ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
© 1995-
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

Anti-Immigrant Judge Blocks Obama's Executive Action on Deportation. By Roger Algase

Rate this Entry

In a 123-page memorandum decision, Judge Andrew S. Hanen of the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Brownsville Division, who has a history of issuing anti-immigrant decisions, according to a report by America's Voice referred to below, has issued a temporary injunction against implementation of President Obama's announced executive action directing DHS to grant temporary relief from deportation, along with work permission to an estimated 4 million unauthorized immigrants now in the United States.

The preliminary injunction was issued late in the day on February 15, 2015. See Texas v. US, Case number 1:14 civ-00254

In his ruling, Judge Hanen made three main findings. First, he found that the 26 states which are plaintiffs in the lawsuit have standing to bring the lawsuit because of economic harm that they would suffer if the president's program, known as DAPA, were allowed to go into effect. This harm, as described by the Court, would consist of increased costs in providing drivers licenses and educational benefits to the immigrants affected, among other things.

Judge Hanen, however, rejected some of the states' more speculative claims of possible harm from DAPA, such as "encouraging illegal immigration" or creating a "humanitarian crisis on the US border".

The judge also determined that the projected harm to the states would be irrevocable, even if they were ultimately to win their case. It would, he ruled, be impractical or impossible for the states to revoke or undo the effects of licenses granted or other benefits which they would be required to issue to the affected immigrants under the DAPA program.

Most important of all, Judge Hanen ruled that the states had a high likelihood of success of prevailing on the merits of the case after a full hearing. This was not because of their claim that the executive branch exceeded its Constitutional authority in promulgating DAPA, which the Court said it was not necessary to rule on at this stage.

Thus, this decision does not give any support to one of the most often repeated claims by immigration opponents, namely that the president is "trashing" the Constitution by granting relief from deportation without Congressional approval. Judge Hanen specifically left this issue open.

In contrast, his ruling was based entirely on statutory grounds, namely that DAPA was "rule-making" within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and was therefore issued in violation of the procedural requirements of that statute, as well as being contrary to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

Judge Hanen stated (Memorandum, p. 111):

"The DAPA program clearly represents a substantive change in immigration policy. It is a program instituted to give a certain newly-adopted class of 4.3 million illegal immigrants not only legal presence in the United States, but also the right to work legally and the right to receive a myriad of government benefits to which they would otherwise not be entitled. It does more than supplement the statute; if anything, it contradicts the INA. It is, in effect, a new law." (Citations omitted, emphasis added).

The full decision is available at

The decision made clear that the existing DACA program, which was not made part of the lawsuit and was therefore not before the Court, is not affected by the preliminary injunction. However, expanding the DACA program is affected by this ruling.

The decision also states that it is not intended to affect the executive branch's existing authority to use prosecutorial discretion in connection with deportation.

The White House has announced that the grant of a preliminary injunction will be appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

It is also worth noting that Judge Hanen's record of previous decisions is not exactly consistent with that of a judge who is free from anti-immigrant bias, at least according to a January, 2015 report by America's Voice entitled: A Coordinated Attack: Judge Hanen and the Nativist Lawsuit against DAPA and DACA.

This report may tell us a good deal more about the judge's motives for granting the injunction than the decision itself does.

My colleague Nolan Rappaport has kindly provided me with a different link to the decision: Thank you, Nolan!

Here is a link to the America's Voice report:
Roger Algase is a New YorK lawyer and a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School. He has been practicing employment-based and family-based immigration law for more than 30 years.

Roger's practice is concentrated in H-1B specialty occupation and O-1 extraordinary ability work permits, J-1 training visas, and green cards through labor certification (PERM), extraordinary ability (EB-1) and opposite sex or same sex marriage. His email address is

Submit "Anti-Immigrant Judge Blocks Obama's Executive Action on Deportation. By Roger Algase" to Facebook Submit "Anti-Immigrant Judge Blocks Obama's Executive Action on Deportation. By Roger Algase" to Twitter Submit "Anti-Immigrant Judge Blocks Obama's Executive Action on Deportation. By Roger Algase" to Google Submit "Anti-Immigrant Judge Blocks Obama's Executive Action on Deportation. By Roger Algase" to StumbleUpon Submit "Anti-Immigrant Judge Blocks Obama's Executive Action on Deportation. By Roger Algase" to Reddit Submit "Anti-Immigrant Judge Blocks Obama's Executive Action on Deportation. By Roger Algase" to Digg Submit "Anti-Immigrant Judge Blocks Obama's Executive Action on Deportation. By Roger Algase" to

Updated 02-18-2015 at 07:19 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags


  1. Told You!'s Avatar
    Now that a federal judge has formally confirmed the ILLEGALITY of Obama's and DHS's abuse and misuse of Deferred Deportation, it's time for the Democrats to stop blocking the DHS funding bill. The GOP bill to fund DHS is waiting for the senate Democrats to stop blocking it. That bill is completely in line with the judge's order, and it's time to stop acting like lawless crybabies. Further, Obama broke the law with original DACA too. Those were not individuals in deportation proceedings. That was a whole class of illegal aliens who signed up, paid a fee, and got an illegal work permit. READ THE LAW, DEMOCRATS! Deferred deportation DOES NOT GIVE OBAMA THE AUTHORITY to hand out work permits to millions of illegal aliens. It's against the law! Further, Texas should file another suit immediately to reverse the old DACA and, the way the federal judges had to take over several school districts during de-segregation, seek the Court's takeover of DHS, which is being run not as an enforcement agency but rather an elaborate, taxpayer-funded coyote smuggling operation!
  2. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    As Told You! also must certainly be aware, this opinion is far from being the final word on the legality of Obama's latest executive action, but is merely the opening salvo in what may be a protracted battle over this issue.

    The Fifth Circuit, or, ultimately the Supreme Court, may have quite a different opinion about the issues involved in this case.

    It is also instructive to see how much difficulty immigration opponents have in sticking to the law when they are discussing immigration issues, without throwing gratuitous racist epithets such as calling 4 million or more immigrants "coyotes", just as Rep. Steve King calls DACA beneficiaries "drug mules".

    It is also noteworthy that, at least according to America's Voice, Judge Hanan has an unenviable history of anti-immigrant bias.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 02-17-2015 at 11:20 AM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  3. Tobias Nojob's Avatar
    Syllabification: me?di?o?cre
    Pronunciation: /ˌmēdēˈōkər /
    Definition of mediocre in English:
    Of only moderate quality; not very good:

    That's a suitable definition for the so-called "Executive Actions" dealing with immigration, announced by President Obama on November 20th, 2014.

    Wondering why the administration's legal staff were so reluctant to advise the President on issuing an EXECUTIVE ORDER pertaining to immigration, under the grounds of National Security, considering the fact that this nation in legal terms is in a State of War - and in most instances these decrees cannot be reviewed by the courts.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: