My Photo

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Classifieds

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

VIP Lawyer Network

CLE Seminars

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise

Services 4 LawFirms

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

EB-5

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE


ilw.com VIP

The leading immigration law publisher - over 50000 pages of free information!

Copyright © 1995-
ILW.COM,American Immigration LLC.

Blog powered by TypePad

« Feb 2 - Top Links January 2011 | Main | Feb 4 - The Mean Center »

Feb 03, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834521fa969e20148c84e82c1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Feb 3 - Democrats versus Immigrants:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

hello,

i just found the format not comfortable to read, the info was good.


thanks,

I agree with most of Honza Prchal's comment. It is incredible that a supposedly rational, advanced country like the US would make it so difficult for educated, affluent and skilled people who have the most to contribute to our economy to live and work in America.

However, our laws concerning educated immigrants and those with valuable skills are not all that severe or irrational, though no one would argue that they are perfect. It is the way that these laws are being enforced that is the main cause of the problem.

Few people who are familiar with immigration would dispute that the application of these laws has become more draconian and hostile to educated, skilled immigrants in the past two years. The more qualified a foreign professional worker or entrepreneur may be, the more of a threat that person is seen to the job security or salary levels of educated, skilled US workers.

This narrow and illusory way of thinking, which the Obama administration is obsessed with, is the main obstacle to developing a fair immigration system that will benefit everyone.

Thank you for the lead article in http://www.ilw.com/immigration daily/digest/2011,0203.shtm.

The immigration code, like the tax code and health insurance regulations, is the product of decades of special interest carve outs and Congressional and Executive micro-managing held together from time to time with judicial and bureaucratic jury-rigging. Both could stand a good bit of simplification. We've ceded far too much control over people's lives to a faceless, hapless and harried bureaucracy tasked with the thankless and counter-productive task of picking winners.

A simpler and more market-based immigration system like one that simply sells the right of entry at a transparent and low rate (and includes simple but robust public-health and security carve-outs) may not sound good as an ideal, but it would be a darn sight better than what we have now and a whole lot easier to administer.

Our present system is perpetuated by those who have an interest in delaying assimilation of the low skill types (disproportionately semi-literate or even non-Spanish speaking much less English reading and writing Oaxacan peasants) it perversely favors over high skilled high achievers (engineers, PhDs, H1-B candidates, graduates of US institutions of higher learning and their children, wealthy foreigners who want to relocate here) most Americans would likely admit they want here. Those who come illegally do reasonably well if they stay long enough to become undeportable de jure or de facto, but few rational people would claim that shifting the pool towards those most likely to really develop their human capital is a bad deal for the country.

After a reform that makes our system transparent and widely acceptable as just, we have a better chance of getting acquiescence to plans to allow those who came illegally a path to assimilation. We also have a better chance of enforcing our laws, in no small part because those enforcing them might more often be able to understand them.

Just in case anyone should misunderstand, I am using the term "immigrant vote" in its broad sense, namely votes of American citizens who come from or identify with immigrant communities, including but not limited to Americans who were once immigrants themselves. I do not mean to imply that immigrants who are not US citizens should be allowed to vote.

With respect to the February 3 ID comment, it is utterly amazing that the Republicans do not try to seize the tremendous opportunity they have as a result of the Obama administration's strenuous efforts to hand them the immigrant vote on a silver platter. If the Republicans were willing, even to a small extent, to moderate their anti-immigrant and anti-Latino hard line positions, they might actually be able to achieve their stated long standing goal of becoming a permanent majority.

But, just as the Democrats have been seduced by the calls of cynicism, expediency and Realpolitik on immigration, the Republicans have been blinded by hatred and prejudice. It is time for a third party willing to support immigrant rights, in the tradition of the civil rights movement, which initially had little or no welcome inside the Democratic party's establishment and had to operate as an independent force for a long time.

The comments to this entry are closed.