Center, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the
    National Day Laborers' Organizing Network, and LatinoJustice-PRLDEF.
  3. House Judiciary Committee to Consider Piecemeal Immigration Bills

    by , 04-25-2013 at 06:59 PM (Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy)
    House Judiciary Committee Chair Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) and Immigration Subcommittee Chair Trey Gowdy (R-SC) held a joint press briefing today to announce they would not wait on the House Gang of Eight and would consider individual immigration bills on different aspects of reform. Goodlatte's move is expected to put pressure on the House negotiators to accelerate their work an introduce their bill in the next few weeks.
    Whether the Judiciary Committee will vote to provide a path to citizenship is far from clear. But Senator McCain made it clear to the House that they shouldn't bother passing immigration reform without a path to citizenship as that would not be acceptable to the Senate.
    The Senate, in the mean time, is ready to move in to mark up mode. Senator Leahy has said they'll start on May 9th and amendments are due in on the 7th.
  4. Paul Ryan Taking on Rubio's Pro-Immigration Role in the House

    by , 04-25-2013 at 04:20 AM (Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy)
    As strong as Marco Rubio has been on pushing immigration reform in the Senate, former VP presidential candidate Paul Ryan looks to exceed those efforts in the House, according to this by Benjy Sarlin in Talking Points Memo.
  5. Cato Institute Immigration Program

    by , 04-24-2013 at 07:15 PM (Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy)
    The Cato folks have posted the video of the program at the Capitol today in which I participated. I talked about sections of the bill I liked that the media hasn't discussed. Alex and Tim, the other panelists talked about the guest worker provisions as well as why immigration reform is important to protecting our homeland security. I was getting over a pretty bad cold so if my voice sounds off a bit, you'll know why.
     
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: