ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

Bloggings: Is President Obama receiving an indirect political payback for his draconian immigration policies? And could Willard be even worse? By Roger Algase

Rate this Entry

It would be easy to think that the bottom is falling out of Barack Obama's re-election campaign. If one word could describe his recent statements and actions, it would be "inept". Beginning with his attacks on Willard's Bain Capital record, which were promptly contradicted by Obama's own surrogates, and continuing with the Democrats' disastrous loss in Wisconsin where the president, incredibly, now says he was "too busy" to campaign in person, followed by his latest gaffe about how the private sector is "doing fine", Obama appears determined to run one of  the worst presidential re-election campaigns since Jimmy Carter.


In addition, the president is up against the money obstacle. Romney wiped the floor with him in raising campaign money during May, and Obama's super-pac is said to have only a few million dollars on hand, while Karl Rove and the Koch brothers are reportedly on target to raising a billion dollars for their attack ads. And this is before the Supreme Court throws out Obama's signature health care reform law and upholds Arizona's S.B. 1070 Hispanic immigrant persecution law, as is expected soon by everyone except the most confirmed wishful thinkers. 


Never mind that at least some of the criticism of the president is one-sided and unfair: Romney's record as a venture capitalist is indeed fair game. Nor was Wisconsin a total disaster for the Democrats. They took back the state Senate, meaning that Governor Scott Walker has lost his power to impose any more of his far right wing, union-busting agenda. And while the private sector is not "doing fine", there are good economic arguments for believing that it would be a lot worse off if the Republicans were in power.


Furthermore, Obama is still capable of talking a good game in favor of justice and humanity, as in the case of his support for same-sex marriage equality rights. (So green cards for gay and lesbian marriage partners are just around the corner, right? Don't hold your breath.)  But the media and the public do not seem to be interested in anything that might be favorable to Obama. The president is clearly losing his former magic touch, and the mood of the country is turning against him. 


There is a law of cause and effect in life, and politics. The effects of an action do not always come from the immediate cause, but sometimes from an entirely different direction. President Obama has been pursuing one of the most cynical, cruel and inhumane immigration policies of any president in modern history, with record numbers of deportations and breakups of families, many with US citizen members, together with a relentless agenda of harassment against employers who commit the "crime" of daring to sponsor professional workers for legal visas.


Meanwhile, under the Obama administration, deaths in immigration detention and at the Mexican border comtinue unabated. While this may gain him a few white votes, there has to be something fundamentally wrong with a president who thinks that he needs to engage in violations of basic human rights in order to remain politically viable. This is not only a serious political miscalculation, which is likely to make many Hispanic and other minority US citizens, whose support he badly needs, stay home this fall (even if they are allowed to vote despite the voter suppression strategy that many Republican states are pursuing). It is also a serious comment on the president's fitness to continue to hold office.


The perception that President Obama, instead of being a shining knight of "change" that so many of us once thought he was, may be one of the most calculating, cynical, manipulative, and even less forgivable, inept, presidents in modern history, could well be at the root of his growing unpopularity today. What goes around comes around.


All this being said, Willard Romney could not possibly be worse for immigration, right? Let's take a closer look. In April, 2012, the Center for American Progress Action Fund issued a report entitled: Nightmare Ahead: What a Romney-Rubio Presidency Would Mean For Immigration. This report lists, inter alia, the following regressive legislative and administrative priorities we can expect from a Romney administration:


1) Make E-Verify mandatory for all employers;


2) Support for states seeking to pass anti-immigrant laws like Arizona's;


3) Implementing a nationwide strategy of "attrition" or "self deportation" by making life so miserable for unauthorized immigrants that they will want to leave;


4) Elimination of "Prosecutorial Discretion", which has at least helped a lucky few gain relief from deportation and holds out the hope that a few more very fortunate people might benefit;


5) Construction of another 1,400 miles of a wasteful, expensive border fence. 


The above are only some of the anti-immigrant policies we could expect from an administration that would owe its existence in large part to having successfully appealed to the prejucices of white voters in both the primary and the general election. 


As I have said before, some of the passengers on the Titanic may have had a problem with the deck chairs. But the ship was still better off without the iceberg. Willard Romney's immigration iceberg may be on the way.

Submit "Bloggings: Is President Obama receiving an indirect political payback for his draconian immigration policies? And could Willard be even worse? By Roger Algase" to Facebook Submit "Bloggings: Is President Obama receiving an indirect political payback for his draconian immigration policies? And could Willard be even worse? By Roger Algase" to Twitter Submit "Bloggings: Is President Obama receiving an indirect political payback for his draconian immigration policies? And could Willard be even worse? By Roger Algase" to Google Submit "Bloggings: Is President Obama receiving an indirect political payback for his draconian immigration policies? And could Willard be even worse? By Roger Algase" to StumbleUpon Submit "Bloggings: Is President Obama receiving an indirect political payback for his draconian immigration policies? And could Willard be even worse? By Roger Algase" to Reddit Submit "Bloggings: Is President Obama receiving an indirect political payback for his draconian immigration policies? And could Willard be even worse? By Roger Algase" to Digg Submit "Bloggings: Is President Obama receiving an indirect political payback for his draconian immigration policies? And could Willard be even worse? By Roger Algase" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Peter Allen's Avatar
    However where is the Congressional leadership on the immigration issue. For some reason, Republicans feel that can rally the base around a distorted anti-immigration agenda, but Democrats are too timid to go beyond the Dream Act and deal with the issue of immigration by an international point of view. No one in a leadership position in either major party is willing to give voice to the idea that immigration is related to national, regional and global prosperity. The narrow and largely retrograde vision of both parties when it comes to immigration is likely to have serious consequences for the U.S. in the increasingly tight world market for labor.
  2. Roger Algase's Avatar
    Peter Allen makes a very good point. What is the reason that both parties take such a narrow view on immigration and are unable to see beyond their own noses when it comes to its economic benefits? My answer would be that immigration is and always has been tied up with race and demographics in America.

    This is especially true now, when Latino and Asian immigration, legal and otherwise, means that soon America will no longer be a country with a white, "Anglo" majority. To my way of thinking, the correct response to that issue would be to say: "Oh, really? OK, now let's change the subject and talk about America's real problems."

    Unfortunately, there are a lot of people out there who would give quite a different answer, especially in the party of Abraham Lincoln (and even Ronald Reagan). Until this changes, we may have to wait a long time for immigration reform.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: