ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

Immigration Law Blogs on ILW.COM

BALCA Affirms that Content Requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) Don’t Apply to Job O

Rate this Entry
The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (“BALCA”) recently affirmed that the content requirements that are specified in the federal regulations for newspaper advertisements in 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) do not pertain to state workforce agency job orders. The employer submitted a labor certification for the position of “computer software engineers, systems software” and specified in the Form 9089 that the position required five years of experience. The case was audited and denied because the job order that the employer provided stated that the position had an experience requirement of “greater than 5 years.” The employer appealed the decision and noted that the Illinois state workforce agency job order site only provided a set number of experience options that included “3-5 years” and “greater than 5 years.” The employer stated that it choose the option of “greater than five years because it was the most appropriate since ‘3-5 years’ was not an accurate reflection of tis experience requirement.” BALCA reviewed Matter of Chabad Lubavitch Center, 2011-PER-2614, and noted that the requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) only apply to “advertisements placed in newspapers of general circulation or in professional journals.” BALCA also found that the federal regulations that govern job orders are silent in regards to whether the content requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) apply to job orders, which lead it to believe that the Department of Labor “did not intend to impose these content requirements on all types of advertisements.” Many state workforce agencies provide limited options in regards what can be selected for experience requirements. This case instructs the DOL that it may not deny cases when the state workforce agency fails to allow employers to specify the exact requirements of the position. This post originally appeared on HLG's Views blog by Cadence Moore. http://www.hammondlawgroup.com/blog/

Submit "BALCA Affirms that Content Requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) Don’t Apply to Job O" to Facebook Submit "BALCA Affirms that Content Requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) Don’t Apply to Job O" to Twitter Submit "BALCA Affirms that Content Requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) Don’t Apply to Job O" to Google Submit "BALCA Affirms that Content Requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) Don’t Apply to Job O" to StumbleUpon Submit "BALCA Affirms that Content Requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) Don’t Apply to Job O" to Reddit Submit "BALCA Affirms that Content Requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) Don’t Apply to Job O" to Digg Submit "BALCA Affirms that Content Requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(f) Don’t Apply to Job O" to del.icio.us

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: