Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Seminars

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Classifieds

Advertise

VIP Lawyer Network

EB-5

High Net Worth

Custom Content

Dubai Events

Find HNW People

Custom Events

Custom Services

Professional Services

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Careers

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE




ilw.com VIP


The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-2014
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

ILW.COM EB-5 Blog

description

  1. H.R. 4659 Supports EB-5 By Gregory Finkelson

    On May 13, 2014, US Congressman Aaron Shock (R-IL) introduced a bill in the House of Representatives that, if passed, will further enhance the EB-5 program for both investors and Regional Centers, while potentially generating a stronger economy. The official name of the bill is H.R. 4659: The EB-5 Regional Center Extension Act of 2014.
    The main features of the bill include:

    • Replacing the limit on visa applications with a minimum number to be issued per year.
    • Expanding the definition of indirect employment to satisfy the EB-5 job creation requirements.
    • Giving Regional Center applicants priority consideration.


    All of this, of course, bodes well. Govtrack.us estimates that the bill has a 9% chance of getting past committee and a 2% chance of being enacted. While those percentages seem low at first glance, only 11% of all bills introduced make it past committee and only 3% are ever enacted, so it is fair to say that there is a fair bit of optimism concerning passage.
    To learn more, contact us online at American Corporate Services or call us at 415-682-2550.

    Updated 07-25-2014 at 02:23 PM by EB-5Blog

  2. EB-5 Supply and Demand By Gregory Finkelson

    The elephant in the EB-5 room has always been the inordinate length of time it has been taking for the USCIS to process I-924 applications. In many, if not most, cases the processing time has been well in excess of 12 months. This is the result of underestimating the demand, especially from China, and being understaffed and underequipped as a result.
    Three things have happened recently that have reduced processing time to 4.4 months, according to the National Law Review.

    • I-924 processing has been moved to the Immigrant Investor Program Office.
    • Regional Centers are proliferating throughout the US, not only promoting more projects, but also providing more assistance for investors.
    • The USCIS is now approving I-924s on the basis of “hypothetical projects.”

    To learn more, contact us online at American Corporate Services or call us at 415-682-2550.
  3. EB-5 Direct Investment or Indirect Regional Center Investment By Gregory Finkelson

    EB-5 Direct Investment or Indirect Regional Center Investment - Which Is Better?

    EB-5 Direct Investment is like a tree that gets lost in the forest of foreign investment options. This could be due to several factors, not the least of which is the increasing number of EB-5 related businesses seeking multiple investors to fund large projects that require raising large amounts of capital far in excess of the individual minimum $500,000.

    A direct investment requires creation of at least ten new W-2 jobs within the company in which the immigrant investor contributes equity. The direct approach is often more appealing to those who desire to earn a higher return on investment. Structurally speaking, the potential for a greater ROI is higher, but as in any risk versus reward equation, not only does the greater risk increase the potential for reward, but the potential for greater reward also increases the risks.

    Efficiency and versatility are often cited as advantages of direct investing. There is no regional restriction on the development of an investment project, so projects can be developed anywhere in the US. The USCIS approval process takes less time with a direct investment, which works to the benefit of both the project and the immigrant investors.

    Which is better – direct or indirect investment? The question itself seems to beg that the answer is one or the other, black or white. In reality, the answer is that the better investment is the one that is most suited for the individual applicant.

    Why Use a Regional Center?

    The point of a Regional Center is to be chartered by the USCIS to pool capital for job-creating investment projects and to facilitate both the investment and the immigration processes. While the process is slower, it is arguably more secure and has several immediately distinct advantages, not the least of which is that an RC can obtain pre-approval of proposed projects. While this adds time on the project side, once the project is approved, the investor side of the project should be shortened considerably.

    In terms of job creation, Regional Centers projects have a versatility of their own, as jobs created need not be direct or even indirect, as even induced job creation through the downstream impact may be taken into account. The provision allows for much broader prospects for fulfilling the EB-5 job creation requirements.

    From a financial perspective, participation through Regional Centers can be structured in a manner where the individual investments can be pooled into a limited partnership that then loans funds to the project. This creative route has a built-in exit strategy, otherwise known as the term of the loan.

    At first glance, EB-5 appears to be a one-size-fits-all, but that is simply not true. No one expects immigrant investors to come to the US in a straightjacket. A vital part of the EB-5 visa program is that it can be tailored to fit individual investors so that they arrive in style.
  4. Canadian Investment Visa Program Cancelled By Gregory Finkelson

    Canadian Investment Visa Program Cancelled
    Where Will the Chinese Investors Go?


    Canada’s decision to cancel its Investment Visa Program could be a mixed blessing for the U.S. EB-5 program, at least in the short term. The rather obvious positive side is that the Chinese investors who were already in the middle of the Canadian process might generally be inclined to continue their quest to relocate somewhere. One of their most likely choices is the United States. Their original choice of Canada might be an indication of their desire to immigrate to the Western Hemisphere. Their original capital will become unencumbered, so they will have cash readily available that had been heretofore “invested” in the Canadian program.

    On the other hand, there are other considerations. One of the primary reasons given for the cancellation of the Canadian program was to “eliminate a large and longstanding backlog of applications.” Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that, whether the Canadian government processes those applications forward (which they are not going to do) or processes them backward (returning deposits to program applicants and close their files), it is going to take quite some time to complete either task. If they can’t get the applications out of the mire, it doesn’t matter direct they try to flow them, they are still stuck in the bureaucratic red tape. It will take time to process. For that reason, I do not see an impending tsunami of EB-5 investors hitting the U.S. west coast.

    Nonetheless, should Canada take an inordinately lengthy amount of time to implement a new program, the number of Chinese seeking to participate in the EB-5 program could increase substantially. To my previous point about the Western Hemisphere, it may equally be assumed that some may have chosen Canada, not for its location, but because it belongs to the British Commonwealth. If that was an investor preference, it is unlikely that they will seek residency in the U.S.

    It is also important to note that the EB-5 program puts their investments at risk. The Canadian program did not. That program required immigrants to invest in the Canadian economy at large by requiring a loan from applicants to the Canadian government. Exactly as it implies, the government would repay that loan to the immigrants after a period of time. The EB-5 Program requires a minimum $500,000 investment with no guaranteed return.

    None of us can know how significant that was for those Chinese investors choosing Canada over the U.S. in the beginning. It could have been significant to all of them. We need to remember that the number of applicants for the EB-5 program may not be as much of an issue in our case as the U.S. limitation on the number of visas we are willing to issue. There are, without a doubt, far more interest investors than there are visas available. Which leads us to remember our own bureaucratic backlog with processing EB-5 applications. That backlog alone has the power to make the question of whether or not more Chinese investors will be attracted to the U.S. through the EB-5 program a moot point.



    One of the biggest problems with government is that policy makers all too often do not count the costs of the programs that they birth. When a woman becomes pregnant, she and her husband do not plan just for the ensuing nine months. They plan for the next 18 to 20 years. Our government – indeed, most governments – should plan far into the future just as the expectant family does. We are already learning the primary lesson that the Canadians have learned. There is much more to the process than there are resources allocated to processing it.

    The EB-5 program represents a golden opportunity for both the U.S. economy and the Chinese EB-5 investors. It is truly a win-win program, but, if the processing remains as stagnated as it has been, neither the U.S. nor the Chinese investors will reap the full potential and benefits of the EB-5 program.

    The primary concern for the U.S. should be to get our EB-5 program operating with much more efficiency and integrity. We cannot afford to offer an incentive like EB-5 to foreign investors and then allow months to pass with little or no progress toward bringing their investment to fruition. Developers cannot afford to wait on EB-5 processing while they are trying to move forward expeditiously on their projects. And we can ill-afford to allow scamming of investors through EB-5 to continue. How the government addresses these issues is up to them. In the meantime, my focus will continue to be to help people involved in all aspects of the EB-5 program become highly successful.
  5. EB-5 Funding Ideal for U.S. Developers By Gregory Finkelson

    EB-5 Funding Ideal for U.S. Developers

    The common ingredient in every major development project is the need for funding. With an economy that is still reluctant to invest, the EB-5 program is the ideal way to fill the funding gap with high net worth, foreign business people desiring to immigrate to the U.S. by investing in multimillion dollar projects.

    Through the EB-5 program, individual investments of $1 million ($500,000 in certain circumstances) can be pooled to achieve the funding needed. Developers of projects that are, or businesses that will be, labor-intensive should give the EB-5 program a good look, because EB-5 investors must put their money into projects that create a minimum of 10 jobs per investor. Hotels, resorts, hospitals, assisted living facilities, industrial complexes, and casinos are ideal for obtaining EB-5 investment funding – for both the developer and the investor.

    For more information, contact American Corporate Services.
Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: