ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Blog Comments

  1. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    It's more meaningful from an enforcement standpoint to distinguish between removing aliens trying to get into the country and aliens who are already here, i.e., the 11 million undocumented aliens currently living in the US. I address Trump's progress on this front in an article I submitted to The Hill a few minutes ago. The following is from that article:

    "Deporting the aliens in this group (aliens trying to get into The country) who do not establish eligibility for relief from deportation will prevent them from increasing the undocumented alien population, but it won’t reduce the size of that population. That requires removal of aliens who are living in the United States, i.e., interior enforcement, which is handled by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).


    ICE deportations have dropped by almost 50 percent in the last five years. In October 2012, ICE deported 34,543 individuals. By December 2016 that figure had declined to 20,833. And in October 2017, only 18,428 were deported.


    Trump has not reversed this trend. ICE only deported 156,071 aliens from February 2017 to October 2017. At that rate, it would take more than 70 years to remove the 11 million undocumented aliens who are living in the United States."

    I predict that Trump will concentrate on getting more interior removals, which necessarily will include may noncriminal aliens.

    Nolan Rappaport
  2. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Matthew, did you look at the qualifications required to be an immigration judge? Do you think they are adequate?

    Nolan Rappaport
  3. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by MKolken
    Looking forward to reading it.
    Immigration judge quotas will not eliminate the backlog crisis (April 4, 2018), http://thehill.com/opinion/immigrati...backlog-crisis

    Nolan Rappaport
  4. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    I think you are missing the point of concern about crime committed by illegal aliens. The point is that they aren't supposed to be here. If the law were to be enforced more effectively, fewer illegal aliens would be committing crimes here.

    Nolan Rappaport
  5. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    It's a pleasure to see someone reporting on the good things that the Trump administration is doing with respect to immigration enforcement.

    It wasn't that long ago when the Democrats were opposed to illegal immigration. Can anyone tell me when they did an about face on that issue and why they did it?

    Nolan Rappaport
  6. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    I would agree with the ABA President but for the fact that the immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals have done such a poor job. They need more supervision, not more independence.

    If you want to know why I say that, see my article, "Immigration judge quotas will not eliminate the backlog crisis" (April 4, 2018),
    http://thehill.com/opinion/immigrati...backlog-crisis

    Nolan Rappaport
  7. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by MKolken
    This really isn't anything new. 52% of ALL federal criminal prosecutions under Obama were immigration related crimes.
    It's not new to you or to me, but I don't think many people realize that entry without inspection is a crime and that two or more entries make it a felony.

    If Trump plans to prosecute first time entries, which are only a misdemeanor, he is likely to incarcerate the aliens found guilty at military bases. That apparently is his plan to be able to provide the additional bed space needed to end catch and release.

    If Trump gets serious about enforcement, we will see much greater military involvement for detention as well as to assist CBP at the border. As Dylan said, "The times, they are a changing."

    Nolan Rappaport
  8. MKolken's Avatar
    This really isn't anything new. 52% of ALL federal criminal prosecutions under Obama were immigration related crimes.
  9. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Catch and release was just starting when I was an immigration counsel on the Judiciary Committee. Border communities were having a fit over the release of so many undocumented aliens. The aliens were committing crimes and causing other problems.

    INS got the brilliant idea of giving them bus tickets and sending them on their way to the interior of the country where the would disappear rapidly, i.e., the complaints would stop.

    A congressman showed a video at a Judiciary hearing showing INS taking them to a bus station.

    Administrations ever since have pledged to stop the practice, but they haven't had detention space for all of the ones who were being released. Trump has solved that problem. They will be kept at military bases near the border.

    Nolan Rappaport
    Updated 04-09-2018 at 06:15 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  10. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Matthew,

    I know most of the ILW.com readers will view this as another outrageous attempt to persecute undocumented aliens. In fact though, Congress made it a serious criminal offense with the following INA provisions, which, incidentally, were enacted long before Trump became a politician. Nolan Rappaport

    8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien




    (a)Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of factsAny alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.


    (b)Improper time or place; civil penaltiesAny alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of—(1)at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or

    (2)twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection.

    Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.

    (c)Marriage fraudAny individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000, or both.


    (d)Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraudAny individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.










  11. MKolken's Avatar
    I have two clients who enrolled at this same "university" created by DHS. Both clients believed that the University of Northern New Jersey was a real school, and ended up falling out of status as a result of our own government's deception, couple with trusting unscrupulous individuals looking to profit off of the desperation of immigrants. Both of my clients had immigration court proceedings instituted against them, and NEITHER were charged with fraud. One now has a green card, the other is on their way.

    Moreover, if an individual is willing to give their life serving our country they should be forgiven for what is tantamount to a speeding ticket. And yes, I DO equate a mere overstay to a speeding ticket. It is an offense that is malum prohibita, not malum per se, requires no specific intent, and is not in any way morally reprehensible.
    Updated 04-06-2018 at 08:05 AM by MKolken
  12. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Are you sure the directive applies to aliens who have committed visa fraud? Certainly, it wasn't intended to be an absolute, no exception mandate. What if the alien was a human trafficker or a terrorist? Surely you wouldn't say they were covered by the directive.

    Or is it that you don't consider visa fraud a serious matter? I don't know what kind of visa fraud was involved, but fraud involving visas is a serious criminal offense. See https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1546

    Nolan Rappaport
  13. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    For a warning that this latest attempt to pressure immigration judges into rushed decision-making in cases involving immigrants who are not given enough time to obtain legal representation or prepare their cases properly, all in support of Trump's racial agenda of speeding up deportations, could backfire by clogging up the federal courts with even more immigration-related lawsuits, see Amanda Marcotte's article in Salon.com (April 4):

    Jeff Sessions' new "quotas" for immigration judges: Pathway to mass deportation?

    https://www.salon.com/2018/04/04/jef...s-deportation/

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 04-04-2018 at 09:58 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  14. MKolken's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by ImmigrationLawBlogs
    Excellent summary. I am working on an article about this plan right now that is scheduled to be published tomorrow. I explain why this plan won't work.

    Nolan Rappaport
    Looking forward to reading it.
  15. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    For a discussion about the concerns expressed by two distinguished immigration judges, including retired judge Paul Schmidt, about this latest assault on due process and the rule of law in immigration cases by the Trump administration, see my April 3 Immigration Daily comment:

    http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?10483

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law


    Updated 04-03-2018 at 01:37 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  16. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Excellent summary. I am working on an article about this plan right now that is scheduled to be published tomorrow. I explain why this plan won't work.

    Nolan Rappaport
  17. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Is this kind of prolonged or indefinite incarceration of Latino or other minority immigrants part of a plan by Donald Trump to make America white again, or is there some other rationale?

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
  18. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    And for a summary of Justice Breyer's dissenting opinion by alternet.org writer Steven Rosenfeld, and an explanation of why Rosenfeld calls the majority decision

    "An authoritarian ruling [which] enlarges federal police power and ignores centuries of judicial precedent and human rights"

    see:

    https://www.alternet.org/immigration...-can-be-jailed

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
  19. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    What will be in the next set of instructions to Immigration Judges issued under the authority of the Trump/Sessions Justice Department?

    A memo ordering Immigration Judges to treat all children appearing before them with extreme suspicion?

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
  20. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    I wonder if they realize how dangerous hunger strikes are, or how futile what they are doing is.

    Incidentally, has anyone heard of a case in which a former DREAMER has been deported?

    Nolan Rappaport
Page 1 of 32 12311 ... LastLast
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: