ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Chris Musillo on Nurse and Allied Health Immigration

EXTENSIONS AND AMENDMENTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NEW PETITIONS

Rate this Entry
by Chris Musillo

The healthcare staffing and IT staffing industries have seen a large uptick in H-1B amendments being generated as a result of the USCIS foolish Simeio Solutions decision. One issue that has come as a surprise to many clients is that an H-1B amendment is essentially no less work than a new H-1B cap-subject or H-1B extension petition.

USCIS policy on deference to prior petitions is explained in a 2004 USCIS Memorandum by William Yates. Technically, USCIS officers are supposed to give deference in extension petitions unless,

(1) it is determined that there was a material error with regard to the previous petition approval; (2) a substantial change in circumstances has taken place; or (3) there is new material information that adversely impacts the petitioner’s or beneficiary’s eligibility. Material error, changed circumstances, or new material information must be clearly articulated in the resulting request for evidence or decision denying the benefit sought, as appropriate.
(April 23, 2004, Yates Memorandum)


The problem is that this section is made toothless by the next paragraph:

[t]his memorandum does not in any way restrict or impact an adjudicator’s ability to deny, in the exercise of his or her discretion, the beneficiary’s simultaneous request to extend his or her stay in the United States in the same classification.


As a result, the USCIS only pays lip-service to deference in amendment and extension petitions. The adjudicating officer will casually mention one of the three instances and then ask for entirely new information. The officer will usually point to the sentence that the memorandum is not “in any way” meant to restrict the adjudicator’s ability to deny a case.

Essentially all H-1B legal points must be re-raised by the employer and will ultimately be re-adjudicated by the USCIS.

Read the Musillo Unkenholt Healthcare and Immigration Law Blog at www.musillo.com or www.ilw.com. You can also visit us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Submit "EXTENSIONS AND AMENDMENTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NEW PETITIONS" to Facebook Submit "EXTENSIONS AND AMENDMENTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NEW PETITIONS" to Twitter Submit "EXTENSIONS AND AMENDMENTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NEW PETITIONS" to Google Submit "EXTENSIONS AND AMENDMENTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NEW PETITIONS" to StumbleUpon Submit "EXTENSIONS AND AMENDMENTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NEW PETITIONS" to Reddit Submit "EXTENSIONS AND AMENDMENTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NEW PETITIONS" to Digg Submit "EXTENSIONS AND AMENDMENTS ARE ESSENTIALLY NEW PETITIONS" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: