ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Recent Blogs Posts

  1. How Sessions' Faustian Anti-Immigrant Bargain With Donald Trump Could Lead to the End of American Democracy. Roger Algase

    There is an old joke about a politician who is told by one of his advisers that there is a way to guarantee that he, the politician, will never lose an election, no matter how long his career may last. Curious, the politician asks what he would have to do in order to achieve that enviable result.

    The adviser tells the politician that all he, the politician, has to do is agree to sell his soul to the Devil. The politician answers:

    "That sounds simple enough, but what's the catch?"

    While the above, of course, is only a joke, and no rational person would ever seriously accuse any of our elected officials of having sold his or her soul to, let alone actually being, the Devil, one can find at least a faint echo of this joke in the souring of the relationship between the Attorney General and former long term anti-immigrant Senator, and the president of the United States, Donald Trump.

    This is a relationship that was founded on one essential element that has been and still evidently is common to both men, namely opposition to immigration by non-European racial and religious minority groups. If their common pursuit of that policy goal seemed like a relationship that was "made in heaven" from the point of view of accomplishing that objective, it is now rapidly moving, at least for Sessions, in the direction of that other, opposite, place instead.

    This is because there was a "catch" in the implied bargain between Sessions and Trump.

    In return for Sessions' support as the first Senator actually to endorse him for president and someone who could be of immense help in rallying anti-immigrant voters to Trump's side, Trump held out the promise of bringing to actual fruition Sessions' long held goal of rolling back fifty years of progress in making the American dream available to immigrants from outside Europe, as contemplated by the immigration reform act of 1965.

    As immigration rights advocate Linda Chavez wrote about Sessions in September, 2016:

    "It's no coincidence that accompanying Trump on his visit south of the border was Sen. Jeff Sessions, arguably the most anti-immigrant politician since Senator William Paul Dillingham, whose opposition to immigrants from southern and eastern Europe resulted in the first mass restriction legislation in the early 1900's."

    http://www.newsmax.com/LindaChavez/t.../02/id/746424/

    But the "catch", which may or may not have been obvious to Sessions at the beginning, was that by entering into a bargain whereby Trump gave Sessions enormous power and control over America's immigration system as Attorney General of the United States, a power that Sessions might very arguably have only dreamed of ever having without Trump, Sessions would also be required to forego any ethical and legal scruples on his part which would have stood in the way of Trump's drive to absolute power.

    However, by recusing himself from the Russia investigation of possible illegal contacts between Trump, or his top campaign officials, between officials and or private individuals in that country, Sessions chose to honor the rule of law, rather than the absolute "loyalty" which Trump demanded of FBI James Comey before firing him as FBI Director and which Trump, evidently, demands of everyone whom he considers to be a subordinate; "loyalty" which would put Trump so far beyond the rule of law as to set the stage for the end of democracy in America and its replacement by one man rule. See: The Guardian, July 25:

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...mp-feud-russia

    and Salon (May 12):

    http://salon.com/2017/05/12/donald-t...get-it-report/

    As a result, Sessions, according to all the latest news reports (as of July 25), is now at risk of being forced out of or fired from his position, and thereby losing the power to turn America's immigration system, for perhaps decades to come, back in the direction of the 1924 "Nordics"- only immigration act which barred all but a very few of the world's Jews, Eastern and Southern European Catholics, Muslims, Asians, Africans and Middle Easterners from coming to the United States as immigrants, and which Sessions praised so highly in his January, 2015 Immigration "Handbook" for Congressional Republicans.

    http://www.aila.org/infonet/senator-...ation-handbook

    In my forthcoming further comments on this issue, i will examine in more detail how Sessions, in only six short months since becoming Attorney General of the United States, has impressed his legal stamp on the nation's immigration system.

    To begin with, however, here is a description from a source that supports Sessions' goals of the way he has already made major changes in immigration enforcement policy (to the obvious detriment of minority immigrant communities throughout the United States):

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/how-je...rticle/2620354

    As head of the DOJ, of course, Sessions has also been responsible for devising the deceptive, if not meretricious (from the Latin word meretrix) legal argument that Trump's Muslim ban orders were allegedly not aimed against Muslims as a religion, but were only national security measures - an argument which the overwhelming 4th Circuit majority blew apart in its IRAP decision, and which few other federal courts have taken seriously.

    Ironically, even though the heart of Sessions' DOJ's legal strategy in the Muslim ban cases rested on the same claim of absolute presidential power which Trump is now asserting in connection with the Russia investigation, and which threatens to end Sessions' own tenure as Attorney General (as well as America's two and a half centuries of history as a democracy), even this broad assertion of Trump's claimed authority to rule as a dictator, not a democratically elected leader, in the area of admission of immigrants to the US, has not been enough to satisfy Trump, who has been openly critical of the DOJ's strategy in defending his Muslim ban.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-br...-idUSKBN18W1BR

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    algaselex@gmail.com





    Updated 07-26-2017 at 05:45 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

  2. USCIS Launches Mobile Form for Replacing Green Card

    by , 07-25-2017 at 06:54 PM (Matthew Kolken on Deportation And Removal)
    July 25, 2017
    USCIS Launches Mobile Form for Replacing Green Card
    Redesigned Form I-90 offers mobile-friendly alternative to replace Green Card

    WASHINGTON ó Lawful permanent residents who file the online Form I-90, Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card, without assistance from an attorney or accredited representative, can now file their form and upload evidence entirely on a mobile device. The redesign of the online Form I-90 also allows lawful permanent residents to navigate the site more easily, making the process of renewing or replacing Green Cards more convenient.

    The new mobile-responsive design provides an intuitive method for answering questions, navigating through sections, and uploading evidence on a mobile device. Instructions for filing Form I-90 require providing certain evidence, such as a copy of government-issued identification. For those filing through a mobile device, it may be easier to take a photo of the evidence and upload it directly from their mobile devices. The redesigned online form also provides a more personalized experience, as users are directed to answer only those questions specific to their case.

    There are no substantive changes to the policy or content of the form, and the online version has parity with the questions and content on the paper form.

    Applicants can access the online Form I-90 through myUSCIS by creating a USCIS online account at https://myaccount.uscis.dhs.gov/. There is no cost to set up an account, which offers a variety of features including the ability to track the status of an application and to communicate with USCIS through a secure inbox.

    Customers who wish to file Form I-90 with the assistance of an attorney or accredited representative will continue to use the previous version of the online Form I-90.

    Additional information about Form I-90, including guidance on the application process, is available at uscis.gov/i-90.

    For more information about USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on Twitter (@uscis), YouTube (/uscis) and Instagram (@uscis).

    - USCIS -
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: