ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

Bloggings: Clarification of previous comments about H-1B, by Roger Algase

Rate this Entry

I would like to make a clarification: in my December 7 ID blogging, I made reference to comments by two other attorneys who had received obviously incompetent and/or biased RFE's from USCIS examiners in H-1B cases, Greg Siskind (December 6 ID) and Jacob Sapochnik (December 5 ID). I also described some appoaches that I use when I file H-1B cases, one of which is to provide a detailed job description.


I did not mean to imply in my comment that either of these two distinguished attorneys had omitted to provide detailed job descriptions in the cases that they described; I am sure that both of them did provide job descriptions, as well as doing everything else that a top level H-1B lawyer normally does to support an H-1B case. The subject matter of their comments, obviously, was the need for more capable immigration examiners, and their point, with which I entirely agree, was that no matter how well a lawyer prepares a case, and how much merit the case has, some immigration examiners either lack the ability to understand the case, have a mindset against approving it, or both. 


This raises the question of what to do when encountering an RFE from an obviously incompetent or biased examiner. In this situation, my approach is, if at all possible, to shop for a different examiner. One way of doing this, if the case was filed through the regular procedure, is to switch it to premium processing. My experience has been that premium processing examiners tend to be, on the average, more experienced and better trained, though this is not always the case by any means.


Another way, though one that may be harder to convince a client to use, is simply to refile the case, if H-1B visas are still available or if the quota limit does not apply. A couple of years ago, I had an H-1B case where the (premium processing) examiner was so clearly unreasonable that I should have taken my own advice. Instead, I chose to battle it out, as Mr. Sapochnik did with the clearly unreasonable examiner mentioned in his article, and my case was also initially denied. 


I promptly refiled the case, even though this meant paying another premium filing fee, and the case, with the same facts and the same evidence, was approved the second time without too much difficulty. Greg Siskind and Jacob Sapochnik have done us all a great service by pointing out the problem of biased and incompetent immigration examiners. We all know they exist, and not only in H-1B cases. We should not let ourselves be intimidated by them.

Submit "Bloggings: Clarification of previous comments about H-1B, by Roger Algase" to Facebook Submit "Bloggings: Clarification of previous comments about H-1B, by Roger Algase" to Twitter Submit "Bloggings: Clarification of previous comments about H-1B, by Roger Algase" to Google Submit "Bloggings: Clarification of previous comments about H-1B, by Roger Algase" to StumbleUpon Submit "Bloggings: Clarification of previous comments about H-1B, by Roger Algase" to Reddit Submit "Bloggings: Clarification of previous comments about H-1B, by Roger Algase" to Digg Submit "Bloggings: Clarification of previous comments about H-1B, by Roger Algase" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: