ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

California 'sanctuary state' bill is illegal, but also ineffective. By Nolan Rappaport

Rate this Entry

© Getty

Activist Dolores Huerta claims that California needs to enact the California Values Act, Senate Bill 54 (SB 54), as a counterweight to Texas’s draconian law banning sanctuary cities in that state and President Donald Trump’s “xenophobic agenda to deport millions of people.”

I disagree. While I can understand why Huerta dislikes Texas’s sanctuary city law, it is an exaggeration to call it “draconian.” And Trump is just enforcing immigration provisions that were written by Congress and signed into law by previous presidents. If those laws are xenophobic, the solution is to lobby Congress to change them.

Making California a sanctuary state will not stop Trump’s enforcement efforts. But it would violate federal law and make California ineligible for certain types of federal grants.

Legislative Counsel’s Digest of SB 54.

SB 54 would repeal existing law which requires the police to notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) when there is reason to believe that a person arrested for a violation of specified controlled substance provisions may be an alien.

It would, with some exceptions, prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from using their resources to investigate, detain, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes.

Read more at ---
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...neffective-way

Published originally on The Hill.

About the author.
Nolan Rappaport was detailed to the House Judiciary Committee as an executive branch immigration law expert for three years; he subsequently served as an immigration counsel for the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims for four years. Prior to working on the Judiciary Committee, he wrote decisions for the Board of Immigration Appeals for 20 years.





Submit "California 'sanctuary state' bill is illegal, but also ineffective.  By Nolan Rappaport" to Facebook Submit "California 'sanctuary state' bill is illegal, but also ineffective.  By Nolan Rappaport" to Twitter Submit "California 'sanctuary state' bill is illegal, but also ineffective.  By Nolan Rappaport" to Google Submit "California 'sanctuary state' bill is illegal, but also ineffective.  By Nolan Rappaport" to StumbleUpon Submit "California 'sanctuary state' bill is illegal, but also ineffective.  By Nolan Rappaport" to Reddit Submit "California 'sanctuary state' bill is illegal, but also ineffective.  By Nolan Rappaport" to Digg Submit "California 'sanctuary state' bill is illegal, but also ineffective.  By Nolan Rappaport" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: