ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

Plain Talk From The Left About Anti-Immigrant Racism. By Roger Algase

Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.

I will start off with a disclaimer: the article I am discussing today is by a far left-wing organization which supports two goals which I strongly oppose: socialism and open borders. The fact that I agree with some of their views on immigration, as described below, should not be taken as an endorsement of any of their other positions, whether on immigration or any other issue.

In fact, it is a sad commentary on the state of the American media today that one should have to look to the radical left for basic honesty about the role of race in American immigration policy, past and present, which mainstream politicians and commentators are still afraid to recognize openly.

The organization I am referring to is called Solidarity, which describes itself as a "Socialist, Feminist, Anti-Racist Organization". It has nothing to do with the Communist Party. See

In an article published almost a year ago, in May-June 2013, entitled Immigration and Racial Bias, by Malik Miah, Solidarity states:

"Immigrants from Latin American countries are no different than immigrants form Europe, Asia or the Middle East. They move to the United States - legal or undocumented - to find better opportunities for their families. That they pay taxes and put in more than they take out is rarely acknowledged. The myth fed by right wing media, that immigrants come here to get 'free stuff' like social benefits, is simply false.

Since the end of slavery, the immigration issue has divided descendants of the original settlers from the new arrivals. Nonwhites, the vast majority of newest immigrants, face more violence and discrimination than white immigrants who could assimilate into the white majority."

Then comes an unfortunate, but typical, diversion into far left wing lunacy which also finds many echoes on the far right these days, namely that the "capitalist class" favors skilled immigration to serve the interests of "Silicon Valley and big business", while keeping a "second class population to work backbreaking, low paying jobs".

Then, returning to reality, the article continues:

"Racial bias frames the discussions...The hysteria over border security targets mainly non-white working class immigrants."

The article goes on to say:

"The political negotiations in the Senate and House are based on meeting the dual needs of big business, but a sizable part of the Republican base are well funded nativist condervatives who see all 'illegals' (including non-immigrant H-1B visa holders from Asia) and non-white immigrants as a threat to their view of America." (Emphasis added.)

The article then goes on to describe the role of white supremacist hate groups (designated as such by the Southern Poverty Law Center - this is not only my description) such as NumbersUSA, FAIR and the Center for Immigration Studies, which have spent (according to the article) $100 million in anti-immigrant efforts over the past decade.

However, the article also points out that, on the left, the US labor movement also has a history of supporting restrictive immigration laws.

The author also reviews the long, all too familiar, history of racism in US immigration policy, from the time of the Chinese exclusion laws up until now. However, on a hopeful note, he states:

"A majority of younger Americans (under 40) reject this racist and chauvinistic view of European-Americans first. Most recognize immigrants as human beings, co-workers and neighbors."

As mentioned above, I strongly disagree with the idea that socialism and open borders are solutions to America's immigration problems, other than in the sense that if America becomes socialist, no one may want to come here any longer no matter how "open" the borders might be.

But this article, with all its shortcomings, is still a useful reminder that the purpose of immigration reform, especially legalization (and eventual permanent residence and citizenship) for 11 million mainly non-white out of status immigrants, is to make the ideal of true racial equality the law of the land - in actuality, not in name only.

This is the real goal of the immigration reform movement. America can no longer remain a country which continues to persecute minorities because of their race, while using "border security". "immigration enforcement" and the "rule of law" as a pretext for maintaining white supremacy in America.


Roger Algase is a New York attorney and a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School. For more than 30 years, working closely with his clients and giving personal attention to each case, he has been helping business and professional immigrants deal with the complexities of our immigration system.

His main areas of practice are H-1B and O-1 work visas; and green cards through Labor Certification, extraordinary ability, and opposite or same sex marriage. His email is

Submit "Plain Talk From The Left About Anti-Immigrant Racism. By Roger Algase" to Facebook Submit "Plain Talk From The Left About Anti-Immigrant Racism. By Roger Algase" to Twitter Submit "Plain Talk From The Left About Anti-Immigrant Racism. By Roger Algase" to Google Submit "Plain Talk From The Left About Anti-Immigrant Racism. By Roger Algase" to StumbleUpon Submit "Plain Talk From The Left About Anti-Immigrant Racism. By Roger Algase" to Reddit Submit "Plain Talk From The Left About Anti-Immigrant Racism. By Roger Algase" to Digg Submit "Plain Talk From The Left About Anti-Immigrant Racism. By Roger Algase" to

Updated 02-16-2014 at 07:04 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags


  1. federale86's Avatar
    Or, the communist. Interesting that you knew so much about this organization to claim it wasn't communist. Which probably means it is communist.

    But back to their accusations of racism leveled against those with whom they disagree. In fact, accusations of racism by communists and their allies are the first and only argument the radical left has on immigration.

    The United States has extensive unemployment but the radical left wants to import millions of more aliens to compete with the unemployed. Clearly an alliance of the radical left and billionaires to drive down wages. Americans, of course, don't want their wages to go down, but up. So, to the left, anyone who opposes that is a racist.

    The real racists are those communists who want to replace the white population of America with a non-white population. That is racism.

    In fact, immigrants come here for the welfare benefits. There are no food stamps in these nations of color. You can't get free housing in Mexico or anywhere else in the Third World. That is what immigrants want, endless checks of Social Security Disability payments for never working a single day.

    But you know as Peter Brimelow has said, you are winning an argument with leftists when they accuse you of racism.
  2. federale86's Avatar
    And if this communist organization isn't communist, why do they use a red star as their symbol? A typical communist symbol.
  3. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    Martin Luther King was called a communist too for wanting to bring about equality for people of color. Your racist rant is straight out of the Ku Klux Klan playbook.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
  4. immigrationlawyerla's Avatar
    Interesting Discussion. I have came across or a informative video, here is a link might it will give some help to others.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: