ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Angelo Paparelli on Dysfunctional Government

Immigration Frugality and Fiscal Responsibility

Rate this Entry

When the snowpocalypse ends in Washington, and political hot air thaws the frozen streets, expect to see mules and elephants parade in bipartisan togetherness -- at least in one area.  The party of Lincoln and the party of tea could well agree with the following words of President Obama on the urgency of fiscal responsibility (even as they disagree on whether the trimming of deficits has begun in earnest):



[A]t a time when we face not only a fiscal crisis, but also a host of difficult challenges as a nation, business as usual in Washington just won't do. . . . After years of irresponsibility, we are once again taking responsibility for every dollar we spend, the same way families do.


Why then are partisans on both sides of the aisle not roundly applauding the recent dollar-pinching actions of a U.S. District Court judge in Texas?  Last week in U.S. v. Ordones-Soto, et al., the judge ordered the United States Attorney and the Assistant United States Attorney when prosecuting cases pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 to be prepared "in all future sentencings to state the substantive reason(s) for the prosecution of each individual case." 8 U.S.C. § 1326 punishes the illegal entry to the U.S. of a person previously deported.


Citing three illegal-reentry cases before the court, the judge noted that county jail payments for six months of incarcerating the convicted defendants ("with no significant criminal history") cost taxpayers over $13,500. This sum pales in comparison to the costs in time and money of court personnel salaries and operating expenses, and those of the U.S. Attorneys Office, the U.S. Marshal's Service, the U.S. Probation Office, payments to appointed defense counsel and Federal Public Defenders, interpreters, medical and dental care providers, and drivers transporting defendants to and from the jail.


With "every judge in the Western District of Texas . . . sentencing a substantial number of illegal [entrants and reentrants] every month," the judge berated the government for its spendthrift ways:



The expenses of prosecuting illegal entry and reentry cases (rather than deportation) on aliens without any significant criminal record is simply mind boggling.  The U.S. Attorney's policy of prosecuting all aliens presents a cost to the American taxpayer at this time that is neither meritorious nor reasonable.


The cost to taxpayers of the removal machinery (and I'm not talking snow here but people) will only grow if, as described in a reportthis month by the American Bar Association (ABA) Commission on Immigration and Arnold & Porter, the Executive Office for Immigration Review is to be given the authority, resources and judges sufficient to match the number of cases in immigration court with the expensive demands of due process as the ABA House of Delegates proposes.


My point is not that we emulate Scrooge McDuck to hoard the few remaining dollars in the public coffers, thereby giving up on enforcement of the immigration laws.  Rather, we need due process in removal proceedings and in federal court, but also a wise and fiscally sound exercise of prosecutorial and presidentialdiscretion.  It's time to stanch the unending flow of "aliens without any significant criminal record" into over-crowded county jails, immigration detention facilities and immigration courts.  Federal Courts should be the place where U.S. Attorneys bring to justice very bad people: Ponzi-scheme perpetrators; Medicare and mortgage fraudsters; drug traffickers; cybercriminals, RICO conspirators, insider traders and givers and takers of bribes. 


In other words, it's way past time for the Obama Administration and Congress to push really hard on bipartisan and comprehensive immigration reform or or for the President to exercise his discretionary power proactively to address this immigration fiscal fiasco, while striking a blow against terrorism, with user-fee-financed grants of deferred action and employment authorization.

Submit "Immigration Frugality and Fiscal Responsibility" to Facebook Submit "Immigration Frugality and Fiscal Responsibility" to Twitter Submit "Immigration Frugality and Fiscal Responsibility" to Google Submit "Immigration Frugality and Fiscal Responsibility" to StumbleUpon Submit "Immigration Frugality and Fiscal Responsibility" to Reddit Submit "Immigration Frugality and Fiscal Responsibility" to Digg Submit "Immigration Frugality and Fiscal Responsibility" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Dissertation Writing's Avatar
    it's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, thanx now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: