ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Recent Blogs Posts

  1. Placement of STEM OPT Workers in Third-Party Client/Customer Sites is Barred

    By: Bruce Buchanan Sebelist Buchanan Law



    In a below the radar move, the USCIS has updated its webpage for Science, Technology, Engineering, or Mathematics (STEM) Optional Practical Training (OPT) to reflect a ban on the placement of STEM OPT workers at third-party client/customer sites. In doing so, the USCIS is relying upon a March 11, 2016 final rule amending regulations to expand OPT for students with U.S. degrees in STEM. The rule included new provisions to obtain a 24-month STEM OPT extension including, each STEM OPT student must prepare and execute with their prospective employer a formal training plan that identifies learning objectives and a plan for achieving training objectives, and the employer must agree to announced and unannounced Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) site visits to employer locations where STEM OPT students are employed.

    Although the new rule does not prohibit placement of students at third-party worksites, the USCIS states the DHS/ICE site visit provision is the basis for the new prohibition. USCIS’s website states:
    The training experience must take place on-site at the employer’s place of business or worksite(s) to which U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has authority to conduct employer site visits to ensure that the employer is meeting program requirements. This means that ICE must always have access to a student’s worksite; if the student is sent to different worksite locations as part of the training opportunity, ICE must be able to access such worksite locations. For instance, the training experience may not take place at the place of business or worksite of the employer’s clients or customers because ICE would lack authority to visit such sites.

    The change in the website did not provide any explanation as to why DHS/ICE lacks the authority to conduct a site visit on the premises of a third-party client if that client site had been clearly listed on an approved Form I-983 training application. The Form I-983 training application sets forth that DHS may, at its discretion, conduct a site visit. It would be reasonable to conclude that by listing a third-party client site as the student’s work location on the I-983, that the worksite is open to a site visit by ICE.

    Why would the USCIS update its website with no prior notice and no opportunity for comment? Great question without an answer. Hopefully, DHS will provide an answer but don’t count on it. If they do, I will report in a future blog article.

    Updated 05-10-2018 at 09:29 AM by BBuchanan

  2. Trump Administration Makes Anti-Immigrant Cruelty Official: Will Separate Families at Border; Prosecute Parents. Roger Algase

    The Los Angeles Times reports on May 7 that in Trump's latest strategy of making attacks on Mexican, Central American and other non-white immigrants the centerpiece of his presidency, the administration has now made it official that families entering the US anywhere other than at an authorized border crossing point will be separated and the parents will be prosecuted for illegal entry while the children are placed in juvenile detention centers.

    http://latimes.com/politics/la-na-po...507-story.html

    The ostensible reason for this inhuman policy is to steer immigrants requesting asylum at the border to authorized border crossing points where their claims will be duly processed. However, the problem with this policy, as former INS Commissioner Doris Meissner points out, is that many border stations are ill-equipped to handle the surge in new asylum cases.

    She stated:

    "They are strongly incentivizing serious bottlenecks at the ports of entry, and maybe they're doing that on purpose."

    Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, and immigrant afvocacy group, put it more bluntly:

    "It's clear this administration wants to use families who are fleeing violence as pawns in a larger strategy to end immigration to the U.S."

    Noorani's warning shows that, while this latest move toward violations of basic human rights that are more typical of authoritarian regimes than democratic ones may appear to concern "illegal" immigrants only, it is part of a larger administration policy of regarding all immigrants, in every category, legal as well as unauthorized, as inherently undesirable and unwanted in the US; and keeping them out or expelling them by any means possible, no matter how cruel and vindictive.

    Unless they are from "Countries Like Norway", that is.
    _________________________
    Roger Algase is a New York immigration lawyer and a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School. He has been helping mainly skilled and professional immigrants from diverse parts of the world receive work visas and green cards for more than 35 years. Roger's email address is algaselex@gmail.com

    Updated 05-09-2018 at 09:47 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: