ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

ILW.COM EB-5 Blog

A Rose By Any Other Name - May Not Be So Active Management by Matt Gordon

Rate this Entry

In the
lone amendment of S. 744 passed by voice vote in committee on May 16, 2013, was
a potentially important and equally easy to overlook change to the section
heading in section 4805.  Previously the
section was entitled, "Alien Entrepreneurs", which pursuant to the amendment
was struck and replaced with the heading "Employment-Based Immigrants". 


This seems
to imply a very important shift in the legislative intent for post-investment activity
by the petitioner.  8 CFR ß204.6 (j) requires
that petitioner show proof that he or she "... is or will be engaged in the
management of the new commercial enterprise, either through the exercise of
day-to-day managerial control or through policy formulation, as opposed to
maintaining a purely passive role in regard to the investment."


The new
section heading implies a clear departure from the intent that the petitioner
actively manages the business which is the recipient of his or her investment
capital. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, an entrepreneur is "one
who organizes, manages, and assumes the risks of a business or
enterprise."  The existing requirements
of subsection (j) were entirely consistent with this definition.  The new section heading, "Employment-Based" is
both in the passive voice and result oriented. 
The heading says nothing about who creates or manages the business that
creates the employment.  Further, so long
as the desired employment is created by the new commercial enterprise that is
the recipient of the petitioner's investment capital, the petitioner would
satisfy the policy mandate of being an 'Employment-Based Immigrant'.



Of the many changes and improvements offered by
S.744 for the EB-5 program, this in particular, holds the potential to provide
additional pathways to apply EB-5 capital to business models which, under the
existing regime, would be far more difficult.



Download Leahy's Amendment


 

Submit "A Rose By Any Other Name - May Not Be So Active Management by Matt Gordon" to Facebook Submit "A Rose By Any Other Name - May Not Be So Active Management by Matt Gordon" to Twitter Submit "A Rose By Any Other Name - May Not Be So Active Management by Matt Gordon" to Google Submit "A Rose By Any Other Name - May Not Be So Active Management by Matt Gordon" to StumbleUpon Submit "A Rose By Any Other Name - May Not Be So Active Management by Matt Gordon" to Reddit Submit "A Rose By Any Other Name - May Not Be So Active Management by Matt Gordon" to Digg Submit "A Rose By Any Other Name - May Not Be So Active Management by Matt Gordon" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: