ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy

TAKING ON THE CRAZIES

Rate this Entry

The Arizona Republic reports on efforts to counter the anti-immigrant steady drumbeat heard on conservative talk radio stations (see my post on Michael Savage from earlier this week). Some are advocating bringing back the "fairness doctrine" requiring stations operating on the public's airwaves to present opposing viewpoints when it presents political commentary.  And some groups are organizing boycotts against advertisers who support hate radio.  In any case, it's important that the narrative being heard on talk radio be challenged and that the public hears other views.

Submit "TAKING ON THE CRAZIES" to Facebook Submit "TAKING ON THE CRAZIES" to Twitter Submit "TAKING ON THE CRAZIES" to Google Submit "TAKING ON THE CRAZIES" to StumbleUpon Submit "TAKING ON THE CRAZIES" to Reddit Submit "TAKING ON THE CRAZIES" to Digg Submit "TAKING ON THE CRAZIES" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. TX's Avatar
    Greg, I have heard about the "fairness doctrine" and I hear that it's scaring the pants off of the radio talk show hosts. However, I highly doubt that congress would be able to bring it back and the president signs the law. Remember, this is the same present that invited radio talk to show hosts such as Gallagher, Hannity and Ingram to personally meet with them. Great how that turned out huh, these same losers helped derail his highest domestic priority. I guess we will see after the 2008 election.

    I don't know if you recall, but last year, around this same time a group tried to boycott Lou Dobbs by going after AOL. It didn't work. I don't know what it will take to take Lou Dobbs off the air. Even his incorrect statements about Leprosy doesn't prompt CNN to apologize, I don't know what it will take make CNN fire him. It's a shame what journalism in this country has come to.
  2. In Immigration Limbo's Avatar
    Just couldn't resist putting in my $.02 worth. The freedom enjoyed by Americans, including freedom of speech is one of the reasons I want to become an American in the first place. I don't like the fairness doctrine one little bit. I sure don't feel like I didn't get a chance to hear both sides of the CIR debate. Freedom of the press just shouldn't be diddled with, and this includes the freedom to make statements I don't agree with. In any case, I think talk radios influence is being overblown in regards to CIR.
  3. Greg Siskind's Avatar
    I generally agree on press freedoms, but do offer the reminder that radio and television channels are a limited commodity offered up the government. Given these airwaves belong to the people, there is an argument for the fairness doctrine.

    I would say that the same argument wouldn't apply to satellite radio or television, cable-only channels or the Internet where public ownership of the airwaves is not an issue.

    Boycotts can be very effective if they are well organized and publicized.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: