ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

Bloggings: New Bia Case States That An “Aged-Out” Child Still Qualifies For Derivative Asylum, By: Danielle Beach-Oswald

Rate this Entry

In a recent case decided by the BIA, Matter of A-Y-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 791 (BIA2012), the Board
reversed the decision of an immigration judge ("IJ") in California. The Board found that
the 23-year-old unmarried child was eligible for derivative asylum status since she was
under 21 when the asylum application was pending. This is not news to most of us who have
been applying this, however, there may be possibly other extensions of meaning that can be
drawn from this and now it is established in case law.


In order to prevent the children of asylum applicants from losing their eligibility due to
"aging out," Congress enacted the Child Status Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 107-208, 116 Stat.
927 (2002) ("CSPA"). The CSPA explains that an unmarried alien seeking derivative asylum
status based on the approval of the parent's asylum application and who turned 21 while the
application was pending is still considered a "child" for the purpose of acquiring
derivative asylee status under Section 208 (b)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,
8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(3)(B) (2006).


The respondent, a 23-year-old unmarried native and citizen of El Salvador, was found
inadmissible, denied relief based on asylum claim and ordered removed from the US because
she reached the age of 21 before her mother's application for asylum was granted.The
respondent appealed to BIA from the IJ's decision. At the time when the respondent's mother
applied for asylum, she was 16 years old and included in her mother's I-589 application.
Precisely, when her mother submitted the asylum application, she was 17 and unmarried. The
IJ granted asylum to respondent's mother, but not to the "aged out" respondent who was 22
at that time.  This is astounding in and of itself since the CSPA has been applied since
2002 on this scenario.


Fortunately, the Child Status Protection Act prevents such ill-fated consequences for the
children of asylum applicants. The CSPA amended section 208(b)(3)(B) expanding eligibility
for potential derivative asylees. The provision clearly applied to the respondent also
because her mother filed for asylum after the CSPA was enacted in 2002.Therefore, the
respondent statutorily qualified as a "child" for the purpose of establishing eligibility
for derivative status under section 208(b)(3)(B). Based on this, the Board of Immigration
Appeals (BIA) concluded that the respondent warranted a grant of derivative status and
remanded the matter to the IJ.

Submit "Bloggings: New Bia Case States That An “Aged-Out” Child Still Qualifies For Derivative Asylum, By: Danielle Beach-Oswald" to Facebook Submit "Bloggings: New Bia Case States That An “Aged-Out” Child Still Qualifies For Derivative Asylum, By: Danielle Beach-Oswald" to Twitter Submit "Bloggings: New Bia Case States That An “Aged-Out” Child Still Qualifies For Derivative Asylum, By: Danielle Beach-Oswald" to Google Submit "Bloggings: New Bia Case States That An “Aged-Out” Child Still Qualifies For Derivative Asylum, By: Danielle Beach-Oswald" to StumbleUpon Submit "Bloggings: New Bia Case States That An “Aged-Out” Child Still Qualifies For Derivative Asylum, By: Danielle Beach-Oswald" to Reddit Submit "Bloggings: New Bia Case States That An “Aged-Out” Child Still Qualifies For Derivative Asylum, By: Danielle Beach-Oswald" to Digg Submit "Bloggings: New Bia Case States That An “Aged-Out” Child Still Qualifies For Derivative Asylum, By: Danielle Beach-Oswald" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: