ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

How Trump's legal immigration cuts could be a blessing to DREAMers. By Nolan Rappaport

Rate this Entry

© Getty

Senators Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.) recently introduced a revised version of the bill addressing legal immigration into the United States, the Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy (RAISE) Act. It is supposed to spur economic growth and raise working Americans' wages by giving priority to the best-skilled immigrants from around the world and reducing overall immigration by half.

Supporters include President Donald Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, andActing Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke.

Nevertheless, it will not reach the presidentís desk without support from influential Democratic congressmen, which will be difficult to get and wonít be free.

According to Representative Luis V. Gutierrez (D-Ill.), the RAISE Act ďand the bear hug by the Bannon/Kelly/Trump White House ó betrays the deep animosity towards legal immigration that has become the central, unifying tenet of the Republican Party.Ē

Gutierrez has his own problems getting legislation through Congress. He recently introduced the American Hope Act, H.R. 3591, which is the latest version of the DREAM Act, which would provide lawful status for undocumented aliens who were brought here as children.


Efforts have been made to get a DREAM Act through congress since 2001. No one has succeeded, and Gutierrez wonít either unless he can get republican support for his bill.


Can these political opponents work together?

See more at http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...-a-blessing-to

Published originally on The Hill.

Nolan Rappaport was detailed to the House Judiciary Committee as an executive branch immigration law expert for three years; he subsequently served as an immigration counsel for the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims for four years. Prior to working on the Judiciary Committee, he wrote decisions for the Board of Immigration Appeals for 20 years.




Submit "How Trump's legal immigration cuts could be a blessing to DREAMers. By Nolan Rappaport" to Facebook Submit "How Trump's legal immigration cuts could be a blessing to DREAMers. By Nolan Rappaport" to Twitter Submit "How Trump's legal immigration cuts could be a blessing to DREAMers. By Nolan Rappaport" to Google Submit "How Trump's legal immigration cuts could be a blessing to DREAMers. By Nolan Rappaport" to StumbleUpon Submit "How Trump's legal immigration cuts could be a blessing to DREAMers. By Nolan Rappaport" to Reddit Submit "How Trump's legal immigration cuts could be a blessing to DREAMers. By Nolan Rappaport" to Digg Submit "How Trump's legal immigration cuts could be a blessing to DREAMers. By Nolan Rappaport" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Update, September 2:

    For my comment on exactly what kind of "blessing" Trump may have in mind for Dreamers, by threatening to terminate DACA and destroy the hopes and futures of almost 800,000 young people whose only "crime" according to Trump's immigration agenda is coming from Latin America or other non-white parts of the world, see my September 1 Immigration Daily blog comment:

    Will Trump End DACA as Part of His White Supremacist Agenda, Or Will He Hold Dreamers Hostage to His Wall of Shame?

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law

    My earlier comments in response to Mr. Rappaport's above article appear below

    Update, August 17, 8:11 am:

    Nolan, out of respect for the death of the brave young woman who gave her life in opposing the white supremacist neo-nazi bigots at the August 12 Charlottesvile rally, don't you think that the Republicans should withdraw the RAISE Act, which the neo-nazi leader, Richard Spencer, has called "awesome" according to the Huffington Post, from consideration and make sure that it never sees the light of day again?

    Shouldn't you also consider withdrawing your own article above, which seems to give some legitimacy to this racially motivated bill as a "basis for negotiation"?

    How can anyone one negotiate with white supremacist hate, as Spencer correctly sees embodied in this bill?

    Just a helpful suggestion.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law

    My earlier comments to Nolan's article follow below:

    This is an update as of 2:25 pm on August 13 to my original comments below to note that the White House has now updated its original comment on the Charlottesville rally to condemn all "extremist groups", including white supremacists, the KKK and neo-Nazis.

    This clarification by the president is as welcome as it is overdue.

    Better late than never, Mr. President!

    My original responses to Nolan's above article appear below:

    Nolan makes a valid point in this article, namely about cuts in family immigration quotas being unacceptable because they would hurt constituents of Senators and Representatives on both sides of the aisle.

    With regard to eliminating the diversity visa program, this might seem to make some sense on the surface, but when one looks at its history, the idea of eliminating this program has at least two strikes against it.

    Strike 1: The Democrats already tried caving and throwing this program under the bus in the last ill-fated compromise attempt at comprehensive immigration form which passed the Senate but got nowhere in the House.

    The bill which passed the Senate would have eliminated the diversity visa program entirely.

    Strike 2:
    The origin of the diversity visa program was openly racial; its predecessor, the so-called AA-1 program was clearly intended to make visas available for the white countries of Europe only (plus a couple of East Asian countries, and a handful of others around the world with significant white populations). Ultimately AA-1 morphed into the DV-1 program, which has turned out to be a big boon to non-white areas of the world, especially Sub- Saharan Africa.

    Cancelling a program that was originally devised to help white immigrants because it has since turned into one that helps mainly black and brown immigrants would be widely perceived as racially motivated legislation, and with ample justification.

    And here we come to the main flaw in Nolan's ostensibly reasonable analysis, namely that it leaves out the racial motivations that have dominated America's immigration history ever since the time of the Chinese exclusion laws, and still continue to do so.

    Just in case anyone has any doubts on that score, he or she needs only read the latest headlines about the appalling hate rally conducted on August 12 in Charlottesville, Virginia by neo-Nazi groups (now euphemistically known as "white nationalists") holding storm trooper style torches and signs saying "blood and soil" (a direct English translation of the Nazi slogan: blut und boden), in which three lives so far have been lost. See my ilw.com comment:

    http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?10063

    As I point out in my comment, former KKK leader David Duke had the following to say in support of that rally (whose white nationalist organizers Trump has so far refused to single out for criticism, even though most other leading Republicans in America, many of whom support Trump, have lost no time in doing so - see the sources cited in my above ilw.com comment):

    To quote David Duke:

    "This represents a turning point for the people of this country. We are determined to take our country back...We are going to fulfill the promises of Donald Trump. That's what [we] believed in. That's why we voted fpr Donald Trump."

    http://www.businessinsider.com/david...e-rally-2017-8

    See also, Petuta Dvorak, writing in the Washington Post on August 13:

    Trump lit the torches of white supremacy in Charlottesville. We must extinguish them.

    (Sorry, I do not have a direct link. Please go to Google for access to this article.)

    Can there be any reasonable doubt that the RAISE Act, which is obviously intended to take America a long way backward toward the "Nordics"-only white supremacist immigration policies of the 1924 "national origins" immigration act which Adolf Hitler expressed such admiration for in Mein Kampf, is one of the "promises of Donald Trump" that David Duke was referring to in the above quote?

    At least that is one question which Democrats and other supporters of the DREAMers will no doubt be asking themselves before entering into any negotiations (as Nolan commendably recommends should take place, and clearly with the best of intentions) with supporters of the RAISE Act (which I have suggested elsewhere might more properly be called the RACE Act), and with good reason.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 09-02-2017 at 05:19 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  2. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by ImmigrationLawBlogs
    Nolan makes a valid point in this article, namely about cuts in family immigration quotas being unacceptable because they would hurt constituents of Senators and Representatives on both sides of the aisle.

    With regard to eliminating the diversity visa program, this might seem to make some sense on the surface, but when one looks at its history, the idea of eliminating this program has at least two strikes against it.

    Strike 1: The Democrats already tried caving and throwing this program under the bus in the last ill-fated compromise attempt at comprehensive immigration form which passed the Senate but got nowhere in the House.

    The bill which passed the Senate would have eliminated the diversity visa program entirely.

    Strike 2:
    The origin of the diversity visa program was openly racial; its predecessor, the so-called AA-1 program was clearly intended to make visas available for the white countries of Europe only (plus a couple of East Asian countries, and a handful of others around the world with significant white populations). Ultimately AA-1 morphed into the DV-1 program, which has turned out to be a big boon to non-white areas of the world, especially Sub- Saharan Africa.

    Cancelling a program that was originally devised to help white immigrants because it has since turned into one that helps mainly black and brown immigrants would be widely perceived as racially motivated legislation, and with ample justification.

    And here we come to the main flaw in Nolan's ostensibly reasonable analysis, namely that it leaves out the racial motivations that have dominated America's immigration history ever since the time of the Chinese exclusion laws, and still continue to do so.

    Just in case anyone has any doubts on that score, he or she needs only read the latest headlines about the appalling hate rally conducted on August 12 in Charlottesville, Virginia by neo-Nazi groups (now euphemistically known as "white nationalists") holding storm trooper style torches and signs saying "blood and soil" (a direct English translation of the Nazi slogan: blut und boden), in which three lives so far have been lost. See my ilw.com comment:

    http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?10063

    As I point out in my comment, former KKK leader David Duke had the following to say in support of that rally (whose white nationalist organizers Trump has so far refused to single out for criticism, even though most other leading Republicans in America, many of whom support Trump, have lost no time in doing so - see the sources cited in my above ilw.com comment):

    To quote David Duke:

    "This represents a turning point for the people of this country. We are determined to take our country back...We are going to fulfill the promises of Donald Trump. That's what [we] believed in. That's why we voted fpr Donald Trump."

    http://www.businessinsider.com/david...e-rally-2017-8

    See also, Petuta Dvorak, writing in the Washington Post on August 13:

    Trump lit the torches of white supremacy in Charlottesville. We must extinguish them.

    (Sorry, I do not have a direct link. Please go to Google for access to this article.)

    Can there be any reasonable doubt that the RAISE Act, which is obviously intended to take America a long way backward toward the "Nordics"-only white supremacist immigration policies of the 1924 "national origins" immigration act which Adolf Hitler expressed such admiration for in Mein Kampf, is one of the "promises of Donald Trump" that David Duke was referring to in the above quote?

    At least that is one question which Democrats and other supporters of the DREAMers will no doubt be asking themselves before entering into any negotiations (as Nolan commendably recommends should take place, and clearly with the best of intentions) with supporters of the RAISE Act (which I have suggested elsewhere might more properly be called the RACE Act), and with good reason.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Roger's comments remind me of a conversation I had with my daughter when she had just turned 16 and was learning to drive. When we approached an intersection, she failed to slow down in case the car approaching it from a different direction failed to yield the right away. When I pointed this out, her response was that she had the right away.

    I told her that being right wouldn't be any comfort to her mother if the other car ran through the intersection and killed both of us.

    I am not suggesting that I think Roger is right. He isn't. He is blinded by prejudice against people who have immigration views he dislikes. My point is that it doesn't matter whether he is right or wrong. His refusal to consider immigration reform from any perspective but his own kills any chance of reaching an agreement with the republicans. Literally makes it impossible.

    Keep preaching to the choir on how awful the republicans are, bearing down especially hard on Trump (the reincarnation of Hitler...or is it Satan?). It won't hurt you. It will just hurt the DREAMers and other undocumented aliens who might benefit from working with the republicans.

    Nolan Rappaport
  3. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    A respectful suggestion for Nolan to consider:

    Could we please keep this discussion on the level of legal analysis, which i have been careful to do in my above response to Nolan's article, and avoid personal attacks on the motives of commentators such as myself who may happen to disagree with Nolan's views about immigration -related laws or policy proposals?

    This discussion is about a suggestion for immigration reform legislation that Nolan makes in his article.

    It is not about Nolan's family.


    The ancient Greeks had a word for Nolan's attempt to blame the targets of Trump's RACE Act (sorry for the entirely intentional typo) and, very possibly by implication as well, the neo-Nazi rally rally which, according to one of its own leading supporters, David Duke, was inspired by Trump's promises as embodied in that bill and the rest of his immigration agenda, for the overt racism and bigotry that these Trump-supported proposals contain.

    It was known as "sophistry" in which any proposition, now matter how reasonable or true - could be turned around on its head to prove the opposite.

    At the same time, the Sophists could take any obviously false proposition and turn it around on its head to make it seem true.

    I hope I am not being unfair to the Sophists, and I apologize to them if I am.

    Nolan is not even correct when he states that I am opposed to his proposal for bipartisan negotiations on immigration reform, in which both the DREAmer's desire for more permanent legal status and the RAISE Act's proponent's wish to curtail certain types of legal immigration would be on the table.

    I have made clear that I entirely support Nolan's idea in principle and I commend him for his obviously well meant suggestion.

    I am only pointing out certain practical obstacles which would be likely to arise in the course of those negotiations - obstacles of which both the neo-Nazi hate rally in Charlottesville, and the president's pointed refusal to condemn the organizers of the rally specifically, rather than merely issuing a weak and ineffective condemnation of bigotry and racism "on many sides" - whatever that is supposed to mean - are highly disturbing symptoms of what is wrong with our society and our current administration that Nolan persists in trying or to ignore or to pretend do not exist.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 08-14-2017 at 07:13 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  4. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by ImmigrationLawBlogs
    The ancient Greeks had a word for Nolan's attempt to blame the targets of Trump's RACE Act (sorry for the entirely intentional typo) and, very possibly by implication as well, the neo-Nazi rally rally which, according to one of its own leading supporters, was inspired by Trump's promises as embodied in that bill and the rest of his immigration agenda, for the overt racism and bigotry that these Trump-supported proposals contain.

    It was known as "sophistry" in which any proposition, now matter how reasonable or true - could be turned around on its head to prove the opposite.

    At the same time, the Sophists could take any obviously false proposition and turn it around on its head to make it seem true.

    I hope I am not being unfair to the Sophists, and I apologize to them if I am.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law

    I am blaming the anger that Roger and his kindred spirits are causing with their constant, harsh criticisms and refusal to try to find a way to work with the Republicans, and with their insistence on political correctness.

    They aren't hurting the republicans; they are hurting the undocumented immigrants who are depending on the democrats to find a way to give them lawful status.

    Look through Roger's comments. Do you see anything that would facilitate compromise to reach an agreement with the republicans? Or just angry comments that shut the door to negotiations with the republicans?

    Nolan Rappaport
    Updated 08-13-2017 at 01:27 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  5. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Once again, I would respectfully encourage Nolan to confine his arguments to the legal and policy issues raised by his article's no doubt well meant proposal for immigration reform compromise and to avoid personal attacks, such as accusations of writing out of "anger" against commentators who may happen to disagree with some of his views about legal or policy matters.

    Again with all due respect, Nolan is distorting my comments once again. I have made very clear above that, at least in principle, I support his suggestion of bipartisan negotiations on immigration reform, in which both the legitimate concerns of DREAMers and those of the RAISE Act proponents would be on the table for discussion.

    I am merely pointing out that both the DREAMers issue and the RAISE Act itself are inextricably tied up with the racial politics which have been part of our history, not only since the infamous Chinese exclusion laws of the late 19th century, but going back even to Benjamin Franklin's attacks against German immigrants to the British colony of Pennsylvania based on their alleged skin color before America even became independent.

    No immigration scholar of Nolan's distinguished reputation can possibly deny the existence of this history; and just in case anyone has forgotten about it, the neo-Nazis who organized the appalling August 12 violent rally of white supremacist hate which almost every Republican leader in America (except Donald Trump) has already condemned for its overt white supremacist racism have just given us a very disturbing reminder that this history is also part of America's present, not just its past.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 08-14-2017 at 07:49 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  6. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    And just in case any readers still misunderstand my position, I am not advocating something patently absurd, such as a Democratic negotiator sitting down with Republican ones and saying: "OK, lets now talk about your racist RAISE Act"!

    What I am saying is that if we had more responsible presidential leadership, such as a little less unequivocal support for the RAISE Act, which even Nolan rightly objects to for its proposal to slash family immigration (most of which happens to be from non-white parts of the world), and a little more unequivocal condemnation of the appallingly racist and white supremacist neo-Nazis who instigated the August 12 violent hate rally in Virginia, there would be a better chance of successful bipartisan immigration reform negotiations, not ones that would be doomed to failure in advance.

    As I have pointed out in the news report links provided in my own ilw.com comment on this rally, almost every other Republican leader in America has explicitly condemned the "white nationalist" (a/k/a neo-Nazi) organizers of this rally.

    What is holding the president of the United States back from doing the same?

    As a late note to the above, the latest news reports say that the president has now clarified his remarks to condemn white supremacists, the KKK and the neo-Nazis.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...-groups-241590

    Congratulations, Mr. President! Better late than never!

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 08-13-2017 at 02:31 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  7. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by ImmigrationLawBlogs
    With all due respect, Nolan is distorting my comments once again. I have made very clear above that, at least in principle, I support his suggestion of bipartisan negotiations on immigration reform, in which both the legitimate concerns of DREAMers and those of the RAISE Act proponents would be on the table for discussion.

    I am merely pointing out that both the DREAMers issue and the RAISE Act itself are inextricably tied up with the racial politics which have been part of our history, not only since the infamous Chinese exclusion laws of the late 19th century, but going back even to Benjamin Franklin's attacks against German immigrants to the British colony of Pennsylvania based on their alleged skin color before America even became independent.

    No immigration scholar of Nolan's distinguished reputation can possibly deny the existence of this history; and just in case anyone has forgotten about it, the neo-Nazis who organized the appalling August 12 violent rally of white supremacist hate which almost every Republican leader in America (except Donald Trump) has already condemned for its overt white supremacist racism have just given us a very disturbing reminder that this history is also part of America's present, not just its past.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Again, it doesn't matter whether Roger's negative opinion of the republicans is right or wrong. You have to deal with them if you want immigration reform of any kind, and saying terrible things about them is not the way to facilitate negotiations.

    Nolan Rappaport
  8. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    September 2, update:

    What does Nolan have to say about the storm of criticism coming from from REPULICAN leaders such as House Speaker Paul Ryan and many others against Trump's Threat to Terminate DACA?

    Is this the "blessing" that Trump is planning to give almost 800,000 deserving young people who pose no threat to the United States whatsoever, and many of whom are now studying in American universities so they can contribute to our society in the future (and at least one or two of whom are now admitted to the bar as lawyers)?

    The president has now, finally, clearly condemned the white supremacists, KKK, neo-Nazis and other "extremist groups" that were responsible for this rally and the loss of three lives that resulted.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...-groups-241590

    Now, all we need is a little backtracking on Trump's unequivocal support for the RAISE Act, whose restrictions on family immigration Nolan himself has pointed out are objectionable; and then there might be a better chance of such negotiations actually producing a result, instead of merely being an empty gesture and one more excuse for Nolan to blame the Democrats for a failure whose real cause goes back to racist attitudes toward immigrants that have been of America's history from the very beginning.

    Nolan, isn't it time to admit and confront this sorry history of racism, which responsible leaders in both parties have condemned, and the effect that this history is still having on immigration policies and proposals today, rather than blaming other people for calling attention to this elephant in the presumptive immigration reform negotiating room?

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 09-02-2017 at 05:41 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  9. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by ImmigrationLawBlogs
    I am sure that Nolan will want to join me in congratulating and commending the president for finally showing real leadership in his, admittedly belated, clarification of his previous statement about the Charlottesville rally.

    The president has now clearly condemned the white supremacists, KKK, neo-Nazis and other "extremist groups" that were responsible for this rally and the loss of three lives that resulted.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...-groups-241590

    Now, all we need is a little backtracking on Trump's unequivocal support for the RAISE Act, whose restrictions on family immigration Nolan himself has pointed out are objectionable; and then there might be a better chance of such negotiations actually producing a result, instead of merely being an empty gesture and one more excuse for Nolan to blame the Democrats for a failure whose real cause goes back to racist attitudes toward immigrants that have been of America's history from the very beginning.

    Nolan, isn't it time to admit and confront this sorry history of racism, which responsible leaders in both parties have condemned, and the effect that this history is still having on immigration policies and proposals today, rather than blaming other people for calling attention to this elephant in the presumptive immigration reform negotiating room?

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law

    Really, Roger? Don't you remember how much trouble Trump had when he used a term that identified terrorists, i.e., "Islamic Extremists." Now you are criticizing him for not being specific enough.

    But again, I wish you would make these comments in your own blogs instead of on mine. I don't care whether he is specific enough in identifying extremists or too specific. And that issue has nothing to do with my article. I made the mistake of replying anyway this time. It led nowhere. It never does.

    I wouldn't mind so much if your tangents related to immigration issues, even if they were on wildly divergent tangents. But why Trump criticisms?

    Nolan Rappaport
    Updated 08-13-2017 at 10:03 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  10. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Is criticism of Donald Trump's White Supremacist anti-immigrant agenda prohibited by the rules of discussion in a free country such as the United States of America?

    Everything I have been saying about the president and/or his GOP supporters in response to Nolan's above article is related to issues of immigration law or policy.

    We are not talking about health care, North Korea or dozens of other issues that are not directly related to immigration and are obviously outside the scope of this discussion. Every one of my comments is in direct response to Nolan's well meant suggestion, which I have made clear that I support in principle - I am on Nolan's side here - for discussion about an immigration reform compromise.

    This is a worthy goal, Nolan. I have said so repeatedly. What is so irritating about that?

    However, having made clear that I am on Nolan's side in principle on this issue, I would also respectfully suggest that Nolan might want to accept and get used to the idea that there are some people who may, from time to time, disagree with some of his views on matters related to immigration law and policy and who may wish to express their own opinions in response to his articles.

    Isn't that what ilw.com is all about? Isn't that what free discussion, including discussion among fellow attorneys, means?

    If Nolan's various opinions are as valid as he obviously believes they are, why should he be so wary of opposing or dissenting views?

    I hope and trust that his attempts to discourage or stifle expression of views on immigration issues that are different from his own opinions are not a sign of any lack of confidence by Nolan in the validity of his own arguments.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 09-02-2017 at 05:32 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  11. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    And where does Nolan get the evident, distorted, impression that I am the only person in America who objected to Trump's original (yes, I will call it cowardly) failure to stand up against the white supremacists and neo-nazis who caused the deadly riot in Virginia, and one of whose most prominent spokesmen claimed was inspired by the president's own views on race (including, of course, immigration)?

    Why is Nolan not paying any attention to the same Republican leaders whose immigration objectives Nolan gives so much weight to, but whom he is now ignoring when they criticize the president for many of the same reasons that I have been doing above?

    See, POLITICO, August 13,

    Republicans stand up to Trump over Charlottesville comments.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...omments-241593

    See also E.J. Dionne, writing in the Washington Post on August 13:

    After Charlottesville: End the denial about Trump

    Nolan, isn't it about time for you to end your own personal denial of the racism and bigotry toward immigrants, and black or brown people in general, that began with Trump's kickoff to his presidential campaign just over two years ago (I am not even going into his previous despicable "birther" attacks on President Obama - that is clearly going too far afield from the current topic under discussion), and have been continuing right up to the moment of the president's initial weak and equivocal response to the latest neo-nazi rally in Virginia?

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 08-13-2017 at 09:04 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  12. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    And, after Trump's inexcusable failure to speak out against the neo-nazi demonstrators using a Hitler-era anti-Semitic slogan in Charlottesville, American Prospect writer Gabrielle Gurley offers a preview of what we might be able to expect from Trump's speech in Phoenix tomorrow, August 22, at which there is speculation that he may engage in the atrocity of pardoning America's apostle of anti-immigrant hate and bigotry, former Sheriff Joe Arpaio:

    See:

    Look Out: Trump Sets His Sights on Phoenix:

    Nothing good can come from a presidential visit by a man determined to lead the country to the dark side after Charlottesville

    http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-pol...sights-phoenix

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law

    Updated 08-21-2017 at 11:59 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  13. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    For my latest comment on exactly what kind of "blessing" Trump may have in mind for Dreamers (as mentioned in the title of Mr. Rappaport's above article), see my September 1 blog comment in Immigration Daily:

    Will Trump End DACA as Part of His White Supremacist Agenda, Or Will He Hold Dreamers Hostage to His Wall of Shame?


    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: