ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network




Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed


Letters of the Week: Mar 09 - Mar 13

Rate this Entry
Please email your letters to or post them directly as a comment below.

Submit "Letters of the Week: Mar 09 - Mar 13" to Facebook Submit "Letters of the Week: Mar 09 - Mar 13" to Twitter Submit "Letters of the Week: Mar 09 - Mar 13" to Google Submit "Letters of the Week: Mar 09 - Mar 13" to StumbleUpon Submit "Letters of the Week: Mar 09 - Mar 13" to Reddit Submit "Letters of the Week: Mar 09 - Mar 13" to Digg Submit "Letters of the Week: Mar 09 - Mar 13" to

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags


  1. Nolan Rappaport's Avatar
    You may already know about this. It's not new. But I didn't know about it until a few minutes ago.

    The Congressional Research Service (CRS) determined that Congress can block funding for the president?s plan to hand out work permits for illegal aliens, Breitbart reports. House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers, R-Ky., had claimed that Congress did not have to power to remove funding because the agency under which work permits and other documents are distributed is funded by applicant fees.

    The CRS analysis, which Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., requested and provided to Breitbart, said:

    ?In light of Congress?s constitutional power over the purse, the Supreme Court has recognized that ?Congress may always circumscribe agency discretion to allocate resources by putting restrictions in the operative statutes. Where Congress has done so, ?an agency is not free simply to disregard statutory responsibilities.? Therefore, if a statute were enacted which prohibited appropriated funds from being used for some specified purposes, then the relevant funds would be unavailable to be obligated or expended for those purposes?(A)mounts received as fees by federal agencies must still be appropriated by Congress to that agency in order to be available for obligation or expenditure by the agency?(T)he funds available to the agency through fee collections would be subject to the same potential restrictions imposed by Congress on the use of its appropriations as any other type of appropriated funds.?
  2. ImmigrationLawBlogs's Avatar
    First, is there any point to quoting the likes of Breitbart and Jeff Sessions as authorities in any discussion of immigration? Wouldn't that be equivalent to quoting Alabama Governor George Wallace as an authority on race relations or civil rights in the 1960's?

    Granted, the CRS is reputable, regardless of who requested its study, but what are the chances that Congress would actually pass a bill preventing DHS from using its funds to implement Obama's executive action on immigration, or that such a bill would ever be signed into law?

    I respectfully refer Nolan to someone who might be willing to share some recent experience with him about trying to get such a law passed - by the name of John Boehner.

    Roger Algase
    Attorney at Law
    Updated 03-11-2015 at 05:29 PM by ImmigrationLawBlogs
  3. Nolan Rappaport's Avatar
    I didn't quote Breitbart or Sessions as authorities on anything, and I didn't say that Congress will pass a bill preventing DHS from using its funds to implement President Obama's immigration executive actions. I just reported that CRS had said that Congress has the authority to pass such a bill. I though that was interesting and passed it on to readers. I do agree with one of Roger's comments though. CRS is a reputable authority.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: