ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Matthew Kolken on Deportation And Removal

NY Times Report: "Growing Number" of American Citizens being Detained by the Obama Administration's "Immigration Crackdown"

Rate this Entry

Julia Preston of the New York Times reports that the Obama administration is detaining an increasing number of United States citizens as "illegal immigrants" as a result of "flawed information" from Department of Homeland Security (DHS) databases.  The databases instruct local police to hold the individual for investigation for possible deportation.


The article gives examples of citizens that are being caught up in the Secure Communities deportation program that requires the fingerprinting of every individual booked at local jails.  The fingerprints are then cross-checked against DHS immigration databases. If a check returns positive an immigration hold is placed on the individual, enabling local law enforcement to detain the individual for up to 48 hours.  A false positive can be triggered in a Secure Communities fingerprint check because of "flukes" in the databases. 


It is unknow how many American citizens have been erroneously detained because, conveneintly, the Obama administration does not keep statistics on false positives. One study has been conducted, however, that reveals that 82 citizens were held in Arizona immigration detention centers for as long as a year before an immigration ultimately determined that they were United States citizens.


Click here to read more of the article.  It is worth your time.

Submit "NY Times Report: Submit "NY Times Report: Submit "NY Times Report: Submit "NY Times Report: Submit "NY Times Report: Submit "NY Times Report: Submit "NY Times Report:

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Jack's Avatar
    Do they prefer judgment calls and biases of officers? This is preferable but it's never fix the database system but throw the baby out with the bathwater. Bad faith apologists don't care a whit about due process and bad faith critics will never be satisfied and don't want to work towards improving the sytem. When the ACLU sues, e.g., Hazleton, PA, they just want to stop enforcement of immigration law. I've yet to hear them say that an enforcement scheme would be legal by doing x.

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: