ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

移民日报

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of
free information!
Copyright
© 1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

View RSS Feed

I-9 E-Verify Immigration Compliance

OSC Settles with Macy’s Concerning Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim

Rate this Entry
By Bruce Buchanan, Sebelist Buchanan Law PLLC

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	macys-herald-square-exterior.jpg 
Views:	49 
Size:	7.4 KB 
ID:	1088

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) agreed to a settlement agreement with Macy’s over allegations that the national retailer violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by discriminating against work-authorized non-U.S. citizens at its Glendale, California, facility.

The OSC’s investigation was based on a charge filed by a lawful permanent resident (LPR) whose hiring was delayed in October 2015. The investigation found the employee was not able to begin working at Macy’s even though she showed sufficient proof of her work authorization because a Macy’s official incorrectly believed that LPRs were required to produce unexpired permanent resident cards, rather than any other document(s). The investigation also found that other human resource employees in Macy’s Glendale location were imposing the same unnecessary requirement on four other LPRS. In contrast, U.S. citizens were permitted to choose whichever valid documents they wanted to present to prove their work authorization. Under the INA, LPRs do not have to show their permanent resident cards when they start working; instead, they can choose whichever documentation the would like to present, such as a driver’s license and unrestricted social security card, from the lists of acceptable documents.

Under the settlement agreement, Macy’s will pay an $8,700 civil penalty, provide additional training to its employees and assess its employees’ understanding of applicable rules, and be subject to monitoring for 18 months, including periodically producing Form I-9 information to the OSC for review.

This settlement is just another instance of OSC’s aggressive approach to enforcing the anti-discrimination provisions under Section 12324b of the INA. To date in calendar year 2016, the OSC has settled eight discrimination cases. Even after all of this activity, I would estimate 50% of employers are not aware of the OSC and its authority.

Submit "OSC Settles with Macy’s Concerning Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim" to Facebook Submit "OSC Settles with Macy’s Concerning Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim" to Twitter Submit "OSC Settles with Macy’s Concerning Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim" to Google Submit "OSC Settles with Macy’s Concerning Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim" to StumbleUpon Submit "OSC Settles with Macy’s Concerning Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim" to Reddit Submit "OSC Settles with Macy’s Concerning Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim" to Digg Submit "OSC Settles with Macy’s Concerning Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim" to del.icio.us

Comments

Put Free Immigration Law Headlines On Your Website

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers Enter your email address here: