ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

Bloggings: BIA Puts Same-Sex Marriage Petitions On Hold, By: Danielle Beach

Rate this Entry

Constitution-gay-marriage-2


The Board of Immigration Appeals is leaning towards setting a precedent in Immigration
law that would eventually allow or prevent immigrants from seeking adjustment of status
based on same-sex marriage. Recently, three appeals and a motion to reopen were filed
with the BIA on behalf of same-sex married couples that duly registered their
relationships under state laws. In all four cases that originated in California,
Florida, New York and Pennsylvania, the BIA remanded the record to the relevant
District Director and Immigration judge for further proceedings.  In the meantime the
BIA refused to take a position on the constitutionality of DOMA due to lack of
jurisdiction.


The facts of the cases are identical. The petitioners filed the I-130visa petitions on
behalf of the same-sex spouses. Three marriages were concluded in the states that allow
gay marriages, and in one instance, the couple got married in Ontario, Canada, and was
subsequently granted domestic partnership (2004) and civil union status (2007) in the
state of New Jersey.


As it could be expected, the petitions were denied based on the section3 (a) of the
Defense of Marriage Act, Pub. L. No. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2149(1996) (DOMA).District
Directors (in denials) and DHS (in the opposition to the motion to reopen) argued that
the marriages and one civil union between the petitioners and beneficiaries were not
valid relationships for the purposes of Federal law pursuant to the section 3 (a) of
DOMA. The petitioners filed a motion to reopen and appeals with the BIA. The BIA agreed
and remanded the records for further proceedings ordering the parties to address the
following issues:


1)     Whether the petitioner and the beneficiary have a valid marriage under the state
        laws; and


2)     Whether, absent the requirement of section 3 of DOMA, the marriage of the
        petitioner and the beneficiary would qualify the beneficiary to be considered a
        "spouse" under the Immigration and Nationality Act.


Clearly, those remands are uncommon. They are an effort by the BIA indicating
responsiveness to the current society demands and changes. Hopefully, they can grow into
a landmark decision granting relief to deserving individuals.


image source

Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	b8fc122308.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	144.8 KB 
ID:	614  

Submit "Bloggings: BIA Puts Same-Sex Marriage Petitions On Hold, By: Danielle Beach" to Facebook Submit "Bloggings: BIA Puts Same-Sex Marriage Petitions On Hold, By: Danielle Beach" to Twitter Submit "Bloggings: BIA Puts Same-Sex Marriage Petitions On Hold, By: Danielle Beach" to Google Submit "Bloggings: BIA Puts Same-Sex Marriage Petitions On Hold, By: Danielle Beach" to StumbleUpon Submit "Bloggings: BIA Puts Same-Sex Marriage Petitions On Hold, By: Danielle Beach" to Reddit Submit "Bloggings: BIA Puts Same-Sex Marriage Petitions On Hold, By: Danielle Beach" to Digg Submit "Bloggings: BIA Puts Same-Sex Marriage Petitions On Hold, By: Danielle Beach" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: