ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Recent Blogs Posts

  1. Infosys Agrees to Pay $1 million for Visa Violations

    By Bruce Buchanan, Sebelist Buchanan Law PLLC

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Infosys_logo.svg.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	16.2 KB 
ID:	1203

    Infosys, an Indian IT services company, has agreed to pay $1 million to settle an investigation by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman into its visa violations. Infosys failed to obtain the appropriate visa for foreign workers employed in New York. Infosys’ foreign workers held temporary B-1 visas instead of H-1B work permits. Visitor (B-1) visas are not subject to a cap and are much easier to obtain than H-1B visas.

    The foreign nationals, holding B-1 visas, were not paid the prevailing wage that H-1B workers must be paid. Thus, New York stated Infosys owed taxes on the higher wages that should have been paid to Infosys employees and that its employees were in violation of their visa terms. Infosys stated the investigation centered on alleged paperwork errors and denied wrongdoing.

    As readers may recall, in 2013, Infosys paid $34 million to the federal government to resolve allegations that it committed visa fraud and I-9 violations. The New York matter was an outgrowth of the same misdeeds of Infosys.
  2. MU LAW IS NOW ON LINKED IN

    by , 07-11-2017 at 02:00 PM (Chris Musillo on Nurse and Allied Health Immigration)
    MU Law has a vibrant social media presence, which now includes Linked In.

    If you are on Linked In, please take a moment a follow MU Law on Linked In. We will be cross-posting articles and items of interest.

    We also have 1000+ followers on Facebook. Are you one of our followers? If not, please follow us there too!

    MU Law on Facebook

    MU Law on Linked In
  3. 10 States to Trump: End DACA or We’ll Sue You!

    Although many people see President Trump as the most anti-immigrant President in recent history, to others, he is not anti-immigrant enough.


    In a memo issued on June 15, 2017, DHS Secretary John Kelley rescinded the Obama Administration's memorandum expanding the DACA program and creating the DAPA program for certain parents of US citizens. However, the memo declared that the original DACA program created in 2012 for children who were brought to the US at a young age by their parents “will remain in place”.


    On June 29, the Attorneys General of Texas and 9 other states (Arkansas, Alabama, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia) sent a letter to US Attorney General Jeff Sessions threatening to bring an action in Federal Court to declare that the DACA program is unconstitutional unless the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) phases out the program.


    [sc name="Review Block" image="/images/photo6.gif" title="Know Their Job Well And Perform It Flawlessly" review="Don’t do the mistake we did and try to save few bucks going with nonprofessionals and sole practitioners! It will end up not only costing you much more in the long run, but also putting your status in jeopardy which can have a priceless impact. It is one of the most important steps in your life." reviewer="- Sgt. Danny Lightfoot, Los Angeles, California"]


    The letter demands that DHS rescind the 2012 memorandum which created DACA, and not renew or issue any DACA permits in the future. If DHS does so by September 5, the letter states that the plaintiffs will voluntarily dismiss their lawsuit.


    However, if the DHS does not do so, the letter states that the complaint challenging DAPA and the expanded DACA program in Texas v. United States will be amended to include the existing DACA program.


    Both the DAPA and expanded DACA programs have been enjoined by the Federal Courts. The Supreme Court has remanded the case to the District Court Judge in Texas to rule on the merits of the case.


    The bottom line is that these 10 Attorney Generals want the DACA program to be abolished thereby making the nearly 800,000 Dreamers who benefit from DACA undocumented aliens once again, subject to deportation.


    How did Attorney General Sessions react to the threatening letter? Was he offended?


    Apparently not.


    On “Fox and Friends”, Sessions stated: “… I like it that our states and localities are holding our federal government to account, expecting us to do what is our responsibility to the state and locals, and that’s to enforce the law.”


    Will President Trump cave in and end the DACA program? If he does, Dreamers will be an easy target for DHS to deport since the government has each of their addresses.


    There are some limited options for certain DACA recipients to apply for green cards before the program is rescinded or struck down by the Supreme Court a couple of years from now.


    But for the majority of DACA recipients, the best post-DACA plan of action may be to change their addresses.


    And is it even remotely possible that Congress would pass a law to protect the Dreamers? Perhaps, but only if they are pressured by their constituents to do so.


    Stay tuned!
  4. Federal Judge: Jailing Refugee Children is Fundamentally Wrong on So Many Levels

    by , 07-11-2017 at 09:21 AM (Matthew Kolken on Deportation And Removal)
    Judge Dean D. Pregerson stated the obvious: jailing refugee children is “fundamentally wrong on so many levels.” I will update you as soon as a decision is rendered.

    Via Latino Rebels:

    Monday morning in a Los Angeles federal courtroom, Judge Dean D. Pregerson became the first judge of any kind (federal, immigration or state) to give a hearing to four Central American children (ages 3, 4, 8 and 16) who have been detained at Berks Family Prison for the past two years. The children all have approved Special Immigrant Juvenile Status petitions, which means that the federal government has affirmed that they are vulnerable children who have been abused, neglected or abandoned, and they qualify for “green cards” on that basis. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has taken the position that, essentially, the children can be detained and deported up until the moment that they have their green cards in hand. Attorneys for the children argued that this violates a consent decree entered into by the government.

    Click here for the rest of the article courtesy of immigration lawyer Amy Maldonado.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: