ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Angelo Paparelli on Dysfunctional Government

Bad, Bad, Bad (Immigration) Vibrations from USCIS

Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.

Just when U.S. employers thought the bad vibes emanating from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) could get no worse, the agency tasked with deciding whether to approve or reject requests for immigration benefits has come up with VIBE -- its new Verification Initiative for Business Enterprises which costs a whopping $35,506,760.43. 


Just imagine . . .



. . .  a program in which USCIS, by using VIBE, "will acquire information from an [Independent Information Provider (IIP)] . . ., which can be used to verify the eligibility of a company while detecting multiple types of misrepresentations."


. . .  a program that will run checks on the "financial viability" of the existing population of 137,000 companies that have registered with E-Verify, Homeland Security's online employment-verification database, as well as the roughly 52,000 new E-Verify registrants each year.


. . . a program where a "Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) [mandated by the E-Government Act of 2002] and a System of Records Notice (SORN) [mandated by the Privacy Act] will not be required." 


. . . a program where USCIS flouts the spirit if not the letter of its own regulation, 8 CFR § 103.2(b)(16)(i), which requires its officers to advise a petitioner or applicant of derogatory evidence and provide an opportunity to rebut the information.


. . . a world where information collected on companies' financial viability and business operations may be inaccurate, incomplete or outdated, and yet is relied upon by USCIS to issue requests for additional evidence (RFEs) that are even more burdensome than the type we see today and that unfairly delay the grant of work permits, visa petitions and green cards to deserving companies and their employees.


. . . a world in which a cash-strapped immigration agency, whose "financial viability" is endangered because its business model relies on the uncertain ebb and flow of user fees rather than government appropriations, would probably fail IIP testing if subjected to the same sort of third-party scrutiny as it plans to inflict on the very payors of its user fees. 


Well, there's no need to imagine such a program because, according to a recent letterfrom USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas to Senator Chuck Grassley, VIBE will likely be implemented in the "spring of 2010."  Director Mayorkas promises to provide Senator Grassley with "regular updates as to the progress of the [VIBE] program's rollout." 


Perhaps the good Director can also provide the public, through the USCIS Office of Public Engagement, and the Senate and House Immigration Subcommittees, with an explanation of why VIBE requires no Privacy Impact Assessment or Privacy Act SORN notice, or why the financial viability of E-Verify registrants must be tested, or what safeguards have been incorporated or reparations set aside for payment if an IIP provides inaccurate data or an immigration examiner misinterprets data and a petitioning company -- perhaps a startup of which the IIP is unaware -- thereby loses a major contract, or if an unjustified delay in adjudication or denial of benefits results in the loss of a key foreign worker. 


Clearly, stakeholders, take note and be wary, for the Immigration Singularity is upon us.

Submit "Bad, Bad, Bad (Immigration) Vibrations from USCIS" to Facebook Submit "Bad, Bad, Bad (Immigration) Vibrations from USCIS" to Twitter Submit "Bad, Bad, Bad (Immigration) Vibrations from USCIS" to Google Submit "Bad, Bad, Bad (Immigration) Vibrations from USCIS" to StumbleUpon Submit "Bad, Bad, Bad (Immigration) Vibrations from USCIS" to Reddit Submit "Bad, Bad, Bad (Immigration) Vibrations from USCIS" to Digg Submit "Bad, Bad, Bad (Immigration) Vibrations from USCIS" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Tsultrim's Avatar
    I THINK IS IMPORTANT TO BE CAREFUL AND I GONNA TRY TO MAKE MY POINT WITH MY SPANGLISH : I have been reading many aericlts and tv programmes about this couple and everytime it is mentioned that the Australian one remained legal. Whether a foreign partner had the chance to remain legal or not (the possibilities to remain legal in the US depends on many factors such as nationality, if u have money for investments, profession, etc) SHOULDNT BE MENTIONED AS A POSITIVE QUALITY that gives that particular couple points towards being aknowledged!!Giving that much importance to the legal status of people (that might had remained ilegal just to be with her-his spouse or partner) is wrong because in the future it might be used against couples as an excuse to continue to discriminate. PLease stop doing that!!!
  2. Afit's Avatar
    After 19 years in a relationship, Anthony has never viatelod our country's immigration laws. Why to add this? What does this has to do with the fact that the US does not allow same sex American citizens to bring home their spouses or fiances? Why to respect US immigration laws under the current circumstances has become in every article and in every interview such a dignifying act when most of the time remain legal when you are a foreigner is impossible to accomplish and being ilegal to keep your family together is all what is left to do???
  3. Malu's Avatar
    hi,I am in different stiaution. I am on l2 visa which got expired on 15 sept 2011 but still I have valid i94 till jan 2014. I applied for my EAD renewal but got denied because uscis system shows my l2 visa hasn't got extended. My question is : am I eligible to file i539 form for extension when I still have valid i94 till jan 2014?your help would be highly appreciated!!!
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: