ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed


Letters of the Week: July 11- July 15

Rate this Entry

Please email your letters to or post them directly as "Comment" below.

Submit "Letters of the Week: July 11- July 15" to Facebook Submit "Letters of the Week: July 11- July 15" to Twitter Submit "Letters of the Week: July 11- July 15" to Google Submit "Letters of the Week: July 11- July 15" to StumbleUpon Submit "Letters of the Week: July 11- July 15" to Reddit Submit "Letters of the Week: July 11- July 15" to Digg Submit "Letters of the Week: July 11- July 15" to

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags


  1. Honza Prchal's Avatar
    Classic - both bad law and a ridiculous rights argument. States are put in this position by an immigration code that makes the income tax code look clean and simple. Still, it seems clear to me that he's hosed.

    Legal Ethics
    Can an Undocumented Immigrant Be Admitted to Practice? California Supreme Court Must Decide
    Posted Jul 6, 2011 5:56 PM CDT
    By Martha Neil


    Corrected: In what could be the first such case in the United States, a California State Bar panel is set to decide whether to deny an applicant a law license solely on the basis of his undocumented immigration status.

    Sergio Garcia was brought to this country from Mexico when he was 17 months old by his parents, the Daily Journal (sub. req.) reports in a lengthy article. The state bar only recently began asking applicants about their immigration status, so there apparently are other California lawyers already admitted to practice (the newspaper talked to at least one) who aren't legal residents of the U.S.

    Sponsored by a relative, Garcia says he's been waiting 17 years for a green card and expects it could be another 15 years before he gets one. Noting that the vetting process is supposed to be about character and fitness to practice, he says "What was my moral duty at 17 months?"

    The issue of whether an undocumented immigrant can properly be admitted to practice also appears to turn on federal constitutional powers and the authority of a state's supreme court to regulate the profession within its boundaries.

    A federal law, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, says state agencies can't extend so-called public benefits including professional licenses to undocumented aliens. But is the California Supreme Court a state agency?

    "I don't think that's been addressed," says professor Gerald Uelmen of the Santa Clara University School of Law.

    Updated on July 8 to correct the name of the Santa Clara University School of Law.
  2. Jay McTyier 's Avatar
    I think the issue will turn on whether there is a definition of "state agency" in the federal statute; or in federal court interpretation of that phrase in similar legislation in other contexts. If not, then I fear the plain language rule will apply. Although the state supreme court may not be seen as an agency of the state, similar to the lottery board or the alcoholic beverage control office, it is an agent of the state, in that it represents it's principal, the State of California, in discharging the duty of conducting and overseeing the adjudication of disputes in the state courts, including who may speak for others before those courts.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: