ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Recent Blogs Posts

  1. Judge Orders Trump to Turn Over Giuliani Memo Allegedly Showing That Muslim Entry Ban was Based on Religion, not Nationality. Roger Algase

    In a May 11 story, Bloomberg reports that a federal judge in Detroit, Victoria Roberts, has ordered the Trump administration to turn over a memo drafted under the guidance of Rudy Giuliani which allegedly outlined a way to make Trump's proposed ban on entry to the US from selected almost 100 per cent Muslim Countries (often misleading called a "Travel Ban" by the media - Trump's memos ban much more than that) look as if it was not directed against the Muslim religion, but only against certain nationalities.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...ravel-ban-suit

    According to the Bloomberg report, a court filing by the Arab American Civil Rights League in the lawsuit before Judge Roberts alleges the following:

    "While running for president, Donald Trump asked Giuliani to form a commission that would help draft a 'Muslim ban' to 'show him the right way to do it legally'...The commission then recommended that 'nationality be used as a proxy for religion' ..."

    If this memo is ever actually produced, and if it shows that the above allegation is accurate, this would be one more piece in the already large and apparently still growing jigsaw puzzle of bad faith on the part of the president in promulgating the entry ban orders and attempting to defend the latest one in the US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

    It should not come as any surprise that the president is so desperate to claim unlimited executive power to bar anyone he wants from coming to the US under the mantle of INA Section 212(f) and to resist any effort by the courts to hold him to the basic requirement of good faith set forth by the Supreme Court in Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972).

    The egregious lack of good faith shown by the history of Trump's latest six Muslim country ban is also discussed at length in the amicus brief of constitutional law scholars filed with the 4th Circuit which I refer to in my May 11 ilw.com comment

    http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9889-President

    It is also worthy of note that this would not be the first time in US immigration law history that barring immigrants based "national origin" has been used as a pretext for doing so on the basis of religion or ethnicity.

    One need look no further than the notorious "national origins" Immigration Act of 1924, whose legislative history showed beyond any possible doubt (as virtually all historians agree) that nationality was only an excuse to bar unwanted Jews, Catholics and most of the world's other non-"Nordic" immigrants from coming to the United States.
    __________________________________
    Roger Algase is a New York immigration lawyer and a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School. For more than 35 years, Roger has been helping mainly skilled and professional immigrants receive work visas and green cards without regard to their religion, ethnicity or national origin. Roger's email address is algaselex@gmail.com

    Updated 05-19-2017 at 07:49 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

  2. 68% of ICE’s Recent Gang Member Arrests Were US Citizens

    by , 05-12-2017 at 06:24 AM (Matthew Kolken on Deportation And Removal)
    Via Latino Rebels:

    The Trump administration is telling us all that thousands and thousands of immigrant gang members are overrunning the country with murder and rape. But ICE’s own statistics confirm that these charges represented just 2% of the arrests. And in the end, this high-profile operation arrested 445 foreign nationals, a number less than the 933 U.S. citizens. In addition, there are very generic about the “remaining 280” who “were arrested on administrative immigration violations.”

    Click here for the rest of the article.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: