My Photo

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Classifieds

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

VIP Lawyer Network

CLE Seminars

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise

Services 4 LawFirms

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

EB-5

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE


ilw.com VIP

The leading immigration law publisher - over 50000 pages of free information!

Copyright © 1995-
ILW.COM,American Immigration LLC.

Blog powered by TypePad

« Jun 4 - Hunger Strike NYC | Main | Jun 8 - Opportunist Flip Flops »

Jun 08, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834521fa969e20133f05965a2970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jun 7 - Immigration Inkblot Test:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It baffles me that many people who claim to be concerned about the protection of the United States find it out of harmony and seem to run inconsistent with the general pattern of the Arizona Immigration Law. What's strange about asking someone to provide evidence he/she is in the country legally? I am sure those who are in conflict with the law are those that are importing illegal immigrants into the country...probable for the advancement of their selfish interest. And it's strange how someone stands tall in declaring people that have no respect for properly constituted immigration rules "Innocent." As far as I know, a leader is not a terror to those that follow the rules, which means laws are not a a terror to those with a healthy respect for properly constituted rules. If you think that the law will lead to racial profiling, then I think there is a "race" known to be "lawless." If the Arizona law could conveniently affect a specific race, then I think instead of accusing the law, one has to advice that race to get out of that shell and begin to run in harmony with the properly constituted rules. It's absolutely stupid that people that have broken the law could stand tall and ask for right to stay! It's just like someone breaking into your home and demanding for the right to remain there brashly simply because he thinks you have more than enough to support him...how stupid!!

Regarding the new Arizona Law:

Can somone answer this question for me?

The Honorable Ex-Governor Janet Napolitano is a democrat and as such became the Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security.

When she left as Governor of Arizona, a republican, Jan Brewer, became Governor. Within two years or so she passed the
most discriminatory immigration act of the century.

What was Secretary Janet Napolitano and President Obama doing all this time? Were they asleep at the wheel or silently
encouraging Governor Brewer's actions? Or were all of President obama's speeches just hot air?

The comments to this entry are closed.