ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

Bloggings: Author Of Torture Memo Accuses Obama Of Violating The Constitution Through DACA. Should People Who Live In Constitutional Glass Houses Throw Ideological Stones? By Roger Algase

Rate this Entry

John Yoo, former Bush administration Justice Department lawyer and author of the infamous "Torture Memo", who is now a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley, has published an article along with co-author Robert J. Delahunty condemning the Obama administration for allegedly exceeding its Constitutional authority by granting a whole class of unauthorized immigrants a temporary deferment from deportation under DACA. The Obama Administration, the Dream Act and the Take Care Clause, Texas Law Review, Vol. 91, No.4,  2013 (September 9, 2012).


Yoo's basic premise is that the Constitution makes the role of Congress supreme in domestic matters, but gives the president almost unlimited authority over foreign affairs and national security. He concedes that immigration relates to both domestic and foreign affairs, but argues that it is still an issue over which Congressional power is greater than that of the president. He then goes on to refute various arguments to the effect that Congress has, by implication, delegated broad discretionary power over immigration to the president which can be used to justify DACA. His conclusion is that, based on his theory of very narrow presidential power over domestic matters, DACA is a clear abuse of executive power.


It is not my intention here to go into a detailed discussion of Yoo's article. However, even accepting his highly questionable conclusion that there is a fundamental difference between the limits of Congressional and presidential power depending on a distinction between domestic vs. foreign and national security affairs, his conclusion that immigration belongs primarily to the domestic area is hardly consistent with the almost universally accepted view that immigration is in large part a national security matter. To give just one of many examples, as a result of 9/11, immigration enforcement is carried out by the Department of Homeland Security.


Therefore if one accepts the dichotomy expounded in John Yoo's "Torture Memo" and his recent law review article between narrowly limited presidential power in domestic matters and almost unlimited presidential power in foreign affairs and national security, it would follow logically that there is nothing wrong within taking the waterboarding equipment out of mothballs and putting it to use on "national security" grounds in order to interrogate people who might either be unauthorized immigrants themselves or "aiding and abetting" unauthorized immigrants.


Examples of activity which, under the logic of Yoo's argument that the president has almost unlimited power over national security, might be waterboardable conduct, could be employing unauthorized immigrants, maintaining a family relationship with them or providing them with, say, medical treatment or religious counseling (not to mention legal advice).


In fairness, of course, nothing that John Yoo has written even remotely suggests that he actually favors the use of torture or "enhanced interrogation" as a method of immigration enforcement. But this conclusion follows inevitably from his basic premise that the Constitution places few, if any, limits on what a president can do in the area of foreign affairs or national security.


Why, therefore, is Yoo so anxious to argue in his latest article that the president's power of immigration is very narrowly limited? The answer seems obvious. President Obama is trying, through DACA, to provide relief to a certain limited class of people, namely DREAMers, who are in this country without legal status. But would Mr. Yoo's view of presidential power over immigration be so narrow if the government were trying to torture them instead? People who live in Constitutional glass houses should not throw ideological stones.



Submit "Bloggings: Author Of Torture Memo Accuses Obama Of Violating The Constitution Through DACA. Should People Who Live In Constitutional Glass Houses Throw Ideological Stones? By Roger Algase" to Facebook Submit "Bloggings: Author Of Torture Memo Accuses Obama Of Violating The Constitution Through DACA. Should People Who Live In Constitutional Glass Houses Throw Ideological Stones? By Roger Algase" to Twitter Submit "Bloggings: Author Of Torture Memo Accuses Obama Of Violating The Constitution Through DACA. Should People Who Live In Constitutional Glass Houses Throw Ideological Stones? By Roger Algase" to Google Submit "Bloggings: Author Of Torture Memo Accuses Obama Of Violating The Constitution Through DACA. Should People Who Live In Constitutional Glass Houses Throw Ideological Stones? By Roger Algase" to StumbleUpon Submit "Bloggings: Author Of Torture Memo Accuses Obama Of Violating The Constitution Through DACA. Should People Who Live In Constitutional Glass Houses Throw Ideological Stones? By Roger Algase" to Reddit Submit "Bloggings: Author Of Torture Memo Accuses Obama Of Violating The Constitution Through DACA. Should People Who Live In Constitutional Glass Houses Throw Ideological Stones? By Roger Algase" to Digg Submit "Bloggings: Author Of Torture Memo Accuses Obama Of Violating The Constitution Through DACA. Should People Who Live In Constitutional Glass Houses Throw Ideological Stones? By Roger Algase" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Matthew Kolken's Avatar
    You want to talk about torture Rodger?

    Watch this: http://youtu.be/v307H3lW-2k

    When is the current President going to put an end to the torture that is going on RIGHT NOW in our deportation detention centers?

    In his second term?

    You and I both know the answer is NEVER.

    The President's human rights record is a disgrace and is a black mark on the history of the United States.

    Obama's face should be put right next to Bush's on the Mount Rushmore of failed Presidents.
  2. Roger Algase's Avatar
    Matt, actually, an earlier version of this post that I submitted to ID on Tuesday included exactly the same point you are making about the torture that our current deportation system is inflicting on detainees and deportees. For some reason, that version of my post did not appear in Tuesday's ID. My next post will deal with this point and, I trust, will appear in ID shortly.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: