ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Jason Dzubow on Political Asylum

Strauss-Kahn’s Accuser May Have Lied to Gain Asylum in the US

Rate this Entry

As the sexual assault case against former International Monetary Fund head and potential French president Dominique Strauss-Kahn appears to be falling apart, attention has turned to the woman who accused him of attacking her. 


NY City Maids may have judged Mr. Strauss-Kahn too quickly.

Mr. Strauss-Kahn was initially arrested in May and charged with attempting to rape a maid in his New York hotel room.  He was released under very strict supervision and resigned his job at the IMF.  Now, the conditions of his release have been dramatically eased, and the case against him appears on the verge of collapse.  The reversal came about because the NY Police Department uncovered evidence that the purported victim lied about the incident and has committed various acts of fraud, including filing a phony claim for asylum.

The alleged victim is a Guinean woman who obtained her status in the U.S. in 2004 by claiming political asylum.  The Daily Mail reports that the victim admitted to the NYPD that much of her asylum claim had been fabricated:

In her application for asylum to the U.S. for herself and her daughter in 2004 she said that the home she shared with her husband in Guinea was burned by soldiers for the country's regime. Her husband was then supposedly tortured in jail where he died of his injuries.  According to prosecutors, she later admitted this was a lie.  Prosecutors also said that she cried when she recounted to them the story from her asylum application of how she had been gang-raped in Guinea, but later admitted that this was also a lie.

The (probably) false asylum application, combined with other evidence of fraud (including a taped phone conversation where the victim indicated she hoped to make money by pursuing charges against Mr. Strauss-Kahn) have led the prosecution to radically re-assess the credibility of the victim and the strength of their case. 

If it turns out that the victim did lie on her asylum application, she faces deportation and potential jail time.  But in evaluating what happened in her asylum case (and in the Strauss-Kahn affair), there are a few points to keep in mind.  First, many asylum seekers with legitimate claims augment their stories with the encouragement of unscrupulous lawyers or notarios.  Such asylum seekers do not understand the law and they merely follow the instructions of their lawyers.  In this way, legitimate asylum seekers are sometimes denied asylum and (rightly) accused of fraud.  Of course, even though such people are naive and are victims of dishonest attorneys, they are responsible for their own actions and they need to be held accountable.  As the authorities investigate the Guinean woman and her asylum claim, they should determine who helped prepare the asylum case and-if that person was involved in the fraud-they should prosecute the person responsible.  While asylum fraud is a problem, the best way to reduce fraud is to prosecute the attorneys or notarios who prepare fraudulent claims.

In addition, we should keep in mind that the Guinean woman is innocent until proven guilty.  After Mr. Strauss-Kahn's arrest, the press and the District Attorney essentially convicted him before evaluating the evidence.  We should not make the same mistake again.  Rather than rush to judgment, we should wait for the case to develop and see where the evidence leads.  Asylum seekers are often people who have suffered severe traumas.  Such people are particularly susceptible to manipulation and intimidation, and might sometimes change their stories under pressure.  Maybe that is what happened here, and maybe not.  Since we don't yet know, we should take a lesson from the case of Mr. Strauss-Kahn, and avoid reaching a conclusion until we know more.

Originally published on the Asylumist:

Submit "Strauss-Kahn’s Accuser May Have Lied to Gain Asylum in the US" to Facebook Submit "Strauss-Kahn’s Accuser May Have Lied to Gain Asylum in the US" to Twitter Submit "Strauss-Kahn’s Accuser May Have Lied to Gain Asylum in the US" to Google Submit "Strauss-Kahn’s Accuser May Have Lied to Gain Asylum in the US" to StumbleUpon Submit "Strauss-Kahn’s Accuser May Have Lied to Gain Asylum in the US" to Reddit Submit "Strauss-Kahn’s Accuser May Have Lied to Gain Asylum in the US" to Digg Submit "Strauss-Kahn’s Accuser May Have Lied to Gain Asylum in the US" to

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags


  1. Don Miller's Avatar
    What is Dzubow saying here...that an asylum applicant might have falsified information, maybe even (gasp) lied, on her application of asylum? Absolutely impossible, IMHO. We all know, those of us who read this site regularly, that all immigrants and asylees and refugees et al are nothing but the very finest, most decent, upright and deserving folks ever to grace the planet and any who might doubt or question this are most certainly RACISTS!
    Same for those who feel, mistakenly to be sure, that the asylum, refugee, and indeed the entire immigration programs are complete scams perpetrated on the American people by their own Government and several wealthy and shrill pressure groups! Shame on them!
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: