ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Recent Blogs Posts

  1. Letters of the Week: May 21 - May 25

  2. DOJ and USCIS Formalize Partnership to Protect U.S. Workers from Discrimination and Combat Fraud

    By: Bruce Buchanan, Sebelist Buchanan Law



    The Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have agreed on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that expands their collaboration to better detect and eliminate fraud, abuse, and discrimination by employers bringing foreign visa workers to the United States.

    The MOU will increase the ability of the agencies to share information and help identify, investigate, and prosecute employers who may be discriminating against U.S. workers and/or violating immigration laws. In 2010, USCIS and the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division entered into an ongoing partnership to share information about E-Verify misuse and combat employment discrimination, and this MOU expands upon the two agencies’ existing partnership.

    To advance the goals of the Buy American and Hire American Executive Order, in 2017, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ launched the Protecting U.S. Workers Initiative, which is aimed at targeting, investigating, and taking enforcement actions against companies that discriminate against U.S. workers in favor of foreign visa workers. Under this Initiative, the Civil Rights Division has opened dozens of investigations, filed one lawsuit, and reached settlement agreements with two employers.
  3. Enforcing Trump's immigration plan will be harder than he thinks. By Nolan Rappaport


    © Getty

    Trump inherited a number of immigration enforcement problems from the Obama administration, the most serious of which was an immigration court backlog that has prevented him from using removal proceedings to reduce the size of the undocumented alien population.

    His solution seems to be to heed the advice of Mitt Romney, who said, when asked about reducing the population of undocumented aliens during a debate in 2012:

    “The answer is self-deportation, which is people decide they can do better by going home because they can't find work here because they don't have legal documentation to allow them to work here.”

    But Trump is using harboring prosecutions to discourage people from helping undocumented aliens to remain here illegally in addition to enforcing employer sanctions to discourage employers from giving them jobs.

    Neither is likely to be successful.

    Read more at http://thehill.com/opinion/immigrati...than-he-thinks

    About the author. Nolan Rappaport was detailed to the House Judiciary Committee as an executive branch immigration law expert for three years; he subsequently served as an immigration counsel for the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims for four years. Prior to working on the Judiciary Committee, he wrote decisions for the Board of Immigration Appeals for 20 years.






  4. Trump Moves Toward Dictatorship: Threatens to Ruin WP/Amazon Chief's Business, Prosecute Oakland Mayor, for Opposing Immigration Agenda. Roger Algase

    Update, May 20 at 10:15 am:

    A May 18 comment on the site alternet.org by Cody Fenwick focuses on the dangerous abuse of power when a chief executive singles out a specific company for government retaliation because the president doesn't like being criticized. In an article entitled:

    Trump's Corrupt Abuse of Power on Display in New Report About His Efforts to Target Amazon

    Fenwick writes:

    "Personally directing a federal agency to raise prices on Amazon, therefore, looks like a blatant attempt to punish Bezoz and the
    Post for negative coverage. That would be a classic example of abuse of power.

    Even if Trump had good reasons for saying we should raise prices on Amazon, the mere appearance of the abuse of power could have a chilling effect on other people or organizations who may want to be critical of the president. In this way, Trump can accomplish his goal of stifling dissent without actually carrying out any retaliatory measures."

    https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...-target-amazon

    Trump's attempt to order the US Postal Service to increase Amazon's rates because of the Washington Post's negative coverage of his administration's immigration agenda, among other issues, is also paralleled in his directing his attorney general, Jeff Sessions to look into bringing "obstruction of justice" charges against a California mayor who resisted Trump's mass deportation program aimed mainly at Latin American and other immigrants of color, as described in my original comment below.

    Sessions, who, evidently, has some respect left for the rule of law, ignored Trump's demand.

    These two incidents of attempts to use the enormous power of the federal government to punish specific individuals for opposing or criticizing Donald Trump's immigration and other policies are just the latest additions to the steadily mounting evidence showing that his presidency and this nation's democracy are on a collision course.

    My original comment appears below.

    When I was growing up, a U.S. president, who, coincidentally, shared the same first four letters of his last name with America's current president, famously wrote a letter threatening to punch a Washington Post music critic in the nose (among other places) because the critic had panned the singing performance of the president's daughter, Margaret Truman.

    https://www.trumanlibrary.org/trivia/letter.htm

    But there is quite a big difference between a never carried out presidential threat to punch a newspaper music in the nose and an actual ongoing attempt by a president of the United States to use a major instrument of the government, in this case, the United States Post office, to destroy the multi-billion dollar business of a major newspaper publisher because of the latter's opposition to the president's policies, including among the most important targets of criticism, that president's immigration agenda.

    Yet this is exactly what Trump is attempting to do to Jeff Bezos, owner of both Amazon.com and the Washington Post, in retaliation for that newspaper's criticism of Trump's policies and performance as president, including, as a key element of that paper's opposition, Trump's assault on both legal and unauthorized immigration from mainly non-European, non-white parts of the world.

    And there is an even bigger difference between President Harry Truman's expression of outrage and a threat by Donald Trump to prosecute a local government official, in this case the mayor of Oakland, California, for resisting this president's mass deportation agenda.

    Trump's attempt to use the vast power of the federal government to destroy the business of the Washington Post's owner for criticizing Trump's administration, and his threat to prosecute Libby Schaaf, the mayor of Oakland, for refusing to fall in line with his ethnic cleansing deportation agenda directed against Latin American and other immigrants of color who are not from"countries like Norway" are not the actions of the leader of a democratic country that honors the rule of law. They are the actions of a dictator.

    It is not only Latin American, Muslim, African and other immigrants from outside white Europe who are the victims of Trump's attempt to impose his own racial prejudices and/or those of his right wing supporters on America through dismantling the programs and protections which have allowed millions of immigrants ranging from highly skilled H-1B workers to Diversity Visa lottery winners with only a high school education to come to the US legally in the past decades, and through spreading fear and terror in minority communities throughout America through his ethnic cleansing mass deportation agenda for non-criminal immigrants.

    The ultimate losers are the American people, whose almost 250 year-old experiment in democracy is now in danger of being wiped out.

    For the full story on Trump's attempts to bully the USPS into doubling the package delivery rates for Amazon in an obvious attempt at revenge against Bezos for the Washington Post's vocal opposition to Trump's anti-immigrant agenda and many other policies as president, see, Washington Post, May 18:

    Trump personally pushed postmaster general to double rates on Amazon, other firms

    (Available though Google - I do not have a direct link.)

    And for more details about Trump's threat to prosecute Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf for "obstruction of justice" (a charge that Trump himself has been under investigation for the past year by Special Counsel Robert Mueller in a non-immigration related context) for allegedly refusing to cooperate with an ICE raid as part of Trump's mass deportation agenda, see:

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...-cities-594470

    To be sure, the United States has not yet reached the point where critics of the president suddenly disappear in the middle of the night to be locked up on orders from the top or, allegedly, die by poisoning, as in the case of Russia (whose purported role in helping Trump win the presidency is still very much part of the Mueller investigation which is obviously causing Trump so much Angst).

    But the above news items leave no doubt that America is moving toward that direction in the "Donald Trump Era" - one which now includes a new CIA director who has had great difficulty overcoming allegations of complicity in torture.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...nate-democrats

    In view of Trump's open advocacy of using torture against people he perceives as dangerous during his presidential campaign

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...rture-tpp-rape

    could Trump's appointment of Gina Haspel to this powerful and influential position be another, not so veiled, warning to media figures and politicians who might be thinking of speaking out against Trump's plans to purge America of non-white immigrants, about what might happen to anyone who opposes this agenda in the non-so distant future?

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    algaselex@gmail.com

    Updated 05-20-2018 at 11:52 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

  5. The State of Immigration Enforcement by Alex Nowrasteh

    by , 05-18-2018 at 10:27 AM (Matthew Kolken on Deportation And Removal)
    Via the Cato Institute's Alex Nowrasteh:

    "Criminal removals are for those who are convicted of crimes, mostly nonviolent and nonproperty offenses such as violations of immigration law. Much of the fear today is that the Trump administration will increase the removals of noncriminal illegal immigrants. While they certainly are targeted, the number and percentage of noncriminal removals are barely changed in 2017 compared to 2016 (Figure 1). The number of criminal removals climbed by about 11,000 and noncriminal removals by about 3,000 in 2017 relative to 2016. "



    Click here for more analysis.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: