ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Angelo Paparelli on Dysfunctional Government

The Door of Consular Absolutism is Ajar

Rate this Entry

On July 9, Alma and Jose Bustamante forced open the door of consular absolutism just an inch or so, but this wasn't enough room for the couple to go through that unjust portal.  Consular absolutism (also known as consular nonreviewability) is the longstanding judicial doctrine that the courts will not consider visa refusals based on a factual decision of an American consular officer. 



The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bustamante v. Mukasey determined that "when a citizen's constitutional rights are alleged to have been violated by the denial of a visa to a foreigner, we undertake a highly constrained review solely to determine whether the consular official acted on the basis of a facially legitimate and bona fide reason." The Ninth Circuit rested this slim right of review on the citizen's liberty interest in marriage:

[We hold that] a U.S citizen raising a constitutional challenge to the denial of a visa is entitled to a limited judicial inquiry regarding the reason for the decision. As long as the reason given is facially legitimate and bona fide the decision will not be disturbed. . . . Here, [the American citizen spouse] asserts that she has a protected liberty interest in her marriage that gives rise to a right to constitutionally adequate procedures in the adjudication of her husband's visa application. The Supreme Court has deemed "straightforward" the notion that "[t]he Due Process Clause provides that certain substantive rights -- life, liberty, and property -- cannot be deprived except pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures." Freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is, of course, one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause. See Cleveland Bd of Educ. v. LaFleur, 414 632, 639-640 (1974).

The Bustamantes lost because the ground of visa ineligibility involved a very low threshold.  All that was necessary was for the consular officer to have a "reason to believe" that Jose was a drug trafficker.



In many other situations, however, the "reason to believe" standard does not apply.  In other grounds of inadmissibility under INA Sec. 212(a), there must be real facts on which to base a visa refusal.  Although the crack in the door of consular absolutism is narrow, passionate immigration lawyers should bring cases where a federal district court might well find that the consular official acted on a facially illegitimate basis or in bad faith.  I suspect that some cases of this type are out there.  Build the argument and the clients will come.



Congratulations to the Bustamantes' lawyers, Mark Van Der Hout and Beth Feinberg, for opening the door.



Submit "The Door of Consular Absolutism is Ajar" to Facebook Submit "The Door of Consular Absolutism is Ajar" to Twitter Submit "The Door of Consular Absolutism is Ajar" to Google Submit "The Door of Consular Absolutism is Ajar" to StumbleUpon Submit "The Door of Consular Absolutism is Ajar" to Reddit Submit "The Door of Consular Absolutism is Ajar" to Digg Submit "The Door of Consular Absolutism is Ajar" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Coach Outlet's Avatar
    Believe in yourself you can!
  2. ClubPenguinCheats's Avatar
    The Ninth Circuit rested this slim right of review on the citizen's liberty interest in marriage.
  3. how to burn xbox 360 games's Avatar
    Perhaps we need more updates about this. This post is two years ago and I am looking forward to see more fresher updates. Keep up the good work.
  4. bad boys 3 trailer's Avatar
    The Bustamantes lost because the ground of visa ineligibility involved a very low threshold. All that was necessary was for the consular officer to have a "reason to believe" that Jose was a drug trafficker.
  5. authentic air jordan shoes's Avatar
    Perhaps we need more updates about this. This post is two years ago and I am looking forward to see more fresher updates. Keep up the good work.
  6. Camarad's Avatar
    This theme has interested me! This post is two years ago and I am looking forward to see more fresher updates.
  7. Jason Segel's Avatar
    What remarkable post! The Bustamantes lost because the ground of visa ineligibility involved a very low threshold. All that was necessary was for the consular officer to have a "reason to believe" that Jose was a drug trafficker.
  8. Moncler Weste's Avatar
    well this blog is great i love reading your articles.
  9. Rose Macleod's Avatar
    The door of the consular is always great and very good for all the people. The essay writing services reviews should have good and nice essays for all the people so they can learn great things.
  10. thomasq's Avatar
    twitter followers These things are very important, good think so - I think so too... buy twitter retweets
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: