ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM


  1. Chairman of The Latino Coalition agrees with my DACA recommendation.

    The Hill: Rappaport Says: "Trump ended DACA in the most humane way possible." Hector Barreto, Chairman of the Latino Coalition Agrees!

    Nolan writes:

    “Former President Barack Obama established the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program five years ago with an executive order that granted temporary lawful status and work authorization to certain undocumented immigrants who had been brought to the United States as children.

    This was not a good idea. It only provided temporary relief and applicants had to admit alienage, concede unlawful presence, and provide their addresses to establish eligibility for the program, which has made it very easy to find them and rush them through removal proceedings.

    Instead of giving false hope to the young immigrants who participated in the program and heightening their risk of deportation, Obama should have worked on getting legislation passed that would have given them real lawful status and put them on a path to citizenship. Such bills are referred to as DREAM Acts, an acronym for “Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act.”

    That still is the only option that makes any sense.
    . . . .

    DACA advocates need to put aside any anger they have over the rescission of DACA and work on getting a DREAM Act passed.

    DREAM Acts have been pending in Congress since 2001, and we are yet to see one enacted. This is what led Obama to establish the DACA program administratively.

    A new approach is needed. One possibility would be to base eligibility on national interest instead of on a desire to help as many undocumented immigrants as possible, which is the approach taken by the recently introduced American Hope Act, H.R. 3591. It might more appropriately have been named, “The False Hope Act.”

    The solution is to find a way to help immigrants who were brought here as children that would be acceptable to both parties.”

    In a separate blog over on CNBC, Hector Barreto, Chairman of the Latino Coalition echoed Nolan:

    “The winding down of DACA is the perfect time for Congress to develop effective, compassionate policy on immigration – something most Americans strongly agree we need. The best reforms will be developed through the legislative process, not executive orders – and that’s something else both sides can agree on.

    In the meantime, leaders should stay away from inflammatory language and fear mongering. Mass deportations will not happen – it is simply not logistically possible, and it is not what the Trump Administration has called for. It is worth noting how Attorney General Sessions described the government’s next steps:

    The Department of Justice has advised the President and the Department of Homeland Security that DHS should begin an orderly, lawful wind down, including the cancellation of the memo that authorized this program. … This [wind down process] will enable DHS to conduct an orderly change and fulfill the desire of this administration to create a time period for Congress to act—should it so choose. We firmly believe this is the responsible path.

    Sessions’ words about a “wind down” were rational and calm, indicating an approach that is not drastic or dramatic, not gratuitously painful or overly political. The end of DACA and the beginning of lawful immigration reform can, and should, be handled with this level of maturity and respect – for dreamers for American citizens, and for our nation’s tradition of the rule of law.

    There are no easy or simple answers on immigration, and it’s okay for our leaders to acknowledge that fact. I believe they can find legislative solutions that strengthen America, recognize our proud immigrant tradition, keep the economy strong, and keep our citizens safe and our borders secure. The core elements of President George W. Bush’s immigration reform proposals, for example, met those goals through effective border security, a functioning and humane guest worker program, and a pathway to earned legal status for the undocumented. Given the six-month time frame Congress will have before DACA ends, they would do well to start their work with Bush’s already well-developed proposal.

    President Trump even Tweeted on Tuesday that he would revisit the issue if Congress cannot act.”

    Read Nolan’s and Hector’s blogs at their respective links above.

    I agree with Nolan’s “bottom line:”

    “The solution is to find a way to help immigrants who were brought here as children that would be acceptable to both parties.”

    Paul W. Schmidt’s blog site.

  2. Sessions' Worst DACA Misrepresentation of All Was Implying that Minority Immigrants Can't or Won't Assimilate. Roger Algase

    In his September 6 speech announcing Donald Trump's phasing out of DACA, Attorney General Jeff Sessions outdid himself in repeating racist falsehoods about immigrants in general, and about the DACA program in particular, which have become a staple of immigration opponents for the past two decades (after they succeeded in enacting IIRIRA in 1996) if not for the past half century, when the 1965 immigration reform law that the alt-right and its ideological predecessors who opposed immigration from outside Europe have never accepted was passed.

    Among Sessions' baseless accusations, as I pointed out in my own Immigration Daily blog comment that same day, were claims that immigration increases crime and makes America less safe, that DACA is illegal and unconstitutional as an open and shut matter (despite the strong arguments made for its legality, in, among other things, a letter to Trump signed by more than 100 immigration law professors); and, least tenable of all, the myth that DACA immigrants (or immigrants in general) steal jobs from American workers.

    But Sessions' speech also included an even worse patently false accusation, one that immigration opponents have been using for more than 100 years against Chinese, Jewish, Italian and many other unpopular immigrant groups - namely that today's immigrants don't want to assimilate or have problems assimilating to American "culture".

    As the grandchild of Jewish immigrants who came to America from Eastern Europe around the last decade of the 19th century, when the great wave of Jewish immigration was just beginning that lasted for the next three decades until it was cut off by the bigoted, anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic and anti-Asian 1924 immigration law that Sessions had such high praise for less than three years ago (as mentioned in my earlier comment) I am old enough to remember personally how common this despicable accusation was against Jewish immigrants not so many years ago.

    I also remember the deliberately ironic reference that the composer Leonard Bernstein make to this canard in his famous musical: Candide, which contained a song (about Jews during the Inquisition) with the refrain:

    "I am easily assimilated."

    I would respectfully point out to Mr. Sessions that being easily assimilated is just as true of the overwhelming majority of today's Mexican, Muslim, Asian, and all the other non-European immigrants whom he and the president are so eager to keep out of or deport from the US now, as it was true then about the Jewish, Italian, Asian, East European and other non "Nordic" immigrants who were stigmatized by white supremacist politicians of that period as "unfit" or "unable to assimilate" almost a century ago, when the openly bigoted 1924 immigration law that Sessions (and Adolf Hitler, 90 years earlier) praised so highly was enacted.

    For a link to the full text of Sessions' DACA speech, including his remarks about the alleged need to reduce or cut off immigration in order to give (mainly -non-European) immigrants who are already in the US time to "assimilate", see my September 6 Immigration Daily blog comment.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law

    Updated 09-09-2017 at 04:01 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: