ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

I-9 E-Verify Immigration Compliance

Company’s Failure to File an Answer Leads to Finding of 4964 Form I-9 Violations

Rate this Entry
By Bruce Buchanan, Siskind Susser

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ICE NEW.jpg 
Views:	113 
Size:	4.8 KB 
ID:	1024

In deciding a procedural issue, the Office of Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) in U.S. v. Quickstuff, LLC, Maria Castillo, and A & C Staffing, LLC, 11 OCAHO no. 1265 (Nov. 20, 2015), found the employers engaged in 4964 Form I-9 violations. That may be a record.

In mid-2015, Immigrant & Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a Notice of Intent to Fine against Quickstuff, Castillo and A & C (Respondents) seeking in excess of $5 million in penalties. Therefore, Respondents requested a hearing. On July 9, 2015, ICE issued a complaint against Respondent with an answer due by August 12, 2015. However, no answer was filed nor a request for additional time to do so. Thereafter, on September 1, 2015, OCAHO filed an order to show cause as to why no answer was filed. On the same date, ICE filed a Motion for Entry of Default. No response was filed in response to the motion.

On September 9, OCAHO received copies of bankruptcy notices for Quickstuff and A & C. On September 16, OCAHO received a letter, from Respondents’ counsel of record, wherein he explained their failure to respond to the complaint “was due to a mistaken belief that the automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code would apply.” He acknowledged that he now was aware such a stay does not apply to an action by a governmental unit enforcing its police or regulatory powers. 11 U.S.C. 362 (a)(1). But, the letter did not offer an answer to the complaint; rather, counsel requested it to be given to a later date to file such.

OCAHO discussed applicable case law which found the failure to file a timely answer puts the employer in default and may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to contest the allegations. When a party makes an untimely request for an extension to answer, it must establish good cause and excusable neglect. Furthermore, a formal motion must be made for the request.

OCAHO found counsel’s letter did not constitute an answer, which it noted could “have been drafted in considerably less time than it took to prepare the three-page single-spaced letter asking for additional time.” Moreover, Respondents’ counsel failed to use due diligence in making some effort to file an answer or request an extension of time. Furthermore, an attorney’s ignorance of the law is not considered “either good cause or excusable neglect.” As OCAHO stated, “the attorney’s ignorance of readily ascertainable law simply cannot be characterized as good cause for failing to file an answer.”

In conclusion, OCAHO found Respondents’ response failed to show cause why their request for a hearing should not be deemed abandoned. Therefore, ICE’s Notice of Intent to Fine is the final agency decision in this matter.

As all employers should know, the failure to answer a complaint has serious consequences. In this case, 5 million of them. Furthermore, this decision demonstrates the importance of hiring counsel who is well-versed in immigration compliance law.

Submit "Company’s Failure to File an Answer Leads to Finding of 4964 Form I-9 Violations" to Facebook Submit "Company’s Failure to File an Answer Leads to Finding of 4964 Form I-9 Violations" to Twitter Submit "Company’s Failure to File an Answer Leads to Finding of 4964 Form I-9 Violations" to Google Submit "Company’s Failure to File an Answer Leads to Finding of 4964 Form I-9 Violations" to StumbleUpon Submit "Company’s Failure to File an Answer Leads to Finding of 4964 Form I-9 Violations" to Reddit Submit "Company’s Failure to File an Answer Leads to Finding of 4964 Form I-9 Violations" to Digg Submit "Company’s Failure to File an Answer Leads to Finding of 4964 Form I-9 Violations" to del.icio.us

Comments

  1. mikel's Avatar
    IWC was founded in 1868, the breitling replica uk watch 130 years of history. Founding abode alleged Buddha Hauser summer, the bounded history of watches and clocks can be traced aback to the aboriginal 15th century, a abounding 459 years beforehand than iwc. But afterwards the bulb got IWC tabulation, time accuracy, it came to be durably in the hands. IWC Swiss rank additional alone to Principal table table table First brand even hardly college than some Rolex. People just do not apperceive much, the aspect of the fake rolex is easygoing luxury, not play. In the able acreage of watchmaking technology, the addition action Schaffhausen, so watch enthusiasts praise. IWC watches including the aboriginal Grande Complication watch series, Da Vinci watch alternation and the Portuguese watch series. Pilot watch series, watch alternation and abyssal engineers Chronograph series, it belongs to the acceptable blazon watch timepiece. The luxury breitling replica a sports applied design, accompanying with stainless animate or titanium case, those a lot of acceptable for adventurous accustomed wear.Intentioned designed details, can fully demonstrate the human emotional colors and charm. Most consumers are always willing to invest in the notes that the most humane and therefore the most attention to the details of the goods, watches certainly no exception.
Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: