ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

I-9 E-Verify Immigration Compliance

description

  1. Speedy Gonzalez Subject to Fines for Immigration Violations

    By Bruce Buchanan, Siskind Susser

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	doj.jpg 
Views:	65 
Size:	6.4 KB 
ID:	860 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ice_immigration_customs_enforcement.jpg 
Views:	63 
Size:	4.2 KB 
ID:	861 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Speedy_Gonzalez_Construction_Inc.jpg 
Views:	62 
Size:	5.0 KB 
ID:	862

    In U.S. v. Speedy Gonzalez Construction, Inc., the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) faced several interesting issues in determining the potential liability of the company. Speedy Gonzalez is a husband-and-wife-owned construction company, located in Glendale, Arizona. After Speedy Gonzalez provided its I-9 forms to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), it was served with two Notices of Suspect Documents identifying 83 individuals who appeared to be unauthorized for employment.

    ICE’s complaint alleged the company failed to prepare and/or present I-9 forms for 101 employees and failed to ensure the proper completion of Section 1 and/or failed to complete Section 2 or 3 of the I-9 forms. There was not a material factual dispute on most of the issues in the Complaint.

    For the nine employees who the company failed to ensure proper completion of Section 1 of the I-9 form, the errors involved:

    - failure of the employee to sign the I-9 form
    ;
    - failure of the employee to check a status box; and
    - failure to record a permanent resident’s alien number.

    Speedy Gonzalez raised a number of defenses to assert there were material disputes of fact. One defense was that some former employees worked fewer than three days or never worked for the company. Another defense used by the company was that its use of the E-Verify system for some of those individuals constituted “good faith compliance” and “is equivalent to the examination certification in Section 2.”

    In determining whether the failure to complete the I-9 form is excusable based on an employee’s failure to continue employment for more than three days, “the expectations of the parties with respect to the duration of employment, as well as the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the hire, must be evaluated on a case by case basis.”

    The facts demonstrated some of these employees may have worked less than three days but their days of employment were spread over four to six days. Thus, OCAHO found these employees were on the payroll for at least three days after hire – meaning the company had an obligation to obtain completed I-9 forms.

    However, Speedy Gonzalez prevailed on its claim that four employees were never on its payroll because the Arizona Unemployment Tax and Wage Reports did not reflect any wages paid to these four individuals.

    OCAHO rejected the construction company’s defense that its use of E-Verify was equivalent to Section 2 certification. The E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding specifically states the “employer understands that participation in E-Verify does not exempt the employer from the responsibility to complete, retain and make available for inspection Forms I-9 that relate to its employees.” Thus, the company’s use of E-Verify does not excuse its failure to properly complete Section 2 of the I-9 forms and present the forms for inspection.

    Speedy Gonzalez was successful in arguing that the husband-and-wife owners did not have to complete I-9 forms. OCAHO has held owners with substantial control over the company do not have to complete an I-9 form. Unfortunately, ICE tends to ignore this case law and continues to allege violations for the failure of owners to prepare I-9 forms.

    Lastly, Speedy Gonzalez attempted another defense – arguing that it “recreated” some of the I-9 forms after the NOI when the original I-9 forms were missing. However, it was unsuccessful because OCAHO held the company failed to present “a scintilla of evidence that the original forms ever actually existed.”

    OCAHO did not assess any penalties at this time; rather, it ordered ICE to file its penalty request and Speedy Gonzalez to respond to the proposed penalty.

    A copy of the OCAHO decision is available here.
    Cite as U.S. v. Speedy Gonzalez Construction, Inc., 11 OCAHO no. 1228 (2014)

    Name:  siskind_susser_logo.jpg
Views: 786
Size:  2.9 KB ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Bruce Buchanan is an attorney with the law firm of Siskind Susser P.C. - www.visalaw.com - a full service U.S. immigration law firm representing employers and individuals nationwide for over 20 years. You can also follow this author on social media via Facebook and on Twitter @BuchananVisaLaw .

    Updated 11-12-2014 at 10:09 AM by BBuchanan

  2. Restaurant Owner Faces Jail Time for Undocumented Workers

    By Bruce Buchanan, Siskind Susser

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ice_immigration_customs_enforcement.jpg 
Views:	71 
Size:	4.2 KB 
ID:	856 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	wei_super_buffet_ice.jpg 
Views:	69 
Size:	4.7 KB 
ID:	859

    On October 20, 2014, the owner of two Chinese restaurants in Kansas and Missouri pleaded guilty to conspiring to employ and harbor undocumented workers. At sentencing, he faces up to 10 years in federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000. As part of a plea agreement, he admitted to employing at least 12 undocumented workers, paying them in cash and providing them housing.

    The investigation was led by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and resulted in the arrest of more than a dozen suspects including operators, managers, and employees connected with Wei’s Super Buffet in Olathe, KS and Wei’s Super Buffet No. 2 in Kansas City, MO.

    ICE found six undocumented immigrants at an apartment leased by one of the restaurant owner’s family members. Five other defendants were found guilty at trial of harboring undocumented workers, and participating in a wider conspiracy to obtain motor vehicle registrations, license plates, and titles for undocumented immigrants.

    Hiring of unauthorized workers is a violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA § 274A), which involves the failure of an employer to verify the employment eligibility of any person hired after November 6, 1986, by using the Form I-9.

    A copy of the press release from ICE can be found here.
    United States v. Wei Liu, et al., No. 13-20114-KHV (D. Kan.)
  3. OSC Settles Immigration Claim Against Construction Company

    By Bruce Buchanan, Siskind Susser

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	doj.jpg 
Views:	58 
Size:	6.4 KB 
ID:	852 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OSC.jpg 
Views:	59 
Size:	5.7 KB 
ID:	853



    The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC), within the Justice Department, has reached a settlement with Constructor Services Inc. (CSI), located in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. The settlement resolves a claim that the company engaged in discriminatory documentary practices during the employment eligibility verification process in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

    An investigation found that CSI required non-U.S. citizens, but not similarly-situated U.S. citizens, to produce specific documentary proof of their immigration status for the purpose of verifying their employment eligibility. The INA’s anti-discrimination provision prohibits employers from making additional and unauthorized documentary demands based on citizenship status or national origin when verifying or re-verifying an employee’s employment eligibility.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	hammer.jpg 
Views:	59 
Size:	2.7 KB 
ID:	854
    As part of the OSC settlement agreement, CSI will pay $18,000 in civil penalties to the United States and revise its employment eligibility re-verification policies. Further the company will be subject to monitoring of its employment eligibility verification practices for the next two (2) years and will be required to do the following:

    1) Advise OSC of any changes in the company’s employment policies as they relate to nondiscrimination on the basis of citizenship status and national origin at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such revised policies;

    2) Ensure that all individuals who are responsible for formulating, carrying out, and/or conducting training on the company’s employment eligibility verification and re-verification policies, including all supervisors, managers, administrators, or other employees who have any role making or communicating employment eligibility verification matters, such as completing the Form I-9 and/or using the E-Verify system ("Human Resources Personnel"), are in possession of the most current version of the Form I-9, USCIS Employment Eligibility Verification Handbook for Employers and the most current USCIS E-Verify Manual; and

    3) Send all new Human Resources Personnel to attend compliance training approved by the Office of Special Counsel – which will be video recorded and shown to all new Human Resources Personnel within sixty (60) days of hire.

    This is one of many OSC settlements in 2014 alleging a company had different standards for non-U.S. citizens and U.S. citizens.

    A copy of the CSI settlement agreement can be viewed here.
  4. OSC Settles Green Card Discrimination Case

    By Bruce Buchanan, Siskind Susser

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	doj.jpg 
Views:	54 
Size:	6.4 KB 
ID:	851 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OSC.jpg 
Views:	55 
Size:	5.7 KB 
ID:	849 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	osc_sonus_hearing_care_professionals.jpg 
Views:	68 
Size:	4.0 KB 
ID:	850

    The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC), within the Justice Department, has reached an agreement with Serendipity Hearing Inc., doing business as Sonus Hearing Care, a hearing services provider headquartered in Huntington Beach, California, resolving a claim that it engaged in discriminatory documentary practices during the employment eligibility verification process.

    The investigation found that Sonus required an employee, who was a lawful Permanent Resident, to show a new employment eligibility document when her Permanent Resident Card expired. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, an employer is prohibited from this practice because lawful permanent residents are still authorized to work in the United States, even after their Permanent Resident Cards expire. When the employee could not provide a new Permanent Resident Card, Sonus terminated her.

    As part of the OSC settlement agreement, Sonus will:

    - Pay $16,727 in back pay to the employee;
    - Pay $400 in civil penalties to the United States;
    - Revise its employment eligibility re-verification policies;
    - Be subject to monitoring of its employment eligibility verification practices; and
    - Undergo training on the anti-discrimination provision of the INA.

    The civil penalty assessed against Sonus was unusually low, presumably because this was a one-time occurrence. However, Sonus’s back pay was not low due to the alleged discriminating practice.

    The Takeaway

    Although it may seem logical to re-verify an employee’s expired document, it is unlawful for an employer to re-verify an expired Permanent Resident Card (also known as a “green card”). The reason for this is that Permanent Resident employees do not lose their Permanent Resident status or their work authorization when their green cards expire. Though they should renew their green cards, they remain Permanent Residents even after their cards expire. For a person to lose their Permanent Resident status, generally, it must be revoked by an Immigration Judge in Immigration Court.

    For employees who are not Permanent Residents, an employer must lawfully re-verify an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) after it expires since an employee’s authorization to work does end when their EAD expires.
  5. USCIS Launches myE-Verify for Employees

    By Bruce Buchanan, Siskind Susser

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dhs.jpg 
Views:	1309 
Size:	8.2 KB 
ID:	847 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	mye-verify_uscis.jpg 
Views:	830 
Size:	3.7 KB 
ID:	848

    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced the launch of a new web site designed for employees, called myE-Verify. The site is described as a “one-stop shop” for employees to open and manage a personal account giving them access to employment-related identity protection services.

    myE-Verify is being rolled-out to individuals in five states: Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Mississippi, and Virginia - and the District of Columbia. Besides residing in one of these locations, the user must also complete a Self Check with a result of "Work Authorization Confirmed."


    If the user is unable to complete Self Check, they cannot set up a myE-Verify account at this time.

    myE-Verify
    is meant to be a free and secure way for workers to participate in the E-Verify process by accessing features dedicated for employees. It is currently equipped with these three services:

    1. myE-Verify accounts - a free personal account to manage use of one’s information in E-Verify and Self Check;

    2. Self Lock - allows individuals to place a “lock” on their social security number (SSN) to help prevent unauthorized or fraudulent use of their SSN by another person to illegally obtain employment authorization within E-Verify. If their SSN is used, it will result in a Self Lock mismatch. Self Lock will remain active for 1 year and individuals can unlock their SSN any time a new employer needs to verify their employment eligibility in E-Verify; and

    3. myResources - a multimedia library for employees with these components: Employee Rights Toolkit , Your Rights with myE-Verify, Your Employer’s Responsibilities , and Privacy is Our Commitment .

    According to USCIS, the following features are planned for release at a later date:
    -Document Expiration Reminders, to set up alerts when a document (like a passport or driver’s license) is about to expire.
    -Case Tracker, to allow a user to track the status of their E-Verify or Self Check and know if any action is required.
    -Case History, to allow a user to monitor where and when their information has been used in the E-Verify system.

    Updated 10-16-2014 at 12:36 PM by BBuchanan

Page 37 of 62 FirstFirst ... 27353637383947 ... LastLast
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: