ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Angelo Paparelli on Dysfunctional Government

Bailout Amnesty -> GOOD! - Immigration Reform -> BAAAD!

Rate this Entry

Economists talk about the moral hazard - the notion that people should not be free to violate principles of good faith and fair play, but instead should be held accountable for their mistakes and transgressions.  As Wikepedia tells us (at least as of 9/25/08):

Moral hazard is the prospect that a party insulated from risk may behave differently from the way [he, she or] it would behave if . . . fully exposed to the risk. Moral hazard arises because an individual or institution does not bear the full consequences of [his, her or] its actions, and therefore has a tendency to act less carefully than [he, she or] it otherwise would, leaving another party to bear some responsibility for the consequences of those actions.

In other words, moral hazard connotes irresponsible, perhaps lawless, risk-taking behavior that ultimately mistreats or unfairly disadvantages others.  Economists, ethicists and many members of the public have decried the wholesale disregard of moral hazard in the bipartisan effort within Congress and the Bush Administration to bail out Wall Street.  As a pragmatic matter, to promote the general welfare and avoid the seizing up of our economy for lack of liquidity, politicians are rising "above politics" and doing what they think is the right thing to save the economy and the American people.



Pragmatism and doing the right thing, despite moral hazard, is much less popular, however, when it comes to immigration - a word uttered only twice during the logorrheic speeches at the Democratic and Republican party conventions. Bailout amnesty for promoters and borrowers of "liar's loans" is fine, I suppose, if it promotes the general welfare.  On the other hand, according to our morally nimble politicians, legal status for crossing the border to work and feed one's family, performing jobs that we need done but disdain for ourselves, would "reward law violators," and that would be wrong.



The French, I guess, are better at the practice of countenancing ethical hairsplitting. As François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld, sagely observed:   "Hypocrisy is an homage that vice renders to virtue."

Submit "Bailout Amnesty -> GOOD! - Immigration Reform -> BAAAD!" to Facebook Submit "Bailout Amnesty -> GOOD! - Immigration Reform -> BAAAD!" to Twitter Submit "Bailout Amnesty -> GOOD! - Immigration Reform -> BAAAD!" to Google Submit "Bailout Amnesty -> GOOD! - Immigration Reform -> BAAAD!" to StumbleUpon Submit "Bailout Amnesty -> GOOD! - Immigration Reform -> BAAAD!" to Reddit Submit "Bailout Amnesty -> GOOD! - Immigration Reform -> BAAAD!" to Digg Submit "Bailout Amnesty -> GOOD! - Immigration Reform -> BAAAD!" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: