« SUPREME COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF IMMIGRANT IN DEPORTATION CASE | Main | DEMS TO PUSH IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT IN LEAD UP TO ELECTIONS »

June 17, 2008

WHO WILL BE COVERED BY E-VERIFY EXECUTIVE ORDER

When I posted immediately after the release of the President's Executive Order requiring federal contractors to use E-Verify, I guessed that health care institutions that took Medicare and universities that participated in the federal student loan program would be covered. The proposed regulations, however, are more specific in stating that the order only applies to acquisition contracts and not all contracts. Procurement contracts involving goods and services are clearly covered, but I don't think Medicare a student loans would trigger the requirement, based on my reading. That does not mean health care employers and universities are off the hook, however. Many of them have contracts to provide services to federal employees. For example, if a hospital treats federal employees or their families under a provider contract, that might be covered. And universities accepting federal funds for research projects might be covered. Universities are nervous about the new rule as seen from this article in the Chronicle of Higher Education.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834521fa969e200e553753f458834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WHO WILL BE COVERED BY E-VERIFY EXECUTIVE ORDER:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

We are not a government contractor but we supply temporaries to clients that may be covered because they may have government contracts. The workers are clearly our employees and not the employee of the client. I would think we are not covered because it is no different than a company hiring a banquet hall for a company function and expecting the banquet hall to comply.

We are not a government contractor but we supply temporaries to clients that may be covered because they may have government contracts. The workers are clearing our employees and not the employee of the client. I would think we are not covered because it is no different than a company hiring a banquet hall for a company function and expecting the banquet hall to comply.

Mr. Siskind,
Please excuse my ignorance but I was doing a little research on the amended executive order 12989 and found your blog. I am intrigued by your post on the possible requirements for health care companies and universities to comply with E-verify. Would any institution that accepts federal funds be affected by the executive order? (I guess--among other things--I don't really know what constitutes a federal contractor.) If so would my local city government have to begin using the E-Verify system? I am sure there are many things I am not considering but my knowledge of the subject is very limited. I appreciate your expertise.

owen

Thank you very much for the quick reply Greg, I appriciate it very much.

Alex

The bill is going to be marked up next week and then will hopefully get a fast vote on the floor. The challenge will be to move things in the Senate quickly, but I'm more optimistic than in the recent past.

It is a contract to purchase goods or services.

Sorry for my ignorance, but what is an 'acquisition contract'?

Hi Greg,

I know that it is not connected to the post but can you please tell what you know about the HR 5924 (nurse visas) especially after the hearing held this week, please please share your view. please.

Thanks

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment