ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
© 1995-
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Angelo Paparelli on Dysfunctional Government

When Will They Ever Learn? -- Immigration Denial Thrives Perniciously at USCIS

Rate this Entry

Since the early days of this blog, I've chastised immigration bureaucrats who use specious reasoning to treat small businesses petitioning for employment-related immigration benefits more harshly than their large-cap counterparts. 

The latest assault on fairness and reason is reflected in a trend affecting several categories of employment-based visas -- the H-1B (Worker in a Specialty Occupation), the L-1 nonimmigrant (Intracompany-Transferee Manager or Executive) and the EB1-3 (Multinational Manager or Executive).  An example of this trend is a recently released EB1-3 decision (decided May 1, 2009) of the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) denying an immigrant visa petition for a multinational manager from abroad who owned a controlling stake in the company petitioning for the visa.  The basis for the visa denial was the asserted lack of an employer-employee relationship and the supposition that the terms, "employer," "employee," and "employed" are undefined. 

The AAO apparently has forgotten that it is an agency bound by precedent decisions issued by the Attorney General:

[D]ecisions of the Attorney General . . . shall be binding on all officers and employees of the Department of Homeland Security.

[8 CFR § 103.37(g)].

Ever since 1958, the Attorney General in the precedent case of Matter of M (p. 49 et seq.) has held that a corporation may legitimately petition for its owner to receive an immigrant visa. See also, Matter of Aphrodite Investments Limited.   Likewise, a Federal District Court, interpreting the L-1 visa category, ruled that a sole proprietorship can form the basis for its foreign owner to qualify under the L-1 category. See Johnson-Laird, Inc., v. INS, 537 F. Supp. 52 (D. Ore 1981).  Indeed, USCIS's own regulations recognize that if the sponsored employee, in immigration parlance, "the beneficiary," is a major stockholder of the petitioning company, an L-1 visa is permitted:

If the beneficiary is an owner or major stockholder of the company, the petition must be accompanied by evidence that the beneficiary's services are to be used for a temporary period and evidence that the beneficiary will be transferred to an assignment abroad upon the completion of the temporary services in the United States.

[8 CFR § 214.2(l)(3)(vii)].

While this evidentiary provision is essentially a dead letter because the Immigration Act of 1990 eliminated the requirement of proof of the intention to return abroad, its continuing presence in the Code of Federal Regulations stands as a testament to the agency's longstanding recognition that an owner of a company may qualify as an employee of the petitioning entity. 

This is not the first time I've railed against the lawless behavior of USCIS officials.  The sad truth is that the targets of their lawlessness -- small businesses -- are the very "first responders" who lead the economy out every recessionary swoon.  President Obama at the Brookings Institution this week in his "Remarks on Job Creation and Economic Growth" placed the issue in stark relief:

Over the past 15 years, small businesses have created roughly 65 percent of all new jobs in America. These are companies formed around kitchen tables in family meetings, formed when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, formed when a worker decides it's time she became her own boss. These are also companies that drive innovation, producing 13 times more patents per employee than large companies. And it's worth remembering, every once in a while a small business becomes a big business -- and changes the world.

At this labor-management summit, the President solicited the best ideas available to create new jobs in America.  Well, Mr. President, I have one:  Send the Attorney General to the USCIS AAO and the Regional Service Centers and have him stop their sophistic slaughter of small businesses.

Submit "When Will They Ever Learn? -- Immigration Denial Thrives Perniciously at USCIS" to Facebook Submit "When Will They Ever Learn? -- Immigration Denial Thrives Perniciously at USCIS" to Twitter Submit "When Will They Ever Learn? -- Immigration Denial Thrives Perniciously at USCIS" to Google Submit "When Will They Ever Learn? -- Immigration Denial Thrives Perniciously at USCIS" to StumbleUpon Submit "When Will They Ever Learn? -- Immigration Denial Thrives Perniciously at USCIS" to Reddit Submit "When Will They Ever Learn? -- Immigration Denial Thrives Perniciously at USCIS" to Digg Submit "When Will They Ever Learn? -- Immigration Denial Thrives Perniciously at USCIS" to

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags


  1. Peter Parker's Avatar
    I read the denial notice and it clearly states that with a business income of $5500 U.S. dollars, she cannot afford to pay herself 50,000 U.S. dollars.

    She has a little jewelry store barely surviving. She is obviously trying to game the system. How can anyone defend this?
  2. Stefany's Avatar
    i was diagnosed last year, poitvsae for both types of herpes and i'm still living with the guy who gave them to me and hoping to get married to him one day.there is a definate possiblility that u got HSV1 from your hsuband. oral herpes is contagious and can be passed on even when there are no symptoms, same with HSV2. if u had past partners u could have gotten herpes from them as well but since your husband is the most recent relation ship then u could have gotten that from him.some times herpes takes a while to develope symptoms which on a blood test can cause some false poitvsaes or negatives. u should get tested in about 4-6 months time just to be sure. but if it turns out poitvsae again then u would know for sure that u have herpes. just because u have herpes does not mean that u will have hiv too, but its good to get a test done anyways.u have to talk to your husband about this and tell him what happened with your tests. then get your husband tested. if he loves u for who u are then having stds shouldn't matter. its knowing what to do to protect yourself anour partner that matters. do some research on herpes and have that ready for him when u want to tell him.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: