ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy

Grassley Admits Senate Bill is Not "Amnesty"

Rate this Entry
America's Voice reports

During a meeting today with constituents in Rock Rapids, Iowa, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)—one of the chief opponents of the Senate immigration bill—conceded that the legislation is not amnesty.

In response to a constituent’s question—“Do you consider the Senate immigration bill amnesty?”—Grassley replied, “I don’t use that word. [The Senate bill] is a little bit different than what we did in 1986. I would call the immigration bill in 1986 amnesty.”

Grassley went on to explain the flaws in the 1986 bill and its inadequate provisions for border security. In comparison, the Senate bill as written by the Gang of 8 earlier this year contained clauses that required strict border security before legalization could begin. And that was before the Corker-Hoeven amendment was added to the bill, and nearly $40 billion more in funds for immigration enforcement was attached.

Rock Rapids is located deep in Steve King's congressional district, one of the most conservative parts of Iowa. But even there, 65% of likely voters--King's own constituents--support a pathway to citizenship. While anti-immigrant blowhards like Steve King continue to rail against all immigration reform as "amnesty," Grassley’s insistence that the Senate bill is not that puts him closer to immigration reform supporters like Jeff Flake and John McCain, who said just yesterday that the Senate bill’s

13-year wait and strict penalties precludes the legislation from being amnesty.
As Grassley himself said today, “Putting conditions ahead of legalization”—which is what the Senate bill does, via onerous requirements like a 13-year-wait, the payment of back taxes, learning English, and other provisions—“would preempt the use of the word amnesty.”

Grassley also said that House Republicans do not intend to kill immigration reform, but rather to pass bills that increase border security. With at least 24 House Republicans and 200 House Democrats supporting comprehensive immigration reform with a path to citizenship, advocates this fall will be mobilizing harder than ever to ensure that real immigration reform--one that includes not just border security but a path to citizenship--becomes a reality.

The link to the video can be found here.

Submit "Grassley Admits Senate Bill is Not "Amnesty"" to Facebook Submit "Grassley Admits Senate Bill is Not "Amnesty"" to Twitter Submit "Grassley Admits Senate Bill is Not "Amnesty"" to Google Submit "Grassley Admits Senate Bill is Not "Amnesty"" to StumbleUpon Submit "Grassley Admits Senate Bill is Not "Amnesty"" to Reddit Submit "Grassley Admits Senate Bill is Not "Amnesty"" to Digg Submit "Grassley Admits Senate Bill is Not "Amnesty"" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

  1. Jack2's Avatar
    the Senate bill as written by the Gang of 8 earlier this year contained clauses that required strict border security before legalization could begin.
    RPI status is the beginning of legalization. What "strict border security" is required before that? None.


    ?Putting conditions ahead of legalization??which is what the Senate bill does, via onerous requirements like a 13-year-wait, the payment of back taxes, learning English, and other provisions

    No, "America's Voice", the Senate bill does not put conditions ahead of legalization. Grassley even said, "I voted against the immigration bill in the Senate because it did legalization before border security." There is also no requirement to learn English.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: