ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Jason Dzubow on Political Asylum

DHS Ombudsman on Unaccompanied Child Asylum Seekers

Rate this Entry
The DHS Office of the Ombudsman recently issued formal
recommendations for the treatment of unaccompanied minor asylum
seekers.* The report is entitled Ensuring a Fair and Effective Asylum Process for Unaccompanied Alien Children.

In 2008, the law was changed so that review of unaccompanied child
asylum cases was shifted from EOIR (the Immigration Courts) to USCIS (William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act).* The Ombudsman's recommendations address problems with the implementation of the new law.

Statistics about the number of unaccompanied child asylum applicants are hard to come by.* According to the DHS Yearbook on Immigration Statistics,
in FY 2011, there were 76 children under age 16 granted asylum and a
total of 569 people under age 19 granted asylum.* These figures do not
include dependent children.** Also, these are the number of asylum
applications granted.* I did not find information about the number of
denied asylum cases for unaccompanied children.


A USCIS employee works on writing regulations.



The Ombudsman's recommendations touch on a number of problems,
including redetermining unaccompanied alien child ("UAC") status,
difficulty rescheduling UAC interviews, inadequate methods and
approaches to adjudication, and the failure of USCIS to issue
regulations concerning UAC cases.* The Ombudsman made the following
recommendations:


  1. Accept jurisdiction of UAC cases referred by the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
  2. Accept jurisdiction of cases filed by children in federal custody under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.*
  3. Follow established UAC-specific procedures, expand implementation of
    certain best practices, and enlist clinical experts for quality
    assurance and training.*
  4. Limit Headquarters review to a process that can be managed within 30 days.
  5. Issue as soon as possible regulations regarding the UAC asylum process.


I want to comment on two of these recommendations.* First, the always
exciting issue of jurisdiction.* It seems that the current procedure is
for EOIR or CBP (Customs and Border Protection) to make a determination
that the alien is an unaccompanied child asylum seeker.* Once that
determination is made, the alien's case is transferred to USCIS.* The
USCIS Asylum Office then re-determines whether the alien is an
unaccompanied child.* Essentially, the child-who may not have any
documentation or other evidence about her age-is forced to prove that
she is a child during two separate interviews.* If she fails to do so,
potentially her case will be bounced back to EOIR, which has already
determined that it does not have jurisdiction.* This seems like a
potential problem for the alien; not mention a waste of resources for
the government.

The second issue, which is probably more problematic, is the
Ombudsman's recommendation that USCIS issue regulations implementing the
2008 law.* Four years after the law was passed, USCIS has still not
issued regulations concerning unaccompanied child asylum seekers.* This
reminds me of the failure to issue regulations for the Violence Against
Women Act ("VAWA").* For years, immigration attorneys used an informal
application process for VAWA cases because no regulations were issued.*
Although I understand that issuing regulations can be complicated, I
don't see why it should take years.* Regulations are important to help
guide adjudicators and attorneys, and to ensure fairness.* Of course,
the Ombudsman cannot compel USCIS to issue regulations, but I would have
liked to see a stronger statement about this problem.

Overall, the Ombudsman's recommendations seem sensible.* Hopefully,
USCIS will take its own advice and implement the recommendations
promptly.

Originally posted on the Asylumist: www.Asylumist.com.

Submit "DHS Ombudsman on Unaccompanied Child Asylum Seekers" to Facebook Submit "DHS Ombudsman on Unaccompanied Child Asylum Seekers" to Twitter Submit "DHS Ombudsman on Unaccompanied Child Asylum Seekers" to Google Submit "DHS Ombudsman on Unaccompanied Child Asylum Seekers" to StumbleUpon Submit "DHS Ombudsman on Unaccompanied Child Asylum Seekers" to Reddit Submit "DHS Ombudsman on Unaccompanied Child Asylum Seekers" to Digg Submit "DHS Ombudsman on Unaccompanied Child Asylum Seekers" to del.icio.us

Updated 07-16-2013 at 02:03 PM by JDzubow

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: