ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

I-9 E-Verify Immigration Compliance

Abercrombie & Fitch Resolves another Discrimination Claim

Rate this Entry
By Bruce Buchanan, Siskind Susser P. C.

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Abercrombie Logo.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	5.5 KB 
ID:	972 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OSC.jpg 
Views:	113 
Size:	5.7 KB 
ID:	973

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) has reached an agreement with Abercrombie & Fitch Inc. (Abercrombie), a clothing retailer headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. The agreement resolves a complaint filed with OSC, claiming that the company discriminated against a non-U.S. citizen in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
The investigation found that Abercrombie required a non-U.S. citizen, but not similarly-situated U.S. citizens, to produce her permanent resident card (green card) for the purpose of verifying her employment eligibility. The INA’s anti-discrimination provision prohibits employers from making specific documentary demands based on citizenship status or national origin when verifying an employee’s employment eligibility.

Under the settlement agreement, Abercrombie will pay $3,661 in back pay to the complainant and a civil penalty of $1100 to the United States; establish a back pay fund of $153,932 to compensate other individuals who may have been harmed; undergo training on the anti-discrimination provision of the INA; revise their employment policies and training materials; and be subject to monitoring of its employment eligibility verification practices for two years.
This settlement agreement is one more legal problem for Abercrombie. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court decision found against Abercrombie concerning whether it needed to provide a religious accommodation. In that case, a job applicant wore a hijab to a job interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. The Court found that a job applicant need only demonstrate that a prospective employer’s desire to avoid providing a religious accommodation was a motivating factor in its decision not to hire, not that the employer actually knew of the need for an accommodation. In an immigration case several years ago, Abercrombie settled a case with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for $1 million due to essentially paperwork violations in their electronic I-9 system.

Submit "Abercrombie & Fitch Resolves another Discrimination Claim" to Facebook Submit "Abercrombie & Fitch Resolves another Discrimination Claim" to Twitter Submit "Abercrombie & Fitch Resolves another Discrimination Claim" to Google Submit "Abercrombie & Fitch Resolves another Discrimination Claim" to StumbleUpon Submit "Abercrombie & Fitch Resolves another Discrimination Claim" to Reddit Submit "Abercrombie & Fitch Resolves another Discrimination Claim" to Digg Submit "Abercrombie & Fitch Resolves another Discrimination Claim" to del.icio.us

Tags: i-9, ice, ina, osc Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: