ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

description

  1. Gallup poll: Immigration a Top Problem for Republicans, Not for Democrats

    Story Highlights


    • Dissatisfaction with government is top problem overall

    • Immigration ties with government as the top problem among Republicans
    • 16% of Republicans vs. 4% of Democrats name immigration as top problem

    WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Partisan differences are clearly visible in Americans' assessments of themost important problem facing the country. Dissatisfaction with government ranks at or near the top of the list of the country's most important problems for both Republicans (16%) and Democrats(30%), though the percentages differ substantially. But while immigration ties dissatisfaction with government as the top problem among Republicans, it appears much lower on the list amongDemocrats.

    Mentions of immigration among Republicans and independents who lean toward the GOP are up to16% from 9% last month, while just 4% of Democrats and Democratic leaners mention immigrationas the most important problem. Immigration-related issues are at the center of congressionalleaders' ongoing efforts to reach a budget deal and avoid a federal government shutdown.

    Read more at http://news.gallup.com/poll/225473/i...?version=print

    Submitted by Nolan Rappaport

    Updated 01-17-2018 at 04:51 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

  2. Sessions Praised 1924 Europe-Only Immigration Law. Now He Says US Should be More Like Canada (Where Most Migrants Are From Asia/Africa). Roger Algase

    In 2015, as a Senator, Jeff Sessions, who is now Trump's attorney general, had high praise for a 1924 immigration law which, based on the discredited "Eugenics" theory of white racial superiority which Adolf Hitler espoused, was heavily skewed toward immigration from the "Nordic" countries of northern Europe and cut off immigration from the rest of the world almost entirely.

    Indeed Hitler, writing some 90 years before Sessions in Mein Kampf, claimed to have been inspired by that law.

    On January 16, however, Sessions told Fox News that America should have an immigration system more like Canada, which, according to the him, accepts immigrants based more on education and ability than the US does.

    http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...ept-immigrants

    Either Sessions has had a radical change of heart from the time only three years ago when he praised the racially bigoted 1924 Johnson Reed immigration act, or else he may be unaware that immigrants from Europe are a small minority in Canada, down to 11.6 percent of all immigrants in 2016, an even smaller percentage than immigrants from Africa, which Canada obviously does not consider to be a "shithole" (or "shithouse" - I want be sure to quote the US president correctly), part of the world.

    By far the largest percentage of immigrants to Canada are from Asia.

    https://nationaleconomicseditorial.c...ce-immigrants/

    If Sessions is indeed aware of the fact that the ethnic makeup of Canada's immigrant population is a far cry from that of the northern-Europe paradigm in the 1924 "national origins" immigration law which Sessions held up as an ideal in his "Immigration Handbook for Senate Republicans" only three years ago, he may just want to go and have a friendly chat with his boss, Donald Trump, who on January 11 said that America needs immigrants from "countries like Norway", not from Africa or Haiti.

    Sessions and other supporters of the RAISE Act, which would give preference to parts of the world such as Europe where English is widely understood and higher education widely available, while ending extended family immigration and the visa lottery which benefit mainly non-white immigrants from other parts of the world, may think that their proposals will make America's immigration system white again - as it was between 1924 and 1964.

    But if America really becomes more like Canada with regard to immigration, supporters of the white supremacist immigration system which Donald Trump endorsed on January 11 (and has since unconvincingly tried to walk back from) may regret what they wished for.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law

    Updated 01-17-2018 at 08:05 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

  3. DHS Secretary Brings America Closer to Fascist Rule by Ramping up Threat to Prosecute Sanctuary City Officials. Roger Algase

    America may be moving closer to actual fascist rule, as the campaign by top DHS officials to squelch any opposition to Trump's mass arrest and deportation agenda aimed at expelling millions of Latin American, Asian, Middle Eastern and African immigrants went into even higher gear than before on January 16.

    In my January 5 ilw.com comment, I discussed the threat by acting ICE Director Thomas Homan to have Sanctuary City officials prosecuted for the crime of "harboring" or "assisting" unauthorized immigrants if these officials refuse to cooperate with the DHS in carrying out this form of what amounts to ethnic cleansing. See my blog comment:

    ICE Director's Threat of Criminal Charges Against Sanctuary City Officials Undermines Democracy and Assists Trump's Authoritarian Agenda

    http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?10319

    On January 16, the Washington Times reported that DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen told the Senate Judiciary Committee that her Department has asked federal prosecutors to see if they can file criminal charges against Sanctuary City officials who refuse to cooperate with DHS deportation activities, and that the Department of Justice is "reviewing what avenues may be available".

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-city-leaders/

    See also:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...y-leaders.html

    Even before the Trump administration took office, Attorney General designate Jeff Sessions, who as a Senator in 2015 authored an "Immigration Handbook for Congressional Republicans" that praised the same openly white supremacist 1924 "national origins" immigration act which Adolf Hitler wrote about admiringly some 90 years earlier in Mein Kampf, also raised the specter of prosecuting Sanctuary officials who don't fall into lockstep behind Trump's program of expelling and excluding millions of immigrants who don't happen to come from white countries such as Norway, which Trump said on January 11 that he wants to favor over dark skinned African and Caribbean countries.

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-cities-if-co/

    The federal laws against "harboring" and "assisting" unauthorized immigrants are extremely broad, and could be interpreted to apply to anyone, including an American citizen, who provides any kind of help or benefit, such as shelter, medical or legal services, or even failing to report such a person to the authorities for deportation, to an immigrant who is in the US without legal permission.

    The threats of prosecution against Sanctuary officials by top Trump administration officials could be only the beginning of a program to fill up America's jails with anyone who opposes or speaks out against Trump's deportation agenda. The road leading from mass deportation and exclusion of non-white immigrants from what Trump calls "shithole" (or "shithouse") countries to full-blown fascism in America may be much shorter - and closer - than most Americans would like to think.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law


    Updated 01-16-2018 at 08:35 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

  4. From Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" Speech to Trump's DREAMERS Betrayal and Racism Against Non-White Immigrants. Roger Algase

    Fifty-five years ago, in 1963, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. one of the greatest Americans in all of our history, and whose birthday we celebrate today, gave his immortal "I Have a Dream" speech as part of the famous civil rights "March on Washington".

    I was not present at that speech and I never had the privilege of meeting Dr. King or hearing him speak in person. But, as a young Harvard Law School graduate working in the law office of Dr. King's close friend and adviser, attorney Clarence B. Jones, I had the privilege of forming a small connection of my own with this speech.

    I prepared the application to copyright the speech as part of a lawsuit filed on Dr. King's behalf by Mr. Jones' office over the right to use the speech for commercial purposes, and I also assisted in a very small way in the drafting the complaint in that lawsuit (King v. Mr. Maestro, 224 F. Supp. 101 SDNY, 1963).

    While Dr. King was successful in that case, and Judge Inzer Wyatt's decision showed Dr. King a great deal of respect, I will never forget the condescending way in which the Judge described Dr. King at the beginning of his ruling as follows:

    "Plaintiff, a highly educated negro clergyman..."

    The implication, at least as I interpret it, is that it was unusual for a black person to be highly educated at that time, and it no doubt was, given the fact that racial segregation laws were still in force in many Southern states and the 1965 Voting Rights Act had not yet been enacted.

    Though immigration was not a well publicized legal or political issue as it is now - I do not remember hearing the word "immigration" used even once during the entire time I was in law school - the openly racist, white Europeans only, 1924 "National Origins" Immigration Act was still the law of the land. It was not repealed until 1965, two years later.

    But it would be fair to say that America was profoundly changed by Dr. King's "I have a Dream" speech. With that speech, his dream of racial equality for all people became part of America's culture and society - as a legitimate aspiration. This was despite the fierce opposition and persecution that he encountered at the hands of white supremacists, including some within the US government, who labelled him as a "demagogue" and even a "communist sympathizer", ultimately leading to his assassination in 1968.

    On January 12, Donald Trump, as president of the United States, in an official holiday statement, paid homage to Dr. King and his ideal of the equality of all people, regardless of race or country of birth - before "celebrating" the holiday of Dr. King's birthday on January 15 by playing golf at one of Trump's own resorts!

    But is the president following Dr. King's spirit of racial justice and equality today? Sadly, the answer has to be that, rather than following Dr. King, Trump is trying to undo the progress toward racial equality which Dr. King gave his life for. Trump is making it more difficult to reach a DACA solution for today's DREAMERS by insisting on measures such as eliminating the visa lottery and sharply reducing family immigration as a quid pro quo.

    Trump has also made clear that, in his view, black immigrants are unwelcome in the US and only white, northern European European ones should be admitted. This is a blatant effort to return to the spirit of the bigoted "Nordics" only 1924 immigration law which Trump's attorney general, Jeff Sessions praised so highly as a Senator in his 2015 Immigration Handbook for Congressional Republicans, and which Adolf Hitler claimed to have been inspired by nine decades earlier in his own infamous "handbook" known to the world as Mein Kampf.

    To be continued.

    Updated 01-16-2018 at 03:50 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

  5. "Shithole" Slur Against Black Immigrants Recalls Racist 1924 Law, Shows Authoritarianism and Undermines Integrity of Adjudications. Roger Algase

    On January 12, Donald Trump issued a statement in honor of Martin Luther King Jr. including the following words which will be welcomed by all Americans who believe in racial justice and equality:

    "Today we celebrate Dr. King for standing up for the self-evident truth that Americas hold so dear, that no matter what the color of our skin, or the place of our birth, we are all created equal by God."

    Trump did not say whether his laudable comment about all people being equal regardless of their place of birth applies to immigrants from Haiti or African "shithole countries." as in his widely reported January 11 remarks which have created a storm of worldwide condemnation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...37928?lo=ap_f1

    See also: The Guardian:

    'There's no other word but racist'

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...untries-remark

    Meanwhile, academics have been pointing out the connection between Trump's comment that America needs immigrants from Norway, rather than Haiti and Africa, and the openly racist 1924 Johnson Reed immigration act which Trump himself may not have yet had time to bone up on while reportedly spending many hours watching Fox News and other TV channels every day, but which the RAISE Act authors, Senator's Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and David Perdue (R-Georgia) must undoubtedly be familiar with, and which Trump's own AG, Jeff Sessions, had high praise for as a Senator in 2015 (along with Adolf Hitler, writing in Mein Kampf nine decades earlier).

    For example, Ana Minian, assistant professor of history at Stanford University, is quoted by vox.com as saying the following about Trump's Janusry 11 "shithole" statement:

    "What he [Trump] said was basically a form of eugenics - in which he's saying, 'This is the population we want: people from places like Norway.' White people. We don't want people from African countries or from Haiti. That's what's really symbolic here."

    She then goes on to discuss how Trump's comment related to the openly racist 1924 "national origins" immigration act.

    "What is also an important takeaway out of this message from Trump is that it takes us back to an earlier period, 1924, when the National Origins Act passed...

    It [the 1924 act] gave a percentage of allowances for people to come, giving preference to Northern Europe, discriminating against Southern and Eastern Europe, and completely barring immigration from Asia."

    Professor Minian also states:

    "In 1965 we moved away from this National Origins Act, and part of what it means to say 'we don't want people from these countries' is moving back to that very racist law that existed."

    https://www.vox.com/2018/1/12/168824...uotas-eugenics

    Of course, it is not just a few execrable (no pun intended!) words that Trump said on January 11 that are taking this country back to the bigoted days of the 1924 immigration act, but his entire whites-only immigration agenda.

    Abolishing the Diversity Visa lottery, which has been exceptionally helpful to African immigrants, and limiting family immigration to the immediate nuclear family, which would sharply reduce immigration from all areas of the world outside Europe (and very possibly in some parts of Europe as well - talk about "collateral damage"), and passing the RAISE Act, which would limit immigration to people from countries where English is widely understood and college education widely available - i.e. Europe, is just another way of skewing America's immigration system in favor of white immigrants and against immigrants from "shithole countries", i.e. non-white ones.

    By making his horrific, bigoted statement on January 11, the president merely took the fig leaf away from the real purpose of his entire anti-immigrant agenda, and made clear for the entire world to see that not only the proposals mentioned above, but also his actions as president - the Muslim Ban, DACA cancellation, TPS cancellations, mass deportation dragnet and "Hire American" attacks on the same, predominantly Asian, skilled immigrants whom Trump claims to be favoring in his "Merit-Based" RAISE Act are not aimed at Making America Great Again, but at Making America White Again.

    What is especially alarming about Trump's immigration comments is not only the obvious and crude racial bigotry, at the heart of his entire immigration agenda, which Trump openly expressed on January 11 in the course of rejecting any DACA solution that does not include his whites-only immigration proposals mentioned above (as well as his Border Wall of humiliation directed against Mexican and other Latin American immigrants), but the authoritarian way in which he claims the right to impose this bigoted agenda on America merely by holding the office of president.

    On January 14, Trump tweeted the following:

    "I, as President, want people coming into our Country who are going to help us become strong and great again, people coming in though a system based on MERIT. No more Lotteries! #AMERICA FIRST'"

    Look at the first words: "I, as President, want people coming into our country who...".

    To be sure, the executive branch has great power over immigration, but not the power to write the immigration laws. This power belongs only to Congress, not the Will of the Leader, as in in Russia, North Korea or Nazi Germany.

    There was also another leader who wanted only "strong" people in his country. The world knows what he did with the "weak" ones. The above slogan "America First" was once the rallying cry of that leader's supporters in the United States. His name was Adolf Hitler.

    See: Washington Post, January 20, 2017:

    President Trump's 'America First' slogan was popularized by Nazi sympathizers.

    (I do not have a link - please use Google to access,)

    This is not to say that the president of the United States is anti-Semitic or a Nazi sympathizer himself. Certainly, he is not. But his above words have quasi-fascist associations that imply danger ahead for America's democracy.

    So does his white supremacist immigration agenda, as summarized in his openly racist January 11 remarks which, as the above The Guardian news article describes, have drawn world-wide condemnation.

    There is also another, more immediate danger to our society and to the rule of law in the president's bigoted comment about African and Haitian immigrants. This involves compromising the independence and integrity of our legal immigration system.

    Both immigrants and American citizens who may be sponsoring them for legal visas or green cards have the right to assume that their applications or petitions will be adjudicated fairly, based only on the law and facts of each case, by immigration examiners.

    But what happens now if an applicant or petition beneficiary is from Haiti or Africa, regions which Trump has now designated as "shitholes" and which he obviously means to rule out by calling for "Merit-based" immigration which will make America "Strong" and "Great"?

    Everyone in America, including immigration examiners, knows that these are are just code words for "White".

    How much fairness and freedom from political control of adjudications and Haitians, Africans, or any other non-white applicants/beneficiaries hope for from immigration examiners who know that the head of the government which pays their salaries and puts food on their table does not want these particular people in the country under any circumstances because of the countries they come from and the color of their skins?

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    algaselex@gmail.com

    Updated 01-14-2018 at 09:33 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

Page 2 of 275 FirstFirst 12341252102 ... LastLast
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: