ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
© 1995-
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Carl Shusterman's Immigration Update

ICE's Bed Mandate: Who Benefits?

Rate this Entry
Illegal crossings along the U.S.-Mexican border have diminished greatly. The Administration’s DACA policy has saved hundreds of thousands of young people from possible deportation. The GOP is pressing for deep cuts in the federal budget.

So why is ICE locking up more persons than ever before, and spending much more money than in previous years?

The simple answer is the “bed mandate”.

The what?

Back in 2009, the late Senator Robert Byrd (D-VA) amended a DHS appropriations bill to require ICE to keep a minimum of 33,400 persons locked up at all times. ICE thus became the only agency in the entire federal government to have a minimum quota on the number of people that they must keep in jail. Congress later raised the bed mandate to 34,000.

Since 2005, the number of persons in ICE detention has risen 72%, and this costs the taxpayers $2 billion annually. Even former DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano calls the bed mandate artificial and unnecessary. Instead of releasing low-risk persons with ankle bracelets, ICE is forced to spend $120 per prisoner per day.

Ironically, the GOP has blocked efforts to repeal the bed mandate even though it smacks of government waste and inefficiency.

Why? Follow the money.

Private companies, the Corrections Corporation and Geo Group, imprison over 60% of ICE detainees. The stock of these two-publicly traded companies has roughly doubled over the past 3 years. In messages issued in 2012, an ICE administrator ordered employees to increase arrests in order to comply with the bed mandate. These days, the former ICE administrator is, guess what, an executive for one of the companies mentioned above.

The Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) bill passed by the Senate last June would give ICE more discretion in determining who to imprison and who to release. However, if you own stock in the companies listed above, don’t sell your shares just yet.

GOP Senators inserted an amendment into the CIR bill which would compel ICE to triple arrests in the Southwest. This would boost the cost of incarcerating inmates by over $1.5 billion over the next 10 years.

Great news for stockholders, but for taxpayers, it’s just another example of government waste.

Subscribe to our free, monthly e-mail newsletter, and follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+ and YouTube.

Submit "ICE's Bed Mandate: Who Benefits?" to Facebook Submit "ICE's Bed Mandate: Who Benefits?" to Twitter Submit "ICE's Bed Mandate: Who Benefits?" to Google Submit "ICE's Bed Mandate: Who Benefits?" to StumbleUpon Submit "ICE's Bed Mandate: Who Benefits?" to Reddit Submit "ICE's Bed Mandate: Who Benefits?" to Digg Submit "ICE's Bed Mandate: Who Benefits?" to

Updated 12-02-2013 at 12:14 PM by CShusterman


  1. Lynn Atherton Bloxham's Avatar
    the practice called private-government partnership. People all along the political spectrum praise these hybrids. Technically this practice goes beyond mercantilism, and broaches on fascism. Fascism is the practice of the State allocating privileged business to their friends.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: