ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

Bloggings: Money and Hate Dominate the Presidential Race, by Roger Algase

Rate this Entry

My comments on this year's election are not meant to be partisan, but only to provide one writer's views on political developments from an immigration perspective. However, because the only contest is on the Republican side, and Obama's record on immigration is already a known quantity, to the great distress and disappointment of a million people who have become victims of his mad rush to make America into a Deportation Nation, the focus inevitably falls on the Republicans.

Probably within hours after this blogging appears, the focus will in all likelihood fall on fewer Republicans than at the time of writing. After the Iowa circus (sorry, I meant "caucus") votes are counted, it is unlikely that Michele Bachmann will still be in the race. Rick Perry also, despite his continuing access to big Texas money, will probably be on his way out. Newt Gingrich's political career may also be ready for its long awaited, overdue demise.

But one thing is common among almost all the Republicans, whether Iowa turns out to be their last hurrah or whether they still live to fight in another state, despite (or in Romney's case, because of), Romney's overwhelming money machine. Here, if I can be forgiven a brief digression into classical literature, there is a parallel with Virgil's epic poem about Aeneas, the legendary Trojan immigrant to Italy who, fato profugus (exiled by fate) became one of the world's most famous "political refugees".

In Book 1 of the Aeneid, Virgil mentions the destructive power of the huge winds and storms which the god Aeolus keeps locked up in a vast underground cave. The poet describes what would happen if Aeolus were to stop controlling the winds: ni faciat, maria ac terras caelumque profundum/quippe ferant rapidi, secum verrantque per auras. ("If he did not do so, the winds would surely sweep the seas, the land and the broad sky itself with them up to the heavens".)

In the same way, Romney's PAC money is showing its tremendous power to blow away his opponents, one by one (beginning with the hapless Newt Gingrich - it couldn't happen to a nicer bigot), after Romney's unlimited money was unleashed from its underground Consitutional cavern by the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. However, to get back to the main topic, both the Republican candidiates still left in the presidential race and those blown overboard, or about to be, by Romney's money machine share one thing in common, almost down to the last man (or woman).

This common feature is also decribed by Virgil as: saevae memorem Junonis ob iram ("because of savage Juno's unrelenting rage"). Most of the major Republicans (with the exception of Jon Huntsman, who, from the start, has appeared to be far too rational ever to be a real candidate, and also Ron Paul), are masters of prejudice and hate.

Two of the candidates, Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum, are homophobic to the point of obsession. Their hatred of gays seems to be so deep that it is hard to avoid using the word pathological. Newt Gingrich's hatred of Muslims, including millions of loyal, law abiding Americans and immigrants whom he accuses of wanting to impose "Sharia Law" on the United States, also comes close to being a pathological obsession (though a very convenient and opportunistic one).

But what every Republican candidate (again with the honorable exception of that non-candidate, Hunstman, and also of Ron Paul, who had made clear that deporting every single last immigrant who is here without legal status will not and should not happen) has shown so far, is extreme and unrelenting hatred of immigrants, especially Latinos. Perry, who began by "having a heart" on immigration, has since lost his heart to accused serial human rights violator Joe Arpiao, who now campaigns together with Perry.  

Gingrich still has a little heart left, but only for unauthorized immigrants who have been here for 25 years, go to church (no Muslims need apply) and can pass muster with community boards (i.e."deportation panels"). But no one need accuse Romney or Bachmann of having any mercy for Latino or other minority immigrants. Bachmann would like every state to pass an Arizona type law, and Romney wants to deport every "DREAMER" (and all other unauthorized immigrants) in America. 

The battle for the White House will most likely be between a Republican challenger who exploits prejudice, and a Democratic incumbent who caves into it. More than in any other contest in recent memory, hatred of immigrants may be the deciding factor.





Submit "Bloggings: Money and Hate Dominate the Presidential Race, by Roger Algase" to Facebook Submit "Bloggings: Money and Hate Dominate the Presidential Race, by Roger Algase" to Twitter Submit "Bloggings: Money and Hate Dominate the Presidential Race, by Roger Algase" to Google Submit "Bloggings: Money and Hate Dominate the Presidential Race, by Roger Algase" to StumbleUpon Submit "Bloggings: Money and Hate Dominate the Presidential Race, by Roger Algase" to Reddit Submit "Bloggings: Money and Hate Dominate the Presidential Race, by Roger Algase" to Digg Submit "Bloggings: Money and Hate Dominate the Presidential Race, by Roger Algase" to

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags


  1. Jack's Avatar
    Based on your posts, I wonder if you think it's possible for someone to strongly support immigration law and its enforcement without being considered a "hater"?

    "every Republican candidate [except Hunstman and Paul] has shown so far, is extreme and unrelenting hatred of immigrants, especially Latinos."

    If an uninvited person is residing in this country, I do not think they should be here and believe it's wrong to just look the other way. In other words, I think limiting immigration is legitimate. Unless limiting immigration is unjust, what is wrong with supporting that law? Do you think limiting immigration is unjust and an illegitimate act of a sovereign? If so, you should make that explicit. If not, your protests strike me as incoherent.
  2. Roger Algase's Avatar
    Jack, under our Constitution, the "sovereign" for purposes of immigration law enforcement is the federal government, not the 50 states. Congress has not only placed limits on immigration, which all of us support in principle, but has given the executive branch wide discretion over how to enforce the immigration laws, including balancing the need to limit immigration with other concerns, such as avoiding family breakup, preserving the right to due process, and preventing the egregious types of human rights abuses that states such as Arizona and Alabama are now carrying out under the color of their own, police state, racial profiling, unconstitutional, immigration laws.

    One important reason (though far from the only one) that these state laws are unconstitutional is that they are intended to subvert the sovereign power of the United States of America to decide how to enforce the immigration laws by, in effect, limiting or ignoring federal power to temper "justice", namely enforcement, with mercy, i.e. humanitarian and practical considerations.

    Why are so many Republican-dominated states, not to mention most of the Republican presidential candidates, so much in favor of supporting these blatant attempts to usurp and undermine the sovereign power of our great nation? Because the issue is not really one of "sovereignty" at all, any more than the Southern segregation laws were issues of "states rights".

    Just as "states rights" was a code phrase in the pre-civil rights era for upholding bigotry against African-Americans, "sovereignty" has become a code word for upholding bigotry against Latinos and other brown - skinned immigrants now. I am not accusing you personally of using this term as a code word. I am only talking about the way it is commonly understood now. Sadly, it has become a code word among many people for hate.

    There is also something known as reality in immigration law enforcement. The best, if not the most polished, statement of this was by our most recent Republican president, George W. Bush, who said: "You can't simply kick 12 million people out of your country." That is simple reality, something that most of today's Republican presidential candidates (unlike their hero, Ronald Reagan, who legalized 2 million people) simply ignore.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: