ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Chris Musillo on Nurse and Allied Health Immigration

What the USCIS learned

Rate this Entry

 

Does the USCIS fully understand the law and the legal implications of the Neufeld Memorandum? An April 15, 2010 Executive Summary of a recent teleconference implies that the Service may be getting the message, although the Executive Summary may confuse as much as it informs.

The Neufeld Memo's main flaw is that it misreads the underlying regulation. 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(ii) holds that a U.S. employer is indicated by five characteristics: hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise control. This regulation is controlling. Incorrectly, the Neufeld Memo implies that "right of control" is a superior characteristic encompassing the other characteristics.

In order to attempt to get its hands around the growing confusion, the USCIS held a Listening Session on March 26, 2010. MU's attended and participated at the Session.


The USCIS' recently released Executive Summary from that session recognizes that "if" right of control is required, then the Neufeld Memo contradicts the existing regulation. The Executive Summary goes further and agrees that "if" right of control is only one of the five elements, then an amendment is needed to the Memo.

These are not small issues. Staffing companies use the H-1B visa to supply staff to third-party worksites, mainly where well-documented US supply is short. At this point, it simply makes sense for the USCIS to suspend or withdraw the Neufeld Memorandum. At best, the Memo makes a confusing area of law incomprehensible. At worst, it takes a simple regulation and misapplies it.

Submit "What the USCIS learned" to Facebook Submit "What the USCIS learned" to Twitter Submit "What the USCIS learned" to Google Submit "What the USCIS learned" to StumbleUpon Submit "What the USCIS learned" to Reddit Submit "What the USCIS learned" to Digg Submit "What the USCIS learned" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Mandy's Avatar
    Hi Chris,
    If USCIS withdraw the Neufeld Memo I wonder if my H1b petition would be filed soon? Why RN's petitions were deined by USCIS in the past months while the approval rate for Therapists was unchanged(Ms.Bacon)? Thanks!
  2. Chris Musillo's Avatar
    @ Mandy-

    RN positions are generally not eligible for H-1B visas. See:

    http://www.musillo.com/2009/08/h-1b-for-nurses.html

    -Chris
  3. BB's Avatar
    Employers can legally discriminate against qualified Americans by firing them without cause and recruiting only H-1B guest-workers to replace them. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has said: "H-1B workers may be hired even when a qualified U.S. worker wants the job, and a U.S. worker can be displaced from the job in favor of a foreign worker." Some companies that discriminate against American workers are so brazen that their job advertisements say "H-1B visa holders only." And some companies in the United States have workforces that consist almost entirely of H-1B guest-workers.
  4. Ronald Nair's Avatar
    I cannot wait for the lawsuits to be filed on this USCIS needs to be taught a lesson to use the APA!
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: