ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

I-9 E-Verify Immigration Compliance

description

  1. DACA Recipients not protected from Citizenship Discrimination

    By Bruce E. Buchanan, Siskind Susser PC

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OSC.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	5.7 KB 
ID:	981

    The Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, through an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), issued a decision in Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Arizona Family Health Partnership, 11 OCAHO no.1254 (July 2015), finding that the employer did not discriminate against the Complainant, Brian Gonzalez-Hernandez, because a DACA recipient is not a protected individual for citizenship status discrimination. Further, there was no document abuse.

    Gonzalez-Hernandez, a DACA recipient with an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), applied for a position as a healthcare navigator. The job required extensive travel throughout Arizona. Thus, the job description required a valid Arizona Driverís license. Arizona Family Health Partnership (AFHP) offered Gonzalez-Hernandez the job and requested him to provide proof of an Arizona driverís license. Gonzalez-Hernandez stated he only had a California driving permit.

    Thereafter, AFHP rescinded their offer of employment due to the lack of an Arizona driverís license, but stated that once Gonzalez-Hernandez obtained such a driverís license, he would be eligible for the position. AFHP cited the state law which requires anyone who works in Arizona for at least seven months in a year must obtain an Arizona driverís license. At this point, Gonzalez-Hernandez notified AFHP that he was a DACA recipient, and under Arizona state law, was unable to obtain an Arizona driverís license.

    After AFHP hired someone else, Gonzalez-Hernandez filed a charge with the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) alleging discrimination and document abuse. Thereafter, the OSC provided a letter to Gonzalez-Hernandez giving him the right to pursue an action before OCAHO. Gonzalez-Hernandez filed such an action.

    The ALJ found Gonzalez-Hernandez was not protected by the statute Ė a protected individual is a citizen or national of the United States, a permanent resident, refugee, asylee, or temporary resident agricultural worker. A DACA recipient does not fit into any of these categories; thus, this allegation was dismissed. The ALJ also dismissed the document abuse allegation for several reasons Ė Gonzalez-Hernandez was never asked to complete an I-9 form. AFHPís request for a driverís license was not to determine work authorization, and the request was for a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason Ė the job required an Arizona driverís license.
    Takeaways

    Citizenship discrimination is limited to only those protected individuals and a DACA recipient is not protected. Furthermore, in order to establish document abuse, an employer must request an employee to complete an I-9 form.

    Updated 08-19-2015 at 11:54 AM by BBuchanan

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: