ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

IDBlog

Letters of the Week: April 25-May 1

Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.

Please email your letters to editor@ilw.com or post them directly as "Comment" below.

Submit "Letters of the Week: April 25-May 1" to Facebook Submit "Letters of the Week: April 25-May 1" to Twitter Submit "Letters of the Week: April 25-May 1" to Google Submit "Letters of the Week: April 25-May 1" to StumbleUpon Submit "Letters of the Week: April 25-May 1" to Reddit Submit "Letters of the Week: April 25-May 1" to Digg Submit "Letters of the Week: April 25-May 1" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Editor, ILW.COM's Avatar
    Welcome to Letters of the Week for the week of April 25 - May 1. Please post your letter in the comment box below or email us at editor@ilw.com.
  2. Honza Prchal's Avatar
    Is anyone aware if Luis Fortuno is still weighing a run for the GOP Presidential nomination? If so, what is his position on immigration reform?
  3. Jim Roberts's Avatar
    Dear Editor:

    Along with the usual misrepresentations and name calling, the Roger
    Algase blog of April 26th [ "Republicans, the birther madness and
    immigration"
    http://www.ilw.com/articles/2011,0426-algase.shtm ] typically arrives at

    the myopic conclusion that: "?The birther controversy is about one
    thing and one thing only - whether a black person can be a legitimate US

    president".
    Some seem to operate on the principle that confusing the issues
    contributes to obfuscating the truth. See: "Salt Lake Chamber Dupes the

    Supporters of the Utah Compact" by the Center for Immigration Studies

    http://www.cis.org/mortensen/salt-lake-chamber-dupes-supporters

    The birther issue is a "controversy" only because of such tactics. The
    truth is about "one thing and one thing only" and that is the
    Constitutional requirement of a president to be a natural born citizen
    as is more succinctly set forth in: "Press Lies on Obama Eligibility
    Get Louder" by JB Williams
    http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams146.htm

    The article points out that AZ Gov. Jan Brewer was wise to veto the AZ
    birther bill as it's focus was on the birth certificate issue and not
    the more important natural born citizen issue. The same questions were
    asked of presidential candidate John McCain which were resolved as both
    his parents were US citizens, contrary to Obama's situation who
    continues to hide not only his true birth records but also many other
    personal records. The obvious question that thinking Americans will not

    stop asking is WHY? The Constitutional requirement was designed to
    reduce foreign influence for US which is the same reason why Limits and
    Assimilation are essential to responsible immigration policies. See:
    ? Cal Thomas: "Assimilation preserves Nation's Identity"
    http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/022011/opi_788143329.shtml

    This would avoid the divisive hyphenated Americans and lack of
    allegiance that plagues US today that Pres. Teddy Roosevelt spoke of as
    well as the diversity chaos described in:
    http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty654.htm by Frosty
    Wooldridge

    Confusing and misstating the issues may work on some, but the truism
    that you can't fool all of the people all the time still applies.
    More's the pity that so many continue to try.

  4. Joseph P. Whalen's Avatar
    DHS has transmitted for publication in the Federal Register due tomorrow (Thurs. April 28, 2011), a Notice entitled "Removing Designated Countries from the National Security
    Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS)". http://www.ofr.gov/inspection.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

    The very last sentence reads: "This notice does not relieve any alien of any other requirement under the law." Does this last sentence mean that a past violation (failure to register) will still prevent approval of petitions and/or applications?

    --
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: