ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



Immigration Daily

Chinese Immig. Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Carl Shusterman's Immigration Update

Hollywood vs. USCIS

Rate this Entry In 2008, all four Oscar winners in the acting categories went to foreign-born persons: Daniel Day-Lewis (Best Actor), Marion Cotillard (Best Actress), Javier Bardem (Best Supporting Actor) and Tilda Swinton (Best Supporting Actress).

Of course, these actors were all selected by their colleagues, and what do they know about acting? Imagine if the Oscar winners were voted upon by recognized experts in the field, i.e., the immigration examiners at the California Service Center (CSC). Fat chance that the Oscar winners would be a bunch of foreigners!

As an article in today's Los Angeles Times reveals, Hollywood is in an uproar against the USCIS and its restrictive policies. Many performances at prominent venues have had to be cancelled because CSC examiners have denied visas to performing groups.

Denial rates for O-1 petitions for persons of extraordinary ability have doubled between 2008 and today. Denial rates for P petitions for performers and athletes skyrocketed from 11% in 2008 to over 26% this year. And in an industry where delays may be tantamount to denials, the percentage of Requests for Evidence (RFEs) have more than doubled during the same period.

Another problem is long processing times. A spokesperson for the Los Angeles Philharmonic complains that they are forced to pay premium processing fees to the USCIS which is imposing unnecessary financial burdens on the orchestra.

Are USCIS examiners sufficiently-trained to separate the wheat from the chaff when adjudicating O and P petitions? One wonders.

I vividly remember fighting with the USCIS a few years ago over whether a pitcher for the Arizona Diamondbacks should be classified as a person of extraordinary ability. He was making over $4 million a year, and had been in the majors for over 10 years. Yet, this did not stop the examiner from sending out RFEs asking how his salary compared with that of the two highest paid pitchers in the major leagues. Is that really the test? I had to restrain myself from asking how $4 million per year compared with the examiner's salary.

Eventually, the examiner denied the petition. The next day, we filed an appeal. A few days later, the USCIS reversed its decision and granted the petition. Maybe a supervisor took a closer look at the petition.

USCIS Commissioner Alejandro Mayorkas is investigating the higher O and P denial and RFE rates, and the long processing times. He states that "the community deserves consistency. These are our customers, and we are committed to improving customer service."

I agree. Tis well it were done quickly.

Subscribe to our free, monthly e-mail newsletter, and follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+ and YouTube.

Submit "Hollywood vs. USCIS" to Facebook Submit "Hollywood vs. USCIS" to Twitter Submit "Hollywood vs. USCIS" to Google Submit "Hollywood vs. USCIS" to StumbleUpon Submit "Hollywood vs. USCIS" to Reddit Submit "Hollywood vs. USCIS" to Digg Submit "Hollywood vs. USCIS" to

Updated 12-02-2013 at 04:29 PM by CShusterman


  1. Leslie Davis's Avatar
    Said very well, Carl - as always. You're terrific when you get outraged which all of us are. Thank you for speaking for everyone on this issue. We have already noticed a change. We just received a premium processed case approval on an O-1 scientist. This was the first time - in a very long time - that this happened.

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: